User talk:Kraose
Welcome
|
Terrorism vs terrorist
Thanks. That's embarrassing, I meant terrorism of course. Doug Weller talk 17:18, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Adding non-existent categories
You shouldn't add red-linked categories as you did eg here per
Breaking links
This move has broken numerous links between articles, creating more problems than it has solved. Who's gonna repair them? @Johnbod: --Ghirla-трёп- 06:56, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Gnomes will - plus I've done a few. The disam page has picked up a tag, which will alert the gnomes. Actually there aren't that many, and they aren't actually broken, they just take you via the new disam page, and are in Russian contexts where it will be clear which is the right choice. Most in fact should strictly be changed to say "State" or "Lomonosov" (and these still redirect to St P). Johnbod (talk) 14:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Morgan Creek Entertainment Group Requested Move
The Morgan Creek Entertainment Group move request to Morgan Creek Entertainment was closed, and I wish to discuss the consensus before opening a move review. Please see additional links/proof to support the move request from Morgan Creek Entertainment Group to Morgan Creek Entertainment: Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Morgan Creek Website, and IMDb Pro. Morgan Creek is commonly referred to as Morgan Creek Entertainment and Morgan Creek in various secondary sources, so guidance under common name shouldn't hold much weight. I'm hoping there is a way to resolve this. Taylor-winnie-bk (talk) 23:59, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Read WP:COMMONNAME, you have to weigh upon reliable sources that are independent from the subject. Kraose (talk) 10:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)]
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Kraose. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Closure of discussions
Kraose, I noticed that you recently returned from about an year-long hiatus from wikipedia and over the last three days have closed over 50 move requests and RFCs. I found some of these to be problematic. Would you mind taking a break from this activity for now? Abecedare (talk) 06:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- FYI, I have posted at the Administrators' Noticeboard requesting that your recent closures be reviewed. You are welcome to respond there, if you wish. Abecedare (talk) 06:58, 6 May 2020 (UTC)]
- Regarding Talk:Indigenous Aryans#Request for comment: IA/OoI is a fringe theory, the RfC-question was
Should the article say in the lede that the Indigenous Aryans / Out of India theory is a fringe theory as in the suggestion below?
- I stringly urge you to change
Extensive discussion has been made whether the subject should be called 'fringe'. There is no consensus to modify the existing text.
- into
Extensive discussion has been made whether the subject should be called 'fringe' in the lead. There is no consensus to modify the existing text of the lead to mention the term "fringe" there.
- to reflect the RfC-question correctly, and avoid misunderstandings. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Regarding
More closure discussions
Kraose, you closed a contentious RfC on The People's of Mujahedin of Iran talk page. Last year, you also participated in a contentious ANI report about "Iranian opposition articles" that also involved this article. Per
- I also ask that you withdraw your closure. I am disappointed by the fact that you dismissed, as you say,
"makes better sense", "look very similar" and "the content is related"
aspoor arguments
; those are of course decent reasons why two sections of an article should be merged. In any event, you closed a 10-6 discussion for the side with 6 participants;WP:BADNAC says that you should refrain from closing RfCs where]outcome is a close call (especially where there are several valid outcomes) or likely to be controversial
, and I think closing in the >40% minority is certainly a "close call" in pretty much every case. I hope you will consider reversing your closure in the near future. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Alex-h (talk) 13:54, 26 August 2020 (UTC)