User talk:Kbfcfan

Welcome Kbfcfan!

Hello new user, since you've started editing at wikipedia recently, I want bring your notice regarding the recent edits you have did at the

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Aaron Hughes, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wes Brown. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey are you reading these warnings, if you are reading reply here immediately, or if you continue ignoring or go on disrupt article, you may be blocked. You can contribute to the articles in which you are doing edits in a better way, just read the guidelines and polcies, go through the linked pages mentioned in the welcome note above. Hope you take a better step.
  talk) 01:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:27, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kbfcfan,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Shivani S Menon, for deletion, because it's impossible to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 07:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kbfcfan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 08:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Lana Tailor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ Amkgp ✉ 11:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sandesh Jhingan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Why are you continuing this kind of edits again and again. When someone reverts your edit, you must open a discussion at the article talk page. And your edits are reverted by multiple editors. And again and again I am saying, go through the policies and guidelines for God's sake. Trust me you will be a very helpful and productive here once you go through the policies and guidelines, atleast go through the above mentioned policies once, please. Drat8sub (talk) 23:42, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

→ You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Drat8sub (talk) 14:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

]

Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fans

SS49 & Dr. Kadzi, I want to bring to your notice in case you don't see, that the user previously created the article multiple times here and here, and was nominated for deletion. Drat8sub (talk) 14:00, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kerala Blasters Youth and Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerala Blasters Youth and Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kbfcfan. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]