This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I guess we're both busy with a No Way Out.... PPV. ;) So, your going to work on the feuds and I'm going to work on the Event, for Survivor Series, right? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)01:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We are going to start it this Thursday, when a few of us are on vacation from school. First, I need Truco and Zenlax to vote. If I don't have their votes by Sunday, I'm going to have to more on to the next round. (The final round).
I know. I gotta get off for the night. I have to be somewhere tomorrow morning, but from 1:30 p.m. until late night, I'll be on. I need to work on starting up the adoption with the user who left and adoption request on my talk page. (My first adoption).
D.M.N. doesn't want to work on the project anymore. Can you do me a huge favor and ask bulletproof and NimiTize to vote on the Kliq's talk page. (as well as Blue).
Ok. We have to most on though, we'll already have a PPV though when he gets back. (Since we start Thursday). Btw, we have seven contributors, we can have two on the background, two on the event, two on the aftermath, and one (or two if D.M.N. changes his mind) on fixing errors, adding sources, and making changes.
We can worry about that though when we pick the PPV. I'd like the event though. (half). If we have seven people expanding this, it will no doubt be a future FA.
Thanks. I saw SummerSlam's talk page, and I'm not sure if thats a review, or just an editor expressing concerns. I might review another article today though, to shrink the list. Also, I have never made one edit (I believe) to SummerSlam 94. I believe that at least I should be able to review it, since I had nothing to do with it's nomination. Idk.
Hey, I'm confused. I have new links added to the top of articles. Like on talk pages, it sayd (warn, arv, csd, last, rpp, xfd, and unlink). What are these?
Holy shit, stupid me. This whole time I was under the impression that you can be blocked on your third edit. Now I get it. You can have three edits every 24 hours, then on the fourth you can be blocked right? Wow, I sound like a newbie. lol.
Why do you and others keep removing my comments and accusing me of vandalism without even paying attention TO WHAT IM ACTUALLY SAYING?
The page in question is about a 100% completely ficticious artist, not one piece of information in it have the slightest element of truth - yet why I attempt to bring it to the attention of those will full wikipedia accounts, you accuse ME of vandalism?
Yeah, guess not. So, he's used Cowboycaleb1 + 2, so I guess I need to wait until Cowboycaleb3 appears on my radar. If the link does turn blue over night, just use your mop to get rid of the bug. D.M.N. (talk) 20:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
iMatthew, please assume good faith before implying to other users that I need to be watched. You don't even know me. I resent your POV comment about me. It is uncalled for. You could of at least assumed good faith which you clearly did not.
I didn't vandalize anything. So don't send me your little smart alec messages about using the sandbox. If i cared enough i'd just write that thing you wasted your time deleting all over again and this time add a couple links to Youtube that has openings of the show to prove i was right. I probably won't do that though, since i don't care about what info is and isn't put on the pages nearly as much as some peoplr. Maybe i shouldn't call your remarks smart alec even though it's true, but it just annoyed me.--Axeman 10 (talk) 01:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, i didn't follow the policy as i should of. You didn't "annoy" me exactly, it just "annoys" me how people want to throw their weight around about content they're not familiar with. Youtube would be reliable in this case because there's like 3 or 4 intros to "The Main Event" that has SNME's generic intro music, and they're not all from the same user. So you can say "Oh, well they could of edited the music for a reason i can't think up right now", but all different users doing the same thing? Regardless, if i cared enough, i could search enough to find a reliable source. But a few extra words doesn't mean anything to me right now. One day in the future i may do that, but not now. I'm interested in the copyright infringement with Youtube and WWE you mentioned though, so if you would, tell me a little more about it. --Axeman 10 (talk) 01:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't thinking when i brought up Youtube, but that's where i found it out about the intro music. Have you watched an episode by disc or something, to make you believe that i was wrong about the intro? Also, if later on idecide to do this and post links to reliable and legal sources, there won't be any problems, right? --Axeman 10 (talk) 01:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm seeing if I can get some more information on this. It isn't like him to be this obvious anymore. As always, be vigilant. Cheers, SexySeaBass22:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad to hear that. Bulletproof and I have had contact with him for months, so we have a bit more information than anyone else assuming we successfully sifted through what was a lie and what wasn't, and bulletproof may have even met him in person. However, that doesn't matter at this point. The information is only relevant to the status of his ban, which is unanimously supported at this point. You know what to look for, and what to expect from him in regards to sockpuppetry. I'm not on much anymore, but when I am I'll be keeping watch as well. Peace, SexySeaBass22:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you tell me how i would go about requesting a partial block on PCCA. The page is getting bombed to death by vandals. Thanks for the help. Saksjn (talk) 19:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you are still thinking of a username, how about BreakDownTheWalls or BDTW.
Oh, it reminds me of when I was Zero and I didn't want to change to Blue. I understand how you feel. ;) Hey, IDK if your in the mood or not, but can you update Judgment Day 2005? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)02:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SummerSlam (2000) has been listed for Peer review. Please review this article and make suggestions for how it can be improved in preparation for a Good article nomination. It's peer reviews can be found here.
Good article
status.
Good article candidates
.
iMatthew, and Nikki311 have answered questions relating to the project here
NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members.
Since the last newsletter, the number of stub articles has continued to drop, while the total number of wrestling articles continues to grow. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve. Please check it out and see what you can help with (even if you can only add a few details or a couple of references).
Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
I AM REALLY REALLY SORRY TO BOTHER YOU IN THIS WAY, but...How does it look? And can this image and/or this one and or/ this one be uploaded? Also why can't these be copied from their location?
OMG, I was too. He kept on insisting that I change "Raw" to "RAW" and I was not going to make the change. But, whatever. Did you write One Night Stand? Oh, I sent you an e-mail. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)22:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I know. Isn't he part of PW, though? Oh, that's cool. Hey, since Jeff Money was blocked, we can take SummerSlam '06 and see if we can get it to GA. Opinion? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)22:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, cause he wrote Survivor Series '06 and fixes everything at the PPV section. SummerSlam, we can wait on that, as you said it needs to be re-written, so we can work on Survivor Series '04, before Diamonds takes it. How does that sound? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)23:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that's cool. Well, NWO just failed FA.... again. If your confident the article is written well, go and nominate it for FA. But, you gotta let the PW people know, before they come and give you crap. ;) P.S. Do you like my page layout? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)01:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:PW talkpage. Before moving onto working on any new PPV articles, I suggest you read the bottom topic. Just letting ya know. D.M.N. (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
RVD
Hey there. I don't know how that edit ended up with my name on it. It was on there earlier this morning, I reverted it because it was in the wrong section and not very notable, and I went back to verify it, and it was gone. I have no idea why it says I did it. Hazardous Matt20:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh. Nevermind. I read it a little too quick and saw that someone undid a revision I had done, and for some reason thought it miscredited me as the person adding the info. Disregard my above...rantyness. Hazardous Matt20:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re: SummerSlam FA
I don't see why not, your article looks a hell of alot better than NWO. Your's has a better chance of passin then NWO had. Also does
Don't let tempers flair, just try to reason with the reviewer. Also, I think it me be helpful to bring another project member to see if the reviewer is bringing up problems for no apparent reason. As for the response you left, I recommend going through the same procedure you did with SummerSlam. ZenlaxTCS19:37, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notifying the project members of your task with SummerSlam. If you receive no replies, withing a certain time, I guess you have a choice of nominating the article with or without responses from the project. ZenlaxTCS19:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good, I was starting to think I was making no sense whatsoever. Also, I've added a peer review to Backlash and left a message at the project. Hope I did a good job on placing a peer review. ZenlaxTCS19:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your welcome, and I asked Zenlax he said its ready. I also announced it for GA yesterday, so I will nominate it next thursday or friday.
stop following me and redoing every edit i do i was right on mcmahon whats next rvd page look we all have our right some opne could be doing somthing based on world champions and get it wrong as mcmahons only a 1 time wolrd champion check list of pwi world champions and thats finaly i'm putting it right stop stop putting it wrong āPreceding unsigned comment added by Devil Thunderbolt (talk ā¢ contribs) 20:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
hop u don't mind then ive put rvd as a two time world champion see if it gets deleted if it dose mcmahon stays how i put it however if this stays on rvds page then we will keep it on mcmahons i think that this is a fair way to settle this disagreement don't you even though on other wrestling articals is dont count the ecw title or official it isent a world title we should put he is an unofissial champion āPreceding unsigned comment added by Devil Thunderbolt (talk ā¢ contribs) 20:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
right this is gett ridicklus stop editing everything i edit your not the owner of wikipedia and i feel that u are arrasing me every edit i make guess whos undone it ..... you look i'm gonna report this if it continues hopeful we can work this out i'm studing wrestling and most of the info i put up is usful to me and my mates who are also studing wrestling KCDavis (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
it like this man i want to wrestle so i'm studing and have found a lot of info on wikipedia but info that i have have found helpful ive added for others but you delete them and so u patrol wrestling articls then why when i put rvd was a two time world champ it was deleted twice see pwi is not everthing to due with wrestling but they have the power to make championships have world title staus and u may not like that but its the truths there things i dont like on some pages but its important to others thats why i dont delete it so just leave info alone on pages that i edit cuz i'm feeling herassed and if i kept reverting edits u did u wont like it but i wont cuz this is not just for me and who cares about rvd beeing the logest hardcore champion under the 24/7 rule this lasted 90 days thats only 7 less then the logest reging one so its important KCDavis (talk) 21:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)7[reply]
Right this is stupied rvds page dose not say 2 time world champion vinces dose why i have reported u as i fell very harresed and can not edit any articl without U! beeing the one reverting it u are targiting me so please stop it i am right in saying mcmahon has holded two title with world in there name however only one is official the other is not get not nowhere is this official if it was i would leave since ive started edit u have made it very hard this is not a treat of angry comment this is say LEAVE ME ALONE right
i fixed vince it covers both our points so its fair so insted of us haveing what only one want ive put both of our topics there and yea i felt that last one a treat please dont anymore and 1 quick questio how come when i put rvd was a two time world champion it was quickly removed thanks for your time KCDavis (talk) 21:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Back
I've been gone for a few days, and probably will not be back full time until sometime next week. Btw, I see you've taken Armageddon. Do you mind if I write the event with/for you? I was actually planning on working on it sometime in the near future. Also, I'm letting you know that after Hardy/Kendrick/Lesnar/Rated-RKO go through GAN, I will finish RR 04. While they are are nominations, I'll finish the event for SS 01, and maybe Armageddon. After these are done, I'm probably going to take a break of PPV's and work on getting a few other articles to GA.
Ok, I'll write the first half. You have to talk to Truco about that, or get somebody to switch with you. Otherwise, your leaving Truco with the entire Background by himself.
Oh, I thought you were still talking about Survivor Series. But yeah, I was referring to '06, cause you and I planned on working on it. Cool, then. Just, let me know when you guys have the background and event and I'll write the aftermath. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)00:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OMG, don't say that. I don't think I can bare the idea of it failing again. Not to sound like a dick or whatever, but I have confidence that it will pass. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)01:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. But, I'm not sure on Shane McMahon's article, though. Its been a long time since I've added something. Hey, do you think you can help out Truco with an image? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)03:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. I sorta want to re-write it, since your working on New Years Revolution '06. Okay, the part about Undertaker having the advantage over Mark Henry in that one match, is that really necessary about him "overpowering" him? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)17:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's the only thing I got from the background part. Is it cool with you if I fix the ref. order for NWO? I don't think I'd be much of help for the EC feud, since I wasn't watching Raw at the time. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)17:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, if you remove that info. about Undertaker's "powering". Didn't you have that for SummerSlam, when Cena took the upper hand over Carlito? But, on the Randy Orton and Rey feud, is it important about how Mark Henry and Kurt Angle abandoned the match and left Orton and Rey on their own? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)17:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know, but I don't feel like working on that. I want to work on something that I want to work on. Not to show off or whatever, but if Vengeance '05 passes GA, it'll be the first GA that two people have worked on. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)19:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I believe you didn't cheat, but before you get your award, please e-mail me and tell me where you found the link. If you didn't find the link, you cheated. :P
I decided to check out the recent changes on there, and some user has uploaded tons of images in violation of copyright laws, and inserted them into articles. You're probably going to have to bot rollback him, and you have a lot of work ahead of you in clearing out those images. Cheers, SexySeaBass03:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, from the ones I looked at they're all WWE images, and as such it is breaking the law to not delete them. The rules about fair use materials that apply here also apply there. However, do try to make sure the user doesn't quit over it, as difficult as that will be. Cheers, SexySeaBass14:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SmackDown's move to MyNetworkTV
Listen, I understand that you have put a hidden message in the code that says "don't add", but I feel that citing MyNetworkTV as the new network within that area of the page is valid. After all, WWE has formally announced that SmackDown! will be on that network. The deal is signed. It's official. Don't you think it would be beneficial to show where the program is going? When I go to a Wiki page about a television show I'm interested in, that area is usually the first place I look. I was under the assumption that Wikipedia was for information, and citing MyNetworkTV is doing just that: informing a WWE fan that the show will be there in the fall. Just a thought... (P.S. I wasn't experimenting. I made a mistake.) āPreceding unsigned comment added by Bat86 (talk ā¢ contribs) 09:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Listen, I'll be straight with you. I'm not trying to be hostile or start a fight. I'm just saying that the project doesn't own the article. If an editor makes a LEGITIMATE change to an article (and the move to MyNetworkTV is legitimate), it should stay. It is not right or fair for the project to dictate whether or not a proven fact is allowed in an article. If I try to submit something false, by all means, nix it. But I was just trying to submit a proven fact (I believe the move is even cited at the bottom of the article). āPreceding unsigned comment added by Bat86 (talk ā¢ contribs) 10:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where can I find that talk page? Either way, I will revert it. I'm not trying to be rebellious, but Wikipedia is the place where "anyone can edit". I'm not vandalizing. I'm not trying to make a point within the article. I'm just wanting a true fact in the article. I appreciate your patience, and I hope that you understand why it should be there. Bat86 (talk) 10:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I have discussed it. I have stated my argument, and it is there clear as day. What else do I have to do to make that submission stick? Honestly, I don't know if I want to edit on Wikipedia anymore because it seems that censorship is running rampant on the pro wrestling articles (no offense). Bat86 (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, there has only been one objection to my submission...from a member of your project...an administrator. I'm sorry, please don't take offense to this, but it seems to me that if something is put in the article that you don't want there, you nix it, and that is especially absurd in this situation considering the submission is FACTUAL. But, if I have to wait for the consensus, so be it. But, I am expecting that the consensus is going to decide against the submission because the "almighty project" doesn't want it there, for God knows why. I don't see how it hurts the information. I only see improvement. Bat86 (talk) 10:36, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate that you see that I'm not trying to stir things up. I'm a daily visitor of Wikipedia (seriously). I come here all the time, and I have always wanted to work with the various editors to continue this thing. I would never try to vandalize or screw up someone else's work. I just want to share what little (lol) knowledge I have. I will wait for another opinion before I revert it again. I just hope that I can work with you guys, as I am a lifelong wrestling fan. If you have any other input on what I can do or need my help in any way (although my Wiki-knowledge is limited), please don't hesitate to ask. I am viewing the Hall of Fame ceremony and WrestleMania XXIV this weekend. If you need any help with those articles as well, please include me. Thanks again, and I'm sorry if I have offended you or anyone else. Bat86 (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can't see why not. However, I do feel you have gone a little bit of "references overkill" in most of the background section. IMO, you really only need one reference for a single point, in my view you don't need two references for every single point, unless it is something the reader is more than likely to challenge. D.M.N. (talk) 18:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Something else about SummerSlam: You need to say in the Aftermath how the PPV was recieved, whether people thought it was good or totally crap. You'll also need to mention the buyrate, and how it relates to previous years. For D2D, that was quite easy for me, as the PPV, was well shit. :D
You also DEFINITELY need to say in the background that Jackass were going to be involved in angles, but were later dropped[3] (without things like that, IMO it won't unfortunately become an FA)
Sources
SLAM! Sports - Gives the event a rating of 6.5/10 (Highest match rating 7.5/10 for WWE title match, ECW title match & Rey/Chavo; Lowest match rating 1/10 for World title)
That's the only one I oculd find, but there are probably more lurking about. Also, you need to note that ten superstars were suspended just days after the event (which affected future storylines).[4] Quote from article: "On September 7 edition of SmackDown!, Mysterio defeated Chavo Guerrero in an "I Quit" match." - you need to note this was to get Chavo off TV due to the suspension.
Many were taken off TV for the month, and that needs to be noted in the article. I'm only telling you now, because I don't really want to see in the FAC having someone see "I thought Jackass was meant to be involved", "weren't several people suspended days after" etc, which could send the FAC down the pan. D.M.N. (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, that source doesn't look reliable IMO. You could use this though. You might want to say, that a lot of people were against the angle. D.M.N. (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This seems OK for another reviewer. It's not exactly reliable, but it represents an opinion, which is needed when going for a review. D.M.N. (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. :( It worked absolutely fine for me. I would say try going on it again, but don't know whether you want to risk it. :( D.M.N. (talk) 16:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very nice. I made one little change, and that was "storyline" instead of "storylines". I think they were only intended to be in one storyline, therefore the "s" is not needed. I've reworded some things as well as removing a ref that I didn't think was needed. Good work, D.M.N. (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK. However, first off there are other (minor) things which need sorting. BTW, the Khali/Batista bit is very good too. IMO, there is way to much wikilinking, discounting the lead and the results section, things are only meant to be linked on first notice. I did this in December to Dismember (2006) and several other articles I've worked this, and it is recommended in the MOS. If you wish, I will go through the article, and remove duplicate wikilinks. Also, after a first mention of a person in a section e.g. John Cena, they should only be mentioned by their last name again in that section e.g. Cena. D.M.N. (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think so. It depends on what the first sentence is, I think. Anyway, can I go ahead, and remove duplicate Wikilinks? D.M.N. (talk) 19:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Plans...
What are you planning on getting done tonight? Can you review an article at GAN?
Well, I have your "page" on my watchlist, but not your talk page, but I've added it. Anyways, why is he doing that, though? Also, when do you want to work on Survivor Series? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)23:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He said he as been recieving alot of criticism lately, and that it is the right thing for him to do. I told Matt that I would be working on it tonight. āCheers, LAX23:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then why did you place the banner on your page and tell me you were leaving? Blue, I have replied. āLAX00:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was in a horrible mood and even taking it out on my family. I went way out of line, and LAX I really apologize. It had nothing to do with you, I'm very, very sorry!
I understand. We all have stress, and when stress from outside Wikipedia and wikistress combine, it's not a good thing. āLAX00:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I like it so I can follow my discussions with other users. BTW, if you haven't done so already, please add my talk page to your watchlist. āCheers, LAX23:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Truco: Yeah, but I don't think it is sent automatically. Also, who is going to retire after WrestleMania (referring to your edit summary on WrestleMania XXIV)?
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Hall of Fame was awesome and sad. THE ROCK OWNED!!! IT DOSENT MATTER WHAT YOUR NAME IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL, Chris Jericho gets up when Rock makes fun of him LOL. Ric Flair vs Shawn Michaels 2morro....Ughh.. Michaels I want you to win, but then again its a big match for Flair. Anyway, nite bro.
I do. Really. Hey, are you Latino? I'm Greek! Um, sorry. mY life got stressful once again. I see i'm not your friend no more. Do you hate me now? How sad. Oh well. No one likes me no more! Cool. Now I can fly under the radar! Tech43 (talk) 04:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To me it reads well, but lets see what occurs during its FAC, good luck.--
That finisher scares me. I know, too bad the Patriots didn't have it that way. :( Well, can't wait 'til tomorrow. All the vandalism / edits that will need to be reverted. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)03:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I, unfortunately, am not as experienced as I should be when it comes to protecting pages. So, I would ask another admin, probably Nikki311. āLAX19:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SummerSlam 2007 - Cena/Orton
I've done some of the linking issues. Anyway: "At The Great American Bash, John Cena defeated Bobby Lashley to retain the WWE Championship.[22][23] The next night on RAW, Executive Assistant Jonathan Coachman announced Randy Orton as the new number one contender to the WWE Championship.[24][25]" - Didn't Orton RKO Cena the night after the Bash, and the Coach came out and announced the #1 Contender? I think that needs to be rectified in the article. D.M.N. (talk) 20:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey man. I did it to warn people the stupidity level of the event. I am a wrestling fan, I love Wrestling, but this was a bad event. āPreceding unsigned comment added by 70.68.190.170 (talk) 22:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
^^^Undertaker owned tonight. Anyway. On the Triple H article, in the history it says that you said, we agreed on to cap. brands? When was that? BTW, Triple H has been nominated for FA status;
Can I move the entire WM XXIV article into a sandbox, and leave only the results there. It's getting to much vandalism, and I'm doing to work on it soon.
Maybe I said it wrong. I meant can I move the info to my sandbox temporarily while I work on it and expand it. I'm not asking to leave it there or something, just to transfer into to my sandbox.
It reads well. One part though stands to mind. In the sentence with "Shane McMahon, who planned the angle after their last appearance on the June 4 edition of RAW, signed cast members Bam Margera, Chris Pontius, Johnny Knoxville, Preston Lacey, Ryan Dunn, Steve-O, and Wee-Man to be involved". Maybe re-wording it like "Shane McMahon, who planned (organized) the angle, after the cast made an appearance on the June 4 edition of RAW....." Overall, I understand it, but it would be best to get second opinions. ZenlaxTCS19:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it does seem like a slap in the face, but I take criticism to correct my mistakes. :) As for the e-mail, yes I have received it and I have replied. Have you received that e-mail as well? ZenlaxTCS19:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not to get into a full discussion, but if the decision was made, I have no choice but to abide by it. The other reason being is that my iPhone will not let me open another browser, as I am currently working on some tasks. ZenlaxTCS19:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, if I seemed a bit tedious, but I think the subject should be discussed with the other members to see what they think. If they come to an agreement, I think it would be best to talk about the subject once more. As for Backlash, are you open to help improve the article? ZenlaxTCS20:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I really don't particularly want to take sides here but:
Remember, the purpose of links is to direct the reader to a new spot at the point(s) where the reader is most likely to take a temporary detour due to needing more information. -
It's the same thing, but you need a Y! email to use Yahoo Messenger, there are 2 versions of Y! messenger, the online and download one, just use the online one, and when you are done tell me your Y! name so I can find you.--
I was wondering if there is any way i can get it off of my main page. There is no history of anybody adding it to my page. Could you help me, cause i have no idea what to do
You know what, I actually never said that I see it you way, because I do not. I do not understand why this is happening...why all of you who I thought were my friends just turned on me, so thanks guys. I really need to get out of this place, and no, it's not just for five minutes.
I can't respond at the moment, as I am currently getting to enter into a meeting. I will, however, respond a little later. Is that fine by you? ZenlaxTCS20:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for understanding, but work is work. If you would have contacted me a little earlier I would have responded, but duty calls first. ZenlaxTCS20:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ignore Matt's comments above!, disrespectful..but yea I will be back every here and then, but it's too much..Im sorry, please take care of the queries I left at WT:PW.--
Hey Truco said before he retired to get to know you well...I just wanted to say hi do you think the wp:pw club will ever b the same? CrymeTyme-9400:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I did a pre-GA review of this article today. I did some copyediting, but I didn't see anything that I felt needed to be brought up on the talk page. The article is easy to understand, and I don't forsee any real problems during a GA review. Good job with this article. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I also got a pre-GA review and copyediting of Judgment Day (2007) done today. I left a short list on the article's talk page of things that I think should be clarified. You're doing a great job with these articles. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I assumed that you had written them because you added them to my to-do list. Anyhow, I did a bunch of copyediting for stuff like verb tense, point of view ("brutally" and similar words were used fairly regularly throughout both), and ease of reading. Both articles are fairly short and don't go into a lot of detail, but they cover all of the important aspects. I'm pretty sure that I go into too much detail in the pay-per-view articles I write, so I have a hard time saying that other articles are too short. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
