User talk:LAUGH90

Hello, LAUGH90. You have new messages at HexaChord's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello LAUGH90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! NMChico24 02:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply ] Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Please do not remove content from articles and then replace it afterwards; this makes it seem you are taking credits for other members' contributions to the article. --LBM | TALK TO ME

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Raven-Symoné. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. LBM | TALK TO ME 17:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shame on you!Raven Symone is the 2nd greatest female celeb in the whole world.She's like a sister.lol-- Cute 1 4 u 18:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you were interested in having more Even Stevens screenshots put on

I haven't watched the show so what I would love for you to do is go to my

talk page

and explain the four screenshots on each ultimatedisney.com page and mention which episode they go with like this.

http://www.ultimatedisney.com/thatssoraven-makeover.html

1. Raven dressed as a mummy because whatever. Pin Pals

2. Eddie and whoever in the kitchen. Dues and Don'ts

3. Raven and some lady. Adventures in Boss Sitting

4. Chelsea talking into a shoe. Hook Up My Space

Ideally you would do it for these pages:

http://www.ultimatedisney.com/thatssoraven-makeover.html

http://www.ultimatedisney.com/thatssoraven-houseparty.html

http://www.ultimatedisney.com/thatssoraven-supernaturally.html

http://www.ultimatedisney.com/thatssoraven-disguise.html

If you can help me with this I can add 16 images! -

Peregrinefisher 00:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks. I was able to add 6 images to season 3. I'm ready for more whenever you are. -

Peregrinefisher 21:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

That's ten more! Keep'em coming. p.s. Would you like me to fix up yor user page for you? -

Peregrinefisher 01:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

• Well, if you can thanks for the help!LAUGH90 01:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you like oranges. -

Peregrinefisher 04:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I added those 2 images. Keep them coming. -

Peregrinefisher 20:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I put up the

Peregrinefisher 02:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

• Thanks Very Much!LAUGH90 03:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Keep'em coming. -

Peregrinefisher 16:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Whoops! I didn't look at what they were called. ;-) -

Peregrinefisher 04:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I added five of those. I couldn't get

Escape Claus- Raven, Eddie, and Chelsea posing with Santa Claus/Mr. Petracelli to work. Keep'em coming, were almost halfway there. -

Peregrinefisher 00:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Wanna keep adding raven images? There's lots here. What I'd really like is to be able to finish the first season's images. - Peregrine Fisher 19:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to apologize to you for the block; I was confused by the

• Hey, I know that you've been on The Cheetah Girls (girl group) before and I was wondering, somebody screwed up all of the singles (like that little box thingy w/ all the charting numbers) and I cannot figure out how to put it back! If you can, please help me!

Thanks,Jtervin 00:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Hello, and

Talk:Dixie Chicks. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Xiner (talk, email) 20:29, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I took the liberty of adding the cover image for the video game. QuasyBoy 1:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Please never add negative material concerning living people (such as those you alleged had/have an eating disorder in your edit) without citing

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, LAUGH90! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove

Your addition of Christina Vidal and Raven-Symone being waitresses has been reverted. We can find no verifiable source for this information, and regardless the roles are not notable enough to list with the main cast and crew. Please feel free to discuss this on the talk page. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 20:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I looked it up in the other articles and saw the other numbers. If you've looking it up at the RIAA site (and others), that's fine with me -- but it should be consistent across all the articles. BTW, I didn't "put" the numbers in there -- I reverted what appeared to be a mistake on your part. Since it appears to be my mistake -- I'm sorry about that. -- ArglebargleIV 21:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

However, I moved the 2000 and 2001 albums that were in the 1990s section back to the 2000s. And corrected a spelling mistake -- I think those were undone when you reverted. -- ArglebargleIV 21:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, LAUGH90! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove

Could pls fix these music tables. I'm still learning, that is why I'm not fixing it. After this edit some 1 deleted it, but I think the international releases should remain on the discography. Thx. Lilkunta 21:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Please sign your comments. Okay? - Chsf 17:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unconfirmed DCOM movies. Lord Hawk 21:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Where is the proof? DCOM is not the same as a Disney movie. Lord Hawk 21:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the sources I have.LAUGH90 21:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC) That site is not verifiable, plus Cheetah Girls 3 is not a DCOM. Lord Hawk 21:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• What are you talking about? The source is a press release and the Cheetah Girls 3 IS a DCOM.LAUGH90 21:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You won't get far as those movies have been deleted by admins already on the basis on speculation with or without your rumor sites. Those sources are not valid. I am not the only editor to revert your edits. Look back at the comments on your edits that have been reverted by other editors. Lord Hawk 00:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop re-adding these movies. Laughingplace is not an official source. Nor can we add anything for 2008 yet. 2007 isn't even half way through yet. Adding 2008 is basically crystleballism since there's no guarantee that these movie will even see the light of day especially since there hasn't been any official sources from Disney Channel. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Laughingplace is not an official source. Just because some of the things they say come true doesn't mean everything will be. Fan sites are not reliable sources. Official sources (Disney commercials, news articles, ect) for both HSM2 and Johnny Kapahala can be found unlike these. IMDB is not a reliable source as it can be edited by users as well. Though articles on IMDB are generally true it is not 100% true. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Laughingplace is not endorsed by Disney, nor does it get any real information from Disney. You must know the difference between an official site and a site that is merely gossip and rumors. I was close to allowing you to add Twitches Too as I have allowed IMDB as a reliable source in the past, but I then began to doubt the veriability of IMDB as source by itself without acknowledgement from the movie studios. Lord Hawk 02:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When

I've reverted your edit on

I took back out the date of birth you added for Tracie Spencer; you may not have been aware, but she has been putting 1978 (as opposed to 1976) in the wikticle, and it is not verifiable ~ in fact, as i (and others) have shown on the talk page, 1976 is verifiable. It had been, unofficially, agreed and left alone with no birthdate at all. Hope you don't mind, thanks. Cheers, Lindsay 18:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why you keep changing Mariah's birth year from 1970 to 1969, according to Billboard, MTV and AllMusic all say she was born in 1970.

Hey there, I reverted change to her album sales. The article was just semi-protected yesterday because too many IPs inflate record sales without a source. Unless a reliable source can be provided, those figures should stay. Cheers. Spellcast 01:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned repeatedly that you must cite the information that you add to articles. You have been blocked to give you a chance to read the following policies:

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Mariah Carey. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 15:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pls fix this page : Mad discography bc 91.171.238.144 stupidly vandalised it. Thx !

Another editor has added the "{{

Sorry although i us UKmix myself all the time for info it is not a reliable source for wikipedia. Realist2 (talk) 04:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About this, please make sure the info reflects what the source says. Since there's a long history of

Hi. Thanx for your interest in the Lil' Kim article. She was born 1975 not 1974. Please discuss major changes before u do them thank YouMcelite (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep changing the 8.9 to 9? It was 8.9, not 9. Read the sources. --Yankeesrj12 (talk) 00:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At least twice you have inflated the sales figures for this album with no source. Do this again and you will be issued with a formal warning. Sorry, to be blunt, it's just that your talk page history suggestions you fail to listen to polite advise. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 22:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have just done it again, please stop, if you do not have a reliable source for your claim stop clicking your mouse. You must have a source or you will be reverted. Do it again (you have already three times) and you will find your name on an admin notice board. If you don't like rules of wikipedia then don't edit. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 00:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Laugh90. In the article Lil' Kim you changed her birthdate from 1975 to 1974. Please pay attention to references it clearly states by MSN that she was born in 1975 not 74. If you have any questions ask. Have a great day.Mcelite (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your one warning. Do not change the birthdate of musician Lil' Kim. You have consistently changed her birth date when you are told NNDB is not a reliable source. If you continue to do this you will be blocked.Mcelite (talk) 16:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite reliable sources, if you change information with your edits! - Noboyo

A blog is definitely no reliable source!! - Noboyo

Once again: A blog is definitely NO reliable source!! - Noboyo

In hopes of avoiding a

Teenpress.com doesn't meet [[WP:RS].Kww (talk) 20:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing on blogspot meets

Hi. I see you returned to the 3LW article recently and restored the section on Acting Career Turmoil despite the discussion on the Talk Page and the consensus that Cheetah Girls material belongs in the Cheetah Girls article. I'd ask you please not to ignore other editors. If you have a reason you think an incident involving Symone and Bryan (neither of whom were ever members of 3LW) and a Cheetah Girls movie (again, nothing to do with 3LW) should be in the article - you need to come to the Talk Page and convince other editors. Thanks.KD Tries Again (talk) 19:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)KD Tries Again[reply]

Thank you. -- Tcncv (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you disputing the figures on the http://www.8notes.com/biographies/carey.asp source? I've been helping

Thank you for

good faith. Thank you. -- Tcncv (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I think you may agree that the recent contentious editing of sales figures and sources on the

Mariah Carey discography article and related pages have time consuming and counter productive. I have opened new discussion item on the talk page, where hopefully some of the issues can be worked out. Your opinions are requested. Please join the discussion here. Thank you. -- Tcncv (talk) 04:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Charmbracelet. Most British people and many people internationally write dates in day-month-year order, e.g., 12 December 1904. Most Americans use month-day-year order, e.g., December 12, 1904. If the article is about an American topic, use month-day-year. If it is a British or European topic, use day-month-year. If neither, leave it as originally written. Many Americans or British people take offence if an article about their country, written in their local version of English, is changed around to a version they don't use. So please do not do that.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. SEE

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Spectacular! (soundtrack), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

article fails to establish the notability of this album

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

Please include edit summaries when you edit. It helps others to know the jist of your edits. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per

Your recent edit has been reverted due to your replacement of highly reliable sources with fan sites. Do not replace highly reliable sources with sites of this kind either here. In addition, do not enter certifications without providing highly reliable sources. --Harout72 (talk) 15:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Surely you've been editing Wikipedia long enough and have been warned enough times to know that inserting a claim like this [1] requires a reliable source? You can't keep doing this; consider this a final warning. - eo (talk) 19:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeatedly modifying articles without proper reliable sources and/or removing sources, disruptive editing, ignoring Talk Page communication. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- eo (talk) 19:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you still abuse wikipedia's pages by inserting unreferenced sales-figures. Your insertion of 253,000 copies in this edit within the section of Sales and chart performance for which you as usual did not provide a source, has been removed. Bear in mind that your actions will not be tolerated and will be reported as you have a past history of similar behavior. Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 16:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for the revised sales figure on

Article Wizard

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 22:33, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Big Time Rush quote

Why do you keep removing the quote from the reception and criticism section of Big Time Rush? It's appropriate, cited, and does not unbalance the section. See the article's Talk page, and Wikipedia:Edit warring. - Tim1965 (talk) 15:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Given the third-party opinion expressed on the article talk page, do you agree the quote should go back into the article? - Tim1965 (talk) 02:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't agree. We should get another opinion.LAUGH90 (talk) 14:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• You have two third opinions already. - Tim1965 (talk) 13:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Please stop reverting the insertion of the quote. Both netural opinions agree it should belong. The wikproject guidelines say it should belong. - Tim1965 (talk) 23:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of DCOMs

[2] Why did you undo your edit there? Gimmetrow 20:54, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:51ZRc438rFL. SS500 .jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale

.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Demi Dont Forget Front Inter.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale

.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deeper Than Rap

Where r u gettin the 430,000 copies from? The source in the article for that statement says 421,000. If u have a reliable source for 430,000, then add it to the article.

talk) 21:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Power Rangers

Saban is not making a new season of Mighty Morphin Power Rangers. They are making an entirely new show with new footage from the previous Japanese version that would have come after RPM. Please do not assume that when they say "season" they refer to extending a show that is currently airing. I've reverted your edits to Mighty Morphin Power Rangers for this reason. Also, I've reverted your edits to Power Rangers because you changed a number that has been there for a year. The current remastered/reversioned/rerun/rewhatever MMPR began airing in January of this year.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:08, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You need..

..To explain or discuss the reason behind this edit, else I'm gonna report you for vandalising. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you have time and again been reverting to the disagreed content, I have reported you at ANI. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for continuously disrupting Madonna albums discography with edits like this. You have been asked to have a consensus in the talk page before also, but you are failing to do so. Another edit like this, and you will be blocked. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:48, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you to an administrater for failing to discuss your edits when being continuously asked by me and other editors to do so. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aug 05 - 2010

welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

. Thank you.

Madonna albums discography

I've full protected the article for 72 hours. Discuss your disagreement with other editors and come to a conclusion. If I see that you resume the reversions without making an effort to discuss them, I will have to block you for edit warring. Please make good use of the 72 hours to make sure that doesn't happen.—Kww(talk) 05:10, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was a good start, but continuing the reversions here was not. This is your final warning: gain a consensus on the source before you change it again. If you revert that sales figure again without consensus to do so, you'll be blocked.—Kww(talk) 04:15, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Demi Dont Forget Front Inter.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Demi-lovato-official-japanese-cover-thanx-to-mz7590.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for you were warned not to change that figure again without consensus. Instead, you logged out and did it anonymously. You are blocked until you agree to stop changing the sales of "Confession on a Dance Floor" in any article until you get consensus to do so. Any admin can lift this block once the editor has agreed.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 13:41, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I now understand why I was blocked and am now asking to be unblocked.LAUGH90 (talk) 23:25, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I now understand why I was blocked and am now asking to be unblocked.LAUGH90 (talk) 03:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LAUGH90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

• I now understand why I was blocked and am now asking to be unblocked.LAUGH90 (talk) 03:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were given a very easy unblock basis to meet. It was that you "agree to stop changing the sales of "Confession on a Dance Floor" in any article until you get consensus to do so." Stating that you understand your reason for being blocked is non-compliant with this reasonable condition of the blocking admin.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I was just trying to make the article more accurate, with accurate sources. I'm not trying to slander anyone or ruin anyone's work. I was just trying to make the article accurate with accurate sources}}LAUGH90 (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC) {{unblock|I still don't get it. If I put a more reliable source from her label, Live Nation, and Billboard instead of a blog written by a Sun Times writer, why do I get blocked instead of the others making the article unreliable? Is there any reasonable administrator I can talk to?}}LAUGH90 (talk) 04:37, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concerned admins, just note that the user has returned to this page after his attempt at vehemently promoting a sock, failed. Check User:ARMOR89 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for more details. And I personally believe its a lost case to expect any form of chivalrous editing from this one, the talk page is full and littered with warnings and probing to discuss changes, which he/she has completely failed to do so. I don't think any reasonable request will be acceptable in this case, and this one is better indefd. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:23, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I need to contact another adminstrator on getting un-blocked, but how do I do so.LAUGH90 (talk) 14:59, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Every time you add {{unblock}} to your talk page, it's reviewed by new admins. I'm not allowed to decline it, because I'm the admin that made the original block. That said, your spree last night has added a new condition: I won't unblock you until you agree to not edit anonymously or with alternate accounts. Using both ARMOR89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 76.117.166.71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) as socks while you were blocked was unacceptable.—Kww(talk) 15:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I think I see the problem. Don't use {{tlx|unblock....}} use {{unblock|...}}. "tlx" keeps the template from expanding.—Kww(talk) 15:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LAUGH90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Okay then, I promise not to edit under anything but the name LAUGH90 and use reputable sources.

Decline reason:

Thanks! Of course, that's just what the rules require of all of us. You seem to indicate by omission that you aren't willing to meet the offered unblock terms, which indicates that you've decided not to be unblocked, so I'm not sure why you used the unblock template. Please, only use the unblock template to request an unblock. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:17, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Just noting that he has not agreed to the original unblock provision, and his behaviour as a sock doesn't show any likelihood that he will.—Kww(talk) 16:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I did nothing wrong. I even have fellow users on wiki that agree with me. I will admit the socking is wrong, but the original reason of why I was blocked in unneccessary. I put reputable sources with my claim (which I was banned for) while an ureliable source is being used.LAUGH90 (talk) 16:21, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Your failure to recognize what you did wrong is why you remain blocked. You were edit-warring, and refused to stop. Hell, I think you are probably right about the sales figure, but that hasn't got anything to do with why you were blocked. You were blocked for edit-warring and for logging out to continue your edit war anonymously.—Kww(talk) 16:23, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Here's the way it works on Wikipedia: First, you make an edit. If other users disagree with your desired edit, then you discuss the disagreement, and come to a consensus together. After you've developed an agreement, then you make the edit that you all agreed on together. You want to skip the 'discussion' and 'reach a consensus' steps, which is disruptive. I have no idea how many copies of that particular album Madonna has sold, and I can see that the discussion is still happening on the talk page, though a consensus seems to be forming now that other editors are free to focus on the question without having to deal with the distraction of your edits. None of that has any relation to your block, which is for refusing to discuss your desired changes or wait for consensus, but trying to simply force your own desired version into the encyclopedia. With the bad behavior, it's possible you won't find an admin to unblock you no matter what you say. But you definitely won't be unblocked until you show that you understand, and are willing to follow, Wikipedia's process of discussing and reaching consensus before making changes in cases of disagreement. If you can't work together with others at all, then you should be writing on your own web site, not on a web site that depends on working together. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Okay, now I understand.LAUGH90 (talk) 17:14, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

LAUGH90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Having understand why I was blocked by FisherQueen, I promise that I will go to the discussion part first and wait till we all reach a consensus instead of the edits. I will also promise not to use sock accounts anymore, log on only to LAUGH90, and to use reputable sources with edits.

Accept reason:

You've been unblocked. Currently, there is no consensus about the figure you have been trying to change. I strongly advise that you not take it upon yourself to change it. If you change it and I decide there is any reasonable doubt about where consensus lies, you will find yourself blocked again. I can see from your talk page that you have a long history of edits that others consider to be vandalism. Be advised that you are being watched carefully, and any admin that blocks you in the future is quite likely to make it a long block.

—Kww(talk) 22:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm considering removing the block, but I haven't decided. Any other admin that reads this and decides that LAUGH90 is sincere can feel free to lift it: I won't raise any objection.—Kww(talk) 20:23, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm suggesting you let the block go, provided Laugh90 does not make these changes him/herself. I'm going to keep discussing the sources with Legolas and take this particular issue to

WP:NPOVN if necessary. Laugh90, you should know that repeat violations of edit warring will lead to successively longer blocks. Please return to the article not only to be right but to follow whatever process is necessary to civilly resolve the dispute. Ocaasi (talk) 21:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article

welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please don't make change to statistics quoted in articles without explaining why or providing sources -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:51UZpCx6Z7L. SL500 AA280 .jpg

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palmer in dressing room.png

Please explain how you had to opportunity to obtain this picture (in as much detail as you can without revealing your personal identity). If I don't find it convincing, I'll delete the image and ask you to submit the image through the OTRS process.—Kww(talk) 21:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've never provided a convincing explanation, so the image has been deleted.—Kww(talk) 13:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Palmer in dressing room.png

Thanks for uploading

this list, click on this link

, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palmer True Jackson photoshoot.jpg

Photo was labeled "All Rights Reserved" at source. If you have a letter giving you permission, contact OTRS to license the image.—Kww(talk) 23:08, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Big Time Rush - Halfway There coverart.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:03, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning about NPOV violations on "Burlesque" page

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Furthermore, you have history of being disruptive and being blocked for violating consensus. You've been warned.75.174.135.137 (talk) 21:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cymphonique Miller

Please do not add or change content without

reliable source that contradicts this please take it to the article talk page for discussion prior to changing the current date --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 03:07, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Hilary Duff albums

Santa Claus Lane is Duff's debut album. Holiday albums ARE studio albums. Metamorphosis is her second, the Hilary Duff album is her third and Dignity is her fourth. QuasyBoy 20:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link in article 'Love & Life (Mary J. Blige album)'

Hi. The article '

dead link

that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://fanofmusic.free.fr/BestSellers.php?Act=MaryJBlige

• You added this in March 2009.
• The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots|deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 18:55, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article

welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kevinbrogers (talk) 22:39, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:"Rags" poster.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  here
  .
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please
  ask an admin to turn it off here
  .

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:50, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm

talk) 18:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Touch (Amerie album). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article
  dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's
  Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  .

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

talk) 18:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Figures that don't match sources

You've been editing for six years, and you certainly know better than this. If you have a new figure, supply a new source. If you can't be bothered to change the source, don't change the figure.—Kww(talk) 05:01, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know better than this kind of crap as well.—Kww(talk) 15:43, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nickipedia

Nickipedia is no different than Wikipedia - anyone can edit it and it's unreviewed. As such it's not a reliable source and can't be cited to support anything here. Thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 13:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring of junk sources again. You've been blocked multiple times for edit-warring in figures from unreliable sources, and now, once again, I find you edit warring in a figure that is from one blog reposting pirated material from another blog. If this user provides any credible reason to show that he understands our policies on reliable sources and edit-warring, any admin can unblock him.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text , but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 20:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LAUGH90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The reason is because I was just trying to give accurate information and from what I was told, the source I gave was informative and accurate. If it isn't, I now understand and won't do it again.

Decline reason:

I share Kww's concerns below, and your request and comment below doesn't really convince me in any way. Do you know how to separate a reliable from an unreliable source? You've been here long enough, and considering that you've been blocked in the past for a similar violation of policy you really should know by now. Bjelleklang - talk 15:12, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1. After you inserted it, it was reverted, and you simply reinserted it without discussion. Why did you ignore another editor telling you the source was unreliable?
2. Under what circumstances would one blog quoting another blog be considered reliable per the standards at
   WP:RS? What were you "told" that made you believe it was?—Kww(talk) 00:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
   ]

• Because from what I researched was that is was informative and wasn't a blogspot. Plus many of sources backed the claim. I don't understand.LAUGH90 (talk) 00:55, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That actually frightens me a little. You've been editing for nearly seven years. You've been blocked for using bad sources before, and you've been blocked for edit warring before. Can you look at your source and explain to me how it compares against the criteria listed at

WP:BRD says about restoring material after another editor has reverted you?—Kww(talk) 01:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

The question still stands, even though your unblock request has been declined by another admin. I'm still watching, and am willing to discuss unblocking you. I just need to be able to believe that it won't lead to the same problems we've had before.—Kww(talk) 18:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I now know my faults and now agree to follow the rules. It was just unclear to me with the Kelly Rowland article issue. I just thought I used a reputable source.LAUGH90 (talk) 01:02, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• I have learned my lesson, and I'm hoping i'm unblocked to edit again. Please just give me a chance.LAUGH90 (talk) 02:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rags film poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

The Cheetah Girls (video game)

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The Cheetah Girls (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cheetah Girls (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Coin945 (talk) 08:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]