User talk:Kvng/Archive 3

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi, thank you for your consideration and comments. There is a CT.com article cited in the first paragraph that is about the organization (as opposed to being a mention of its work or comments), and CT.com is an independent news organization owned by Tribune - a major national and regional news organization. Does that address your request about having one independent article about the organization?

There is also the Fox Business interview segment, which is about the organization and its role as a whole, and just begins with its latest news at that time. Currently I have that citation within the discussion of one of TINA.org's investigations, but if it would be helpful, I could add that citation to the opening paragraph as well.

There is one other news report on I'm aware of on WSJ Radio about the organization itself, which I did not include and I could add that up top if it would help; I did not do so initially as I thought it would be redundant, but perhaps I erred on that. Any additional guidance sincerely appreciated. Thanks again. RayPellecchia (talk) 15:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. It looks like I may have missed something in my review. I will try to find time again soon to take another look. Please add the WSJ Radio source and resubmit. No need to move sources around unless it improves the article to do so. ~KvnG 15:50, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

OK, I have resubmitted. I added the WSJ Radio source; please note, the original link to the story on WCBS-AM's website appears to be broken, and I've notified that site. In the interim I linked to the same report as it appears on TINA.org's site. You can see for yourself that the report is real; that's Joe Connolly's voice and original report for sure. When and if WCBS fixes the original, I'll replace the TINA link with the WCBS link. I also added the Fox Business TV report as a source for the first sentence of the article, which it truly does support. I hope you can accept the article as amended; if not, please let me know what else I can do. Thanks again for your constructive comments and responsiveness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RayPellecchia (talk • contribs) 17:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC) (Beg pardon, I forgot the signature.) RayPellecchia (talk) 17:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for accepting the article. I will continue to work to improve it. Again, I sincerely appreciate your helpfulness and responsiveness. RayPellecchia (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Day_zee14 Day zee14 (talk) 12:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

The Low Countries as seen from space Hello, Kvng. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement 's weekly selection: Low Countries Previous selections: Gopher (animal) Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 01:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Dear Kvng,

I do not understand why you have removed my modifications to the

MarcBoyerONERA (talk) 07:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

MarcBoyerONERA, My objection was primarily to your "also known as Packet-by-packet Generalized Processor Sharing or Packetised Generalized Processor Sharing (PGPS)" addition. It tangled things with Generalized processor sharing and made it unclear what the article is about. ~KvnG 01:17, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

I'm trying to get this article on Neutrolin published because I believe it's a very significant advance in medicine that has not been sufficiently recognized. My most recent version was rejected because it did not follow the general guideline on notability. However, 5 out of the 6 references I cite are completely independent of the product or the company. They are studies done by independent investigators, in most cases, in academic settings. These sources are so independent that they do not even name the drug product anywhere in the article. I do not understand why this simple, straightforward article is being rejected on these grounds.

Thank you.

Markak1515 (talk) 05:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)markak1515

My comment with this review was that the potentially

notable topic at this point here is the taurolidine-citrate lock solution or somesuch, not the Neutrolin brand name. ~KvnG

13:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Markak1515 (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)markak1515

To accept the article, we need to establish notability of the topic. The topic of the proposed article is the brand. ~KvnG 16:41, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

I guess we are at an impasse then, because Neutrolin IS the topic of the article. Yes it is a brand, but I don't see why that is relevant. There is a Wikipedia page for Coca Cola, Enbrel, Nike, for almost any brand you can think of in any industry. I can't very well write an article entitled "catheter lock solutions that contain citrate, heparin, and taurolidine." That would be like writing an article on Enbrel with a title that lists the entire formulation buffer of the drug. Honestly, I used to donate to Wikipedia and believed in the cause. My experience with this article is that editors just put up as many roadblocks as possible, most of which are not valid and just waste everyone's time. I'm done re-writing the article so you can either do your job and approve it as a valuable and impartial contribution to the encyclopedia or you can drop it. If you drop it, it's on you and this little nugget of knowledge (that could actually save someone's life) will be lost.

Markak1515 (talk) 02:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)markak1515

We are not stuck. Here are some options for you.

1. You resubmit the article as is and another reviewer will have a look at it in due course
2. I can post something to
   Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Reviewer_help
   requesting a review of my review
3. You can revise the article and resubmit and another reviewer will have a look at it in due course
4. You can copy the article to main space, bypassing
   deletion process

I'm happy to help you with any of these. Let me know how you'd like to proceed. ~KvnG 02:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

A proposal has been made to create a Live Feed to enhance the processing of Articles for Creation and Drafts. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC to create a 'Special:NewDraftsFeed' system. Your comments are welcome. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Always more notability , if you don't believe my references , please delete the page of this old artist  and let those who haven't references , many months ago , after many corrections

always same problem .

Best  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belmadani Elmadani (talk • contribs) 00:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 

The submission will be automatically deleted in 6 months assuming no one edits it further. ~KvnG 00:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

This staircase is an impossible object Hello, Kvng. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement 's weekly selection: Impossible object Previous selections: Life sciences • Low Countries Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Waves Audio may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Waves Audio - Technical GRAMMY Award recipient, 2011.<ref>[[cite web |url=http://www.grammy.com/news/technical-grammy-award-waves-audio-ltd |title=Technical
• audio-ltd |title=Technical GRAMMY Award: Waves Audio Ltd. |date=2011-02-11 |accessdate=2014-02-13}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.prosoundweb.com/article/waves_audio_to_receive_technical_

Thanks,

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sampling (signal processing) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }
• Nyquist rate of ''B'', because all of its non-zero frequency content is shifted into the interval [-B/2, B/2).

Thanks,

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

) 00:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

This week's

article for improvement

(week 8, 2014)

Model of a German SAR-Lupe reconnaissance satellite inside a Cosmos-3M rocket Hello, Kvng. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement 's weekly selection: Reconnaissance satellite Previous selections: Life sciences Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Start frame delimiter article

Hello there! Regarding your edit on the

Please see Talk:Start frame delimiter#Frames and packets for my response. ~KvnG 00:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Hej Kvng. I got your comments about the article I am trying to submit. Is there any specific part of the article that requires more references? All best Gorzowianka (talk) 12:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Can you please include a link to the article submission you're referring to? ~KvnG 15:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

An example of the human skeleton Hello, Kvng. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement 's weekly selection: Human skeleton Previous selections: Reconnaissance satellite • Impossible object Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Thanks Kvng for reviewing and accepting the topic I wrote about on Universal cards. I appreciate your hard work.

UBrandon (talk)

Dear Kvng,

Your suggestion for working is existing space is taken by me. I might want to add my work in the Spacetime wikipedia article. How will I know how much of my work to add from Time Correction articles for creation? And what steps do I take next?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Time_correction

User:MAgravat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magravat (talk • contribs) 18:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

You can

WP:OWN

are issues you may encounter if you take this approach. Wikipedia can be a bit hostile. Don't take it personally. Don't overreact.

The other option is to post a message and link to your draft on the Spacetime discussion page. Ask other editors what portions of your material may be appropriate for inclusion in Spacetime.

Good luck. ~KvnG 19:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

I'll put

WP:WATCHLIST and help out if I can. ~KvnG

23:26, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, 72.186.69.232 (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Magaravt72.186.69.232 (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

It looks like you pasted your draft material into the talk page without any explanation of your intentions or any proposal for how to integrate the material into the article. You can try again but don't include the material, just include a link to the material, Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Time_correction. Explain your intentions and describe how the material would be integrated into the existing article. ~KvnG 15:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Dear Kvng,

My article on time correction has been suggested by you to be moved to other topics spacetime, time dilation, faster than light anomoly...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Time_correction I put my section there in spacetime talk section and they said this is not the sight for discussions go to reference desk. Is there still a chance to get the work done in wikipedia? Did they see my note to consider my work?

Thank you,

Magravat (talk) 21:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC)MAgravatMagravat (talk) 21:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Dear Kvng, Is there some list of Journals I can submit to so I can have a reliable secondary... reference? If there is please let me know please.

Thank you,

mphmba 12:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Magravatmphmba 12:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magravat (talk • contribs)

@

wp:secondary sources. You will probably have to be patient for a few years before that happens. Cheers - DVdm (talk

) 13:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Articles for Creation barnstar
		A barnstar to you for reviewing at least 175 submissions during the WikiProject Articles for creation December 2013 - January 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks for contributing to the backlog elimination drive! Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 11:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks so much for creating an additional link to the bipolar disorder in children talk page to generate more discussion! It did not occur to me at all, and I'm glad you think that this is something worth discussing more about! Cheers! Ongmianli (talk) 22:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello Kvng:

WikiProject AFC is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our

AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

Hello Kvng, thanks so much for your review - I know it's been crazy trying to clear the backlog! As per your review, I have responded to possibly merging the page with the bipolar disorder in children page: please see my comments here. As you will see, I have suggested for the page to stay as a standalone page with links to the pediatric bipolar disorder page.

I had a question though: it looks like the editor page does not seem to be very active, and I really do want to push this project along. What do I do with my submission? I'd really like to have it not deleted... spent hours on all of this! :) Let me know what I can do to move this forward... Ongmianli (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

AfC submissions are subject to deletion 6 months after they are last edited. My understanding is that you will be warned before it is deleted. You are also welcome to keep a copy of your submission as a

WP:USERSUBPAGE. ~KvnG

23:18, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the quick response! Assuming that editor response on the bipolar disorder in children page is poor, how do I go about revising and resubmitting my page? That being said, I sure don't want to be wasting another editor's time! Let me know your thoughts! Ongmianli (talk) 20:35, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

You just make any changes you think are necessary and hit the Resubmit button at the top of the page. After it works its way through the backlog, another editor will look at it for you. If you don't have the patience for that, you have the option to bypass

the teahouse and seek help. ~KvnG

15:55, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the detailed and thoughtful comments on how to move this forward! Yes, I don't want to be wasting any editor's time - and want to do anything I can to make sure this makes the article space without being deleted. I will check out the Teahouse and see what I can do. Thanks again - you're doing a wonderful job! Ongmianli (talk) 08:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

I've created a longer and more substantial article at Lambda Literary Award for Gay Fiction, which lists the winners and nominees for the award instead of just the winners by themselves — and I've also advised the AFC submitter that a longer article is now in place. I'm not sure what the process is for the AFC submission from here, but feel free to delete or redirect or merge it or whatever. Bearcat (talk) 03:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. You recently reviewed and declined my article on the military cyber professionals association and cited a lack of 3rd party references and provided me a link that explains what those are. I followed the link and it said that good independent 3rd party sources include articles by journalists as part of their reporting work. I'm not sure if you noticed, but my article includes 3 separate press articles about this nonprofit, including note of its significance. This is not my first contribution and I'm beginning to feel as though my article is being unfairly treated because some people think people in the military are bad. I kindly ask you to take another look at it and please help me with rewording or any kind of editing suggestions. However, the significance of the organization has been noted by 3 press articles independent of the organization. Please be a good person and help :)

I think that review was a while ago. I'd be happy to have another look. Please leave me a link to the submission. ~KvnG 02:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

This was recently proposed for deletion. You accepted it from AFC awhile back.

The criteria for accepting an

WP:AFC reviews. ~KvnG

02:13, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

@Smartse: what do you make of those 3 references? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

I'd say that those are about StyleSeek rather than Spalding. Feel free to send it to AFD though - I just prodded it as a way of saving time and effort. SmartSE (talk) 11:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

I apologize for my excessive reaction to your glyphosate edit last week. I've been working on cleaning up some of the non-MEDRS compliant citations and some other problems, and inappropriately jumped into defensive mode. I'll do better in the future

I just wanted to let you know that I was not the original creator of this article; the creator was Nrevans (already notified). I understand you used the

AfC helper script, which must have detected my edits. I myself have had this issue before, so this is just a reminder to check the history and notify the appropriate users. Thank you Anon126 (talk - contribs

Thanks so much, VZBob (talk) 21:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for contacting me. Is this a complete rewrite or was it based in any way on Verizon#History? ~KvnG 21:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Kvng, this was a complete rewrite, although another editor has now checked over the draft and moved it into place, so this is done! Thanks so much, VZBob (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Super Bit Mapping may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Audio mastering|master recording]] into a 16-bit signal nearly without sound quality loss, using [[noise shaping to improve [[signal to noise ratio]] over the frequency bands most acutely perceived

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hello Kvng, I'm here onbehalf of

Hello Kvng,

WikiProject Orphanage is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive to de-orphan articles which have orphan tags!
The goal is to eliminate the backlog of orphan articles. There are currently 58623 articles which have orphan tags. The drive is running from April 12, 2014 to May 12, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all editors participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. To add your name in the participants list click here.
So start de-orphaning articles! Click here to see the list of articles need de-orphaning.
Visit Suggestions for how to de-orphan an article to know more!

Thanks.

WikiProject Orphanage through MediaWiki message delivery (talk

) 15:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Is it possible to have my February 2014 article reinstated so that I can remove the copyrighted material? I really don't want to retype everything again. Thanks.21:28, 22 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceedeeo (talk • contribs)

It is possible. We need the exact title of the article you're referring to and it would also help to have the user name of the administrator that deleted the page. I am not an administrator so could not have been the one who deleted the page. I am probably the one who marked it as a possible copyright violation. ~KvnG 23:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Kvng,

I have recently nominated OSIP, a page that you accepted in the AfC process, for deletion. It seems to me that this article was accepted without sufficient coverage in outside sources. If you disagree, please feel free to comment on OSIP's AfD entry.

Thanks,

TheCascadian 02:43, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

You have one or more pages in Category:Pending AfC submissions being reviewed now with your name on them. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, some time ago I sent you few comments about your decision not to publish the article about Thomas Concrete Group, but I havent received any answer from you. Could you please let me know how can we proceed with the article? All best, Kasia Gorzowianka (talk) 07:46, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

@

notability of the topic. First find the references and then we can figure out where to put them. Keep in mind that not all topics are worthy of coverage on Wikipedia. ~KvnG

01:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

The article List of programs that open TS files has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards for stand-alone lists. We already have Comparison of video player software which includes breakdown by format.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  05:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

	Barnstar for de-orphaning articles
	Thank you for your efforts to de-orphan articles, Although we are unsuccessful to make a dent on the huge backlog, but your efforts to de-orphan articles are very much appreciated. Happy editing! -- From: WikiProject Orphanage through MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 09:24, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you for reviewing my changes to linear systems https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linear_system&oldid=prev&diff=607022811 However I think the current version is really confusion. You reverted the changes based on the idea that I was introducing a different y(t). But that is not the case if you look at the two equations that use y_1 and y_2. If you think the linear spring as the linear system, then these y_1 and y_2 are the applied forcesand that was exactly the y(t) I introduced. Additionally the condition "Letting y(t) = 0" is completely unnecessary and indeed confusing... What is the output then? if it is supposed to be always 0? The spring viewed as a input out linear system int he way the example wants to show it is indeed a system that maps trajectories (inputs) into forces (outputs). In this sense I think my explanation is far more consistent that the current one. Can we have an explanation that rescue the best of both versions?

Thanks Kakila (talk) 16:43, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I have posted a copy of this to Talk:Linear_system#Reviewing_some_reverts. Hopefully we can resolve the issue there. ~KvnG 13:46, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2008 FIBA Europe Under-16 Championship may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[2008 FIBA Europe Under-16 Championship Division C

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Thank you for your note. I have removed the prod tag, since, as a former first-class cricketer, Aftab passes WP:BIO. Bobo. 23:21, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

OK. It would be good to add some

reliable sources to the article then remove the {{Notability}} tag. Otherwise this is likely to happen again. ~KvnG

14:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

I thought you should be aware of this and this if you're not already. The user describes himself in LinkedIn as Retina-X's Online Marketing Executive. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear Kvng,

you accepted my article Daig (Switzerland) via AfC and rated it as Start-Class at the time. It has been expanded significantly in the meantime. Would you mind having a look at it and maybe give me a hint as to what parts still need work? Thanks a lot in advance, -- Hisredrighthand ^{⚔Tally-ho!⚔} 17:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Wow, nice work! I've upped the rating to C. For tips and help improving further I'd suggest you have a look at

WP:PR. ~KvnG

20:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Hi Kvng,

I noticed that you and others started work on a leaflet for Wikiproject computing that we would show at Wikimania 2014. If you (or anybody over at Wikiproject Computing) are still interested in doing this, then the deadline to submit your leaflet is 1st July 2014.

Kind regards,
Adikhajuria (talk) 15:25, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Kvng! In January you made some improvements to the above draft article, but unfortunately another user copy-pasted the unimproved text to mainspace (Akari Endo). Would you consider doing the same fix on the mainspace article? Your version is better, but I don't want to do it myself for reasons of attribution. —Anne Delong (talk) 03:53, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ground loop (electricity) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the possibility of radio frequency interference (RF) since the shield may act as an antenna).{{Dubious Another solution is to use [[isolation transformer]]s, [[opto-isolator]]s, or [[balun]]s to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hello, Kvng. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 13:39, 11 July 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm

}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 13:39, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Good evening Kvng and thanks for reviewing the article i submitted. You asked for more independent references to the subject of the article, other than her books and films. Would these references besuitable? They either speak exclusively of Fathy's work or discuss it in the context of that of other people's.

Thanks for your help

D'ailleurs Derrida Reviewed' by: Reginald Lilly The French Review, Vol. 77, No. 2 (Dec., 2003), pp. 393-395

An Arabian Night in Germany Theodore Ziolkowski World Literature Today, Vol. 78, No. 2 (May - Aug., 2004), pp. 32-33

Once and for All Samuel Weber Grey Room, No. 20 (Summer, 2005), pp. 105-116

D'Ailleurs, Derrida (Derrida Elsewhere) by Safaa Fathy; Mille Gilles (A Thousand Gilles) by Ijsbrand van Veelen Brigitte Weltman-Aron Discourse, Vol. 30, No. 1/2, Special Issue: "Who?" or "What?" —Jacques Derrida (Winter & Spring 2008), pp. 255-272

Enfances du texte Éric Prenowitz Rue Descartes, No. 32, Obstétriques de la littérature: Poétiques des différences sexuelles (Juin 2001), pp. 95-110

Gravesend COLE SWENSEN Edition: 1 Publisher: University of California Press (June 2012) Tourner autour MIREILLE CALLE-GRUBER Littérature, No. 142, LA DIFFÉRENCE SEXUELLE EN TOUS GENRES (JUIN 2006), pp. 88-101

Who Was Jacques Derrida?: An Intellectual Biography DAVID MIKICS Publisher: Yale University Press (December 2009)

In Memory of Jacques Derrida Nicholas Royle Publisher: Edinburgh University Press (March 2009)

WIR GESPENSTER oder WER, WENN WIR SPRECHEN, SPRICHT: Zu Marie Darrieussecqs Roman "White" Martina Stemberger Romanische Forschungen, 122. Bd., H. 1 (2010), pp. 54-69

Le Veilleur Nicolas Brauche, Cadrage, juin 2008 "Fathy recasts Eisenstein's semantic method (refonte de la méthode sémantique d'Eisenstein)".

Promotepoetry (talk) 22:29, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

@

WP:AUTHOR. There are specific and more rigorous notability requirements for authors documented on that page and I did not believe this submission met those requirements. The references currently in the article merely demonstrate that she's a published author with a body of work. It is not clear to me that these new references go beyond that but I encourage you to add them to the article and resubmit it. Don't be afraid of it being rejected and don't take it personally if it is. ~KvnG

23:47, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

• Mpq1 (talk · contribs)
  • Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pennsylvania State University School of Hospitaility Management (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

The errors you stated previously have been cleaned up and quite a bit of the content was removed to make the page better. I have used pages from our peers as a reference such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Harrah_College_of_Hotel_Administration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornell_University_School_of_Hotel_Administration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_State_University_School_of_Hospitality_Business https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilton_College_of_Hotel_and_Restaurant_Management

Please look at the page and make recommendations. This is the first page I have submitted and I am trying my best to follow the Wikipedia guidelines.

Mpq1 (talk) 21:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations! It looks like another editor has accepted your submission. ~KvnG 23:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

• 209.179.100.83 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dry Micro Chip fuel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

8 August 2014: We lack (and need) a succinct answer to what must be added/changed to this material to address the "notability" and/or other issues cited for the rejection. I should point out that we do have several references listed, and I am giving a paper on the subject at the IT3 (International Thermal Treatment Technology) Conference October 14/15 in Baltimore, MD.

Regards, Tom McGowan President, TMTS Associates, Inc. [email protected] 404 627 4722 209.179.100.83 (talk) 17:05, 8 August 2014 (UTC) 209.179.100.83 (talk) 17:05, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Response at [[5]] ~KvnG 03:44, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I have tended to use PROD for new unpatrolled articles - if an article has been around for a while I will AfD it. I will try use PROD more Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the