User talk:KyuuA4

Hi. When you recently edited History of the National Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cleveland Tigers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for

Please refrain from removing original texts without any particular reasons, and adding obviously wrong information, without any references. Thank you. 220.156.86.186 (talk) 16:46, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know how to distinguish 3 vs 4. So, I'll admit to carelessness. But again, get a username. As for references, Japanese Wikipedia is not a valid reference. However, I am allowing to keep those for now, because the Japanese articles do have valid articles within them; unfortunately, my ability to read Japanese is extremely basic. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 00:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As for me, I have never talked to some specific person commenting out in the article, but added the comments as general explanations. When you read and understand the notice in the template above, please do not repeat it and do not make someone else to remove your talk. Thanks. 220.156.86.26 (talk) 17:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add the following wrong content.

Each yaku has an equivalent han value.

You know one kind of yaku often has more than one han. Please fix it and do not do it again. 220.156.1.33 (talk) 17:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot write strategies of mahjong in the articles, because Wikipedia is

As to the ready hand, the section of Advantages and risks can be deleted, which was first written by some other editors. I'll leave that section for now if it helps. One reason is that there are similar descriptions in the Japanese article. For the reason above, you can remove it whenever you like. 220.156.1.236 (talk) 18:05, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That material was long there before I even touched the article; but I agree. It shouldn't be there. Yet, it can be rephrased to describe the game conditions under riichi. So, we'll figure something out, on what to do with it. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 20:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reading through that section, it was acceptable to simply wipe out the sub-section, because the statements in those sections were already mentioned above it. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 21:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chess strategy. Strategy article on chess. Though that game is chock full of publications and examinations on the game's strategy. Mahjong? Not so much. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 23:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just saying hello from the Wikipedia side of things :)

AngusWOOF (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, what's the "policy" regarding copying some text into anime related Wikia, or other Wiki based sites? Would there be a problem at all upon doing this? The advantage is two-fold: (1) copy-text may serve as a back up to the original article(s), and (2) writing styles within Wikia do not necessarily need to conform with

It's not a matter of policy, it's a matter of law. The text of Wikipedia articles is available under the

CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. Cheers, Goodraise 09:23, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Copy-pasted own inquiry KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 10:17, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. LeadSongDog come howl! 23:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikuru Asahina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markus Shedletsky (talk • contribs) 19:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I having a problem with user Innermokaluv at the Future Diary article. Innermokaluv keeps putting on the article that the Future Diary Redial OVA is non-canon. I keep telling the user that unless there's facts from the official sources that says the OVA is non-canon, this is nothing more than fan speculation. However, despite how many times i told the user why i remove this info, the user keeps putting it back. --FonFon Alseif (talk) 12:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd give it a day or a week; but if he does continually persist, then I'll recommend a request for a short term

semi-protect. And I never did watch this series, though I may actually add it to my backlog - watch for later. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 00:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Sorry to bother you again. I'm afraid user Innermokaluv is at it again at the Future Diary article but this time he/she is trying to make the OVA sound like some comedy spin-off when actually the funny scenes are very few with most of the OVA being drama. Looks like a

semi-protect might make Innermokaluv stop.--FonFon Alseif (talk) 14:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! I am contacting you because although we've likely never Wikied together, I did mention you in a proposal at Template talk:Infobox Television and I wanted to invite you to express your thoughts. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:34, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article

this is not notable, there also is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FIFA_World_Cup_goalscorers and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIFA_World_Cup_top_goalscorers

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koppapa (talk) 20:48, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Antigng (talk) 06:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! The Regenstein Library at the University of Chicago is hosting an edit-a-thon to celebrate Women's History Month on Saturday, March 28th from 10 AM to 4 PM. Coffee and lunch is provided for free, and we'll be focusing on building a few biographical and organizational articles. We'll also have full access to archival resources maintained by the Special Collections and Research Center. If you're interested in joining us, please RSVP at the event page here! Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(

Hey KyuuA4-- I wanted to personally let you know that we're moving this event to a Saturday date in April. Between April 4th and 25th, does either date work well for you? Thanks, I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 18:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey folks! We've got two exciting edit-a-thons happening in Chicago during the third week of April:

• Regenstein Library at the University of Chicago edit-a-thon on Wednesday, April 15th from 4 PM - 8 PM
• Pritzker Military Museum & Library edit-a-thon on Saturday, April 18th from 10 AM - 3:30 PM

If you're interested in meeting up and working together with other Wikipedians at these fantastic institutions, please RSVP at the event pages linked above. If you know someone else interested in learning about or editing Wikipedia, invite them! We will provide training and resources for new editors at both events. For questions about the events, please refer to the event pages or contact I JethroBT (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(

Hi, I'm Bobtinin. KyuuA4, thanks for creating 2016 in American soccer!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for making the article. Remember to keep the same format as the predecessor article (i.e 2015 in American soccer.) I know that some information may not have been released, but it needs more categories. Keep up the good work.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ University of Chicago on October 15! (drop-in any time, 3-7pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Come join us on Saturday, March 5th between 12PM - 5PM for the Art+Feminism 2016 edit-a-thon at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago! We'll be focusing our efforts on women involved in the arts, and a list of articles for artists in Chicago and the U.S. Midwest has been compiled at the project page. The event is free, but only if you register at the project page ahead of time. I'll be there, and I hope to see you there too! I JethroBT (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rozen Maiden characters (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 09:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the here !

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KyuuA4. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I'm hosting a meetup at the at the Sulzer Regional Library on Saturday March 25th from 12 PM to 4:30 PM. You're welcome to come and work together with other editors on articles or other contributions, get to know other editors around Chicago, and ask any questions you might about using or contributing to Wikipedia. Food will be available, and we'll likely go out for dinner afterwards as a group. If you're interested in joining us, please RSVP at the event page here! Thanks, I JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 20:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tenhou.net for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on

Hello, KyuuA4. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating

A

COuld you please solve the references, they haven't come out right.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:53, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KyuuA4. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Examining the Arbitration link in the above will show that having an infobox is not standard. Johnuniq (talk) 07:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KyuuA4. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know that generally, an editor's comments should not be altered by others. However, there is always the exception that proves the rule. I've amended your comments at

Get back there. :p — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sburstall (talk • contribs) 14:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]