User talk:KormiSK

Hello, KingisNitro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 17:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Glucosone.png

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Insaniquarium characters has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ––FormalDude talk 05:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Insaniquarium characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Insaniquarium characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For respecting AfD process during the List of Insaniquarium Characters deletion discussion! Dronebogus (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cytidine diphosphate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page S. aureus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

I noticed you had made this change and this one to articles I have recently edited and are on my watchlist. Your edit summary was EC numbers are for enzymes, not reactions. Your edits are unhelpful because, as Enzyme Commission number says (based on reliable sources) EC numbers do not specify enzymes but enzyme-catalyzed reactions. If different enzymes (for instance from different organisms) catalyze the same reaction, then they receive the same EC number. An EC number is a unique identifier for a reaction: it cannot be unique for an enzyme because the amino-acid sequence of proteins can vary considerably while not changing the function of the enzyme. There are UniProt identifiers which uniquely specify a protein by its amino acid sequence but that's not what I was using in my edits. Please go back and restore the versions of these articles and similarly revert any other such changes you have made to other articles I may not have noticed. Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael D. Turnbull: Hi there, I will not be reverting those changes. The page Enzyme Commission number, that you have linked as well, states "The Enzyme Commission number (EC number) is a numerical classification scheme for enzymes, based on the chemical reactions they catalyze." By definition, Enzyme Commission number defines the ENZYME that catalyzes the reaction, e.g. "alcohol dehydrogenase", not the reaction itself. The reaction is described (and classifies the enzymes) by the numbers. The fact that the enzyme can have multiple primary sequences does not mean that it is not the same enzyme (i.e., catalyzing the same reaction).

The source page for the sentence you have singled out, http://www.expasy.org/enzyme/, does not even mention the word "reaction" and I have no idea why it is linked as a "reliable" source, as it does not say whatever it is supposed to be backing up. The sentence I've picked out is linked to a source called "Enzyme nomenclature" - after all, we're naming enzymes. Same goes for Enzyme nomenclature by IUBMB - it's an enzyme nomenclature, not reaction nomenclature. I do not mind the numbers being linked on the page, but you cannot say it is "catalyzing reaction EC 1.1.1.1", as "EC 1.1.1.1" = "alcohol dehydrogenase". Also with that said, even what you said isn't true - the numbers do not mention a specific reaction, as EC 1.1.1.1 can catalyze both primary and secondary alcohols, i.e. the reaction is ambiguous. If you wish, edit all of those pages to say "it is catalyzed by [enzyme name] [EC number]".

talk) 11:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

One of the most reliable sources (the first external link in the Enzyme Commission number article) is this one, which uses the word "reaction" many times, notably to say Classification of Enzymes by the Reactions they Catalyse and Furthermore, because classification is based solely on the reaction catalysed, there are cases where proteins of very different sequences catalyse the same reaction. The point is that this is a classification scheme not a naming scheme. I think that it is perfectly reasonable to want to help readers of Wikipedia article go straight to the reliable databases of information on enzymes using the {{EC number}} template. It is true that we could use text like "X is formed from Y in the reaction catalysed by the enzyme Z EC 2.7.6.1. but I don't believe it is correct to remove the templates entirely, as you did. To your point on alcohol dehydrogenase being able to catalyse a reaction of primary or secondary alcohols that's absolutely true: in the view of an organic chemist they are the same reaction, just on different substrates, and that's precisely what the EC number suggests. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael D. Turnbull: That sentence I am okay with. However, we're talking about substrate pages; I do not see a reason to include EC codes for the enzymes on the page of the substrate. The enzyme name is listed, if you want to know more about it and the reaction, that is why the specific page exists. It does not need all be crammed in there, esp. with the template.

As for the link, I've already sent that and it says "The complete contents of Enzyme Nomenclature, 1992 (plus subsequent supplements and other changes) are listed below in enzyme number order giving just the recommended name. Each entry provides a link to details of that enzyme. Alternatively if looking for a specific reaction used in the classification of enzymes the broad outline defined by the first two numbers are given below." It might be a classification scheme, but it still comes from enzyme nomenclature, not reaction nomenclature (as there is no such thing, to my knowledge).

The point with alcohol dehydrogenase completely invalidates the point you're making about the reactions, however. Enzymes with the same EC number catalyzing multiple different reactions (or similar reactions of different substrates) mean that you cannot use the number to define a specific reaction. At best, you can say it is a "dehydration" or "dexarboxylation", but you do not need to use the EC number for that at all. I still stand by the removal of that specific sentence and if you want, you can write them back in the format you proposed in your last reply ("X is formed from Y in the reaction catalysed by the enzyme Z

talk) 13:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

OK, I'm happy with your view that the enzyme's name/page link gives readers enough information. In those cases where I think it helpful to use the template in addition (not on the specific cases you altered yesterday), I'll use the XYZ wording that we have consensus for. Mike Turnbull (talk) 13:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,055		Nucleotide (talk)	Add sources
920		Source code (talk)	Add sources
7		Orotidine 5'-monophosphate (talk)	Add sources
3		5-Formamidoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribotide (talk)	Add sources
117		Code of law (talk)	Add sources
840		Alexander von Humboldt (talk)	Add sources
222		Anomer (talk)	Cleanup
230		Fluorophore (talk)	Cleanup
32		Purinergic signalling (talk)	Cleanup
78		Tenofovir alafenamide (talk)	Expand
6		CAPRISA 004 (talk)	Expand
64		Expanded genetic code (talk)	Expand
82		Non-proteinogenic amino acids (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
20		Adenosine monophosphate deaminase deficiency type 1 (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
157		Selenocysteine (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
186		Isotopes of nitrogen (talk)	Merge
399		Topical medication (talk)	Merge
1,326		Rust shooting incident (talk)	Merge
470		Acetyl-CoA (talk)	Wikify
8		Cardioprotection (talk)	Wikify
60		Physical organic chemistry (talk)	Wikify
2		Fumarate lyase (talk)	Orphan
2		Gua Operon (talk)	Orphan
6		Purinosome (talk)	Orphan
4		Nucleoside-diphosphatase (talk)	Stub
22		Homoserine (talk)	Stub
5		5-Hydroxyisourate (talk)	Stub
10		Phosphoribosylaminoimidazolesuccinocarboxamide synthase (talk)	Stub
5		Aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (talk)	Stub
2		5′-Phosphoribosyl-4-carboxy-5-aminoimidazole (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KingisNitro! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:10, Monday, September 12, 2022 (

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]