User talk:Jzsj

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

My Talk Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

Hello - are you able to add the new encyclical to Pope Francis’ wiki page? It’s locked or I would gladly.

A cookie for you!

I had Osmond P. Martin on a list, thank you Father. T. Anthony (talk) 03:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear Jzsj, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity related articles, especially your recent creation of Centre for Research and Popular Service. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 22:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Thanks

Dear User:Jzsj, I'm really glad that you were encouraged by the barnstar and how awesome that you were awarded one exactly a year after your first contribution! Please keep me in your prayers! With regards, Anupam^Talk 23:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for all the articles you are working on creating. They are well researched, as well as excellently referenced. Pay no attention to naysayers. Keep positive, and keep up your diligent work! Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant 06:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	god bless Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant 00:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Well done on your recent, well-written and well-referenced articles on schools. Boleyn (talk) 12:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work on catholic related pages! talk) 01:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply ]

A barnstar for you!

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		Thanks for your work in improving Social Research and Action Center, which made it easy for me to withdraw my AfD nomination for the article. Thanks for all of the work you do to improve Wikipedia, and the world itself with your personal endeavors. North America1000 19:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	Awesome job at Jesuit Outreach, Segundo Barrio. It will be a Snow Keep. Unless of course the nominator withdraws. – Lionel(talk) 13:41, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Sacrament of Penance

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sacrament of Penance. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Image and Reality of the Israel–Palestine Conflict

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Image and Reality of the Israel–Palestine Conflict. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

.

October 2019

Hello Jzsj,

I noticed at User talk:Cyberpower678 that you have expressed an interest in editing Optatam Totius. I want to remind you that you are "indefinitely topic banned from editing, discussing, or mentioning any articles related to education or schools, broadly construed." As you well know, Optatam Totius is Catholic policy concerning seminaries and the education of men studying to become priests. Seminaries are schools. Editing that article would be a clear violation of your topic ban, and you have recently come off of a three month block for topic ban violations. I urge caution on your part because your next block is likely to be indefinite. I invite Cyberpower678 to comment as well. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your thoughts ahead of time. I have never consciously violated the ban, but the "broadly construed" seems in need of interpretation at times. Optatum totius is mainly about the religious formation in the seminaries, but with your warning I will leave the improvement of that article to someone else. @Cullen328: Jzsj (talk) 19:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Please keep in mind that religious education is a type of education. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have an impressive record on "accidents" and "inadvertent slips" while editing. Rattling at the door to narrow your topic ban is not a good idea. Please keep Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1012#Jzsj_topic_ban_violation_June_2019 in mind. The Banner talk 22:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And it must be said, for the benefit of those reading this and not taking time to check the record, that you have very long record of making rash, unsubstantiated charges against me. Jzsj (talk) 12:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ow, because I was rash and unsubstantiated you got a three month block???? The Banner talk 19:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rash and unsubstantiated are your judgments on my deliberateness and intentions in my few oversights during my over 30,000 edits. Jzsj (talk) 22:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Catholic Church and homosexuality

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catholic Church and homosexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Template talk:History of Christianity

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:History of Christianity. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:The Bible and homosexuality

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Bible and homosexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Houthi movement

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Houthi movement. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on

Talk:2019 Halle synagogue shooting

The

this request for comment on Talk:2019 Halle synagogue shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ‎Antisemitism?. Shrike (talk) 19:58, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Template talk:Effective altruism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Effective altruism. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Tulsi Gabbard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tulsi Gabbard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pilgrim Church?

What is the pilgrim church from Chapter 7 of Lumen Gentium? What is the difference between the militant church and the pilgrim church? Or am I missing something? Would Pilgrim Church be part of Catholic ecclesiology?Manabimasu (talk) 12:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• "Church militant" and such martial expressions have been replaced, in the post-Vatican II era of ecumenism, with neutral terms that are more modest and humble, less triumphalist. This can be noted in Chapter 7 of Lumen Gentium and consistently throughout the writings of the Council. @Manabimasu: Jzsj (talk) 13:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Ole Nydahl

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ole Nydahl. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Lynching

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lynching. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Discrimination against atheists

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Discrimination against atheists. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Dexter Avenue Baptist Church

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dexter Avenue Baptist Church. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Please comment on Talk:Swaminarayan Sampraday

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Swaminarayan Sampraday. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Syriac Orthodox Church

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syriac Orthodox Church. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Knights of Columbus

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Knights of Columbus. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on

Talk:James Martin (priest, born 1960)

The

this request for comment on Talk:James Martin (priest, born 1960). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Please comment on Talk:Knights of Columbus

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Knights of Columbus. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:List of Christian denominations by number of members

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Christian denominations by number of members. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Elizium23 wishes you a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! May this be a time of peace, joy and goodwill towards all.
Elizium23 (talk) 15:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Have a joyous Christmas. Wish you a happy & prosperous 2020

Alex-h (talk) 13:34, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

	Nice to meet you ~
	~ Thanks ~ Pope Francis ~ I don't know why google books showed 'page not here' ~ regards ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I use "Cite" in the "Edit" mode. Thanks for your interest with Francis! @Mitchellhobbs: Jzsj (talk) 11:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Transubstantiation#New addition

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Transubstantiation#New addition. Elizium23 (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on the Reformation

My apologies for changing and "stomping" on your edits in the Denmark section of the Reformation article. Your edits were fine, but the information already present in the article did not agree with what reliable sources stated. Sorry to have stomped on your editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:55, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Order of Friars Minor Conventual, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, easily fixed: "urban area". Jzsj (talk) 12:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

You wouldn't happen to know of any more modern Christian views on the subject? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång: I'm sorry, but on topics outside Catholic theology I'm only copy editing, and I have no background in this area. Jzsj (talk) 19:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough and thanks! Perhaps you'll enjoy The Bible and humor, I started that article and I think it turned out ok. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Xavier's School, Behror is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Xavier's School, Behror (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your editions to Pope Francis because we don't place hatnotes with contents like that. Regards. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 15:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how what I added fits the notion of a hatnote, or is any different from the previous two sentences of the lede to the section, giving another perspective on what follows. I see this as a necessary balance to what the previous sentences state. @ExperiencedArticleFixer: Jzsj (talk) 16:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Refresh your cache and look at your edition. There is a big title like from an opinion piece of a newspaper ("Why do some Catholics oppose the Pope" or something to that effect) as the first thing in the article. I already reverted you again but you can look at it from the history. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 16:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you mean first thing in the section. This disagreement must be resolved by consensus, not by your opinion which is far from explained here or in your edits. Why have you placed this here rather than on the talk page of the article? @ExperiencedArticleFixer: Jzsj (talk) 16:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I said "first thing in the article". It's right there in my previous message. You are engaging in conversation without reading all of what I'm telling you. There is no need for posting in the Talk page or for consensus because this is not about content. Every editor is going to tell you the same: that text is displaying in the wrong place. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 16:21, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jzsj. I'm really surprised you have been edit warring to replace your inappropriate note above the lead, which you first added here (while simultaneously removing the existing, appropriate, hatnote "266th pope of the Catholic Church"), instead of looking at what happened, as ExperiencedArticleFixer nicely asked you to do. I do believe the note was a mistake on your part to begin with, and your latest revert is making it again appear at the top, like this. Frankly, it's making the article look a mess. Please stop edit warring right now and, well, please just listen to what ExperiencedArticleFixer tells you. Bishonen | tålk 16:25, 22 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

I was just trying to figure out why what I added to the controversies section was eliminated with such a strange explanation. I was completely oblivious of placing my ref at the wrong place ... and didn't understand why @ExperiencedArticleFixer: eliminated my intended addition in the Controversies section. Again, the Wikipedia jargon needs clarification for those of us who are more on the creative side than engaged in oversight. Thanks for your patience with us! and for your clearer explanation. Am I to assume that I may restore what I originally intended, as part of the intro to the controversies section? @Bishonen: Jzsj (talk) 16:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think I was super clear. You seemed like you weren't fully reading my messages. And I did not use jargon, other than the word "hatnote", which was used in the generic sense of "note at the top". Yes, I would say go ahead and restore it, the content looked fine by me. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 17:03, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See

• @Doug Weller: I'm not sure where you found me ignoring this directive, which is also in Chicago Manuel of Style. Are you thinking of when a quotation is blocked off, without quotation marks? My understanding is that this is different than a "quotation within quotes".

Also, can you direct me to the guideline that would justify the following switch from single to double quotation marks: referred to themselves as 'The Way' ...The term "Christian" ... meaning "followers of Christ" ... Jzsj (talk) 15:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

This requires too much technical background which I don't have, for me to get into this right now. Sorry. Maybe when I've finished copy editing all the Catholic articles. @Yapperbot: Jzsj (talk) 15:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

baseless comment

You describe holding hands during the Lord's Prayer as common. But seeing the sources, as far as I can see it is an American thing. I have never seen that happen during mass. Not in Ireland, nor in the Netherlands. Could you please rewrite that part? The Banner talk 13:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I have added this qualification. Jzsj (talk) 14:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• I note that the practice is gaining ground in England, if not in Ireland. This as acknowledged in a rather conservative Catholic journal. Jzsj (talk) 14:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• This person (below) visiting Lourdes explains well what post-Vatican II liturgists are trying to say, that the entire impact of the Mass should be on us, not on God, and so we should use every means to increase this grace. The church is not quick to embrace change; it is seldom caught in few flip-flops. But from what the woman says here, things are moving forward worldwide: "I saw that many others in the basilica had joined hands, and instinctively I reached out for the hand of the person on the other side of me. In that moment I went from feeling like a stranger, to someone who belonged. I belonged not only with the people around me, but with everyone in Lourdes that day, and with everyone praying the Our Father in different languages around the world. I realised that the power of the Our Father wasn’t only in the words themselves – amazing though they are – but in the effect that God’s Spirit has on us when we say that prayer." Jzsj (talk) 14:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your (first) source is American and does not mention England or Great-Britain at all. So if you can add to Mass in the Catholic Church that it is UNcommon outside the USA would be much better. The Banner talk 14:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I need a ref to establish that. No claim is made beyond the United States. Jzsj (talk) 14:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And your second sources gives no evidence that it is common outside the USA. Maybe the woman on the stretcher was with a group of Americans, but it says nothing about others. Please, do not make up things. The Banner talk 14:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed reference to outside the USA; why keep arguing on that point? As to Lourdes, I draw no conclusion from it in the article, but here is what it says: "Many others in the basilica had joined hands, and instinctively I reached out for the hand of the person on the other side of me. In that moment I went from feeling like a stranger, to someone who belonged. I belonged not only with the people around me, but with everyone in Lourdes that day, and with everyone praying the Our Father in different languages around the world." Jzsj (talk) 14:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because we are a neutral encyclopedia. I have now moved it under a separate minor header. The Banner talk 08:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your "minor header" seems to say that all that follows applies only to the United States. I've added your statement to the article, even though the Lourdes account makes no such restriction. This is just one of many refs that might show that this happens outside the USA, and this from the conservative Catholic Herald of UK. Jzsj (talk) 09:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

God surely exists.

But what is it like to believe in a being who has created a rotting world full of death, evil and ugliness?

Don't you think that this god is as evil as his imperfect creations? Take a look around you, investigate and you will see starving children, congenital diseases, unresolved injustices, lies, moral degeneration.

Such a nauseating world cannot be the work of a good and perfect being. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LudwigVonAndersen (talk • contribs) 19:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you left this on my talk page: I don't recall editing an article about the nature of God. But I believe we must distinguish between material evil and moral evil. In making us free God allows us to choose, for our eternal personal enhancement, whether to cause suffering or to become Godlike, compassionate, by relieving suffering around us. In Jesus God endured more suffering than will ever be asked of us, precisely to strengthen us to endure physical suffering, for "suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope" (Rom 5:4). As Christians we hope for an eternal reward for all our good deeds in relieving the sufferings of others. Jzsj (talk) 20:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jzsj, I don't know why this person left this message, but I thought you might like to know that the account has been blocked as a sockpuppet of banned user JamesOredan, who has been causing disruption in the "Expulsion of the Moriscos" article among others, under various names and IPs. --IamNotU (talk) 00:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

]

Nomination of

Istituto San Leone Magno

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Istituto San Leone Magno until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SaintDismas.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Father! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I know it is painful but your work is deeply appreciated. Best! From India :-) Vikram Vincent 09:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Vincentvikram: This is very meaningful work to make good use of one's time. The only painful thing is that most Catholic editors don't stick with it. I do appreciate any support in editing, and am prepared to come to the support of others. However, I am not an expert on the intricacies of Wikipedia conventions, and as a scientist I often wish that the policies and guidelines were written more "elegantly" (concise, free of lingo, graphic illustrations) for easy understanding.Jzsj (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

]

Loyola Jesuit Secondary School, Malawi

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Loyola Jesuit Secondary School, Malawi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loyola Jesuit Secondary School, Malawi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Banner talk 16:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Mary's Catholic College, Casino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Mary's Catholic College, Casino until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Banner talk 13:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Wikipedian is deceased. Respectful comments of remembrance may be left below.

Even controversy creates a shared history. Rest in Peace, Jzsj.^[1] The Banner talk 20:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. RIP. —

talk, contribs) 00:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Rest in peace, Father Zupez. I never knew you, however I thank you for your multiple wiki contributions concerning our Catholic faith. May God have mercy on your soul. — Motsyrhc 09:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

1. ^ [1]

Nomination of Xavier Institute for Tribal Education for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xavier Institute for Tribal Education is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xavier Institute for Tribal Education until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   08:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Loyola Yomiuri School, Bijapur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loyola Yomiuri School, Bijapur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loyola Yomiuri School, Bijapur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection

The article Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Relies on a page on some religious encyclopedia and two unrelated websites for sources. Found no significant coverage to justify having an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 16:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection (logo).png

Thanks for uploading File:Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St. Joseph's College Higher Secondary School, Trichy

The article St. Joseph's College Higher Secondary School, Trichy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uncited with no notability per WP:SCHOOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of St. Michael Technical School, Surakarta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Michael Technical School, Surakarta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Michael Technical School, Surakarta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wacana Bhakti Seminary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wacana Bhakti Seminary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wacana Bhakti Seminary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]