User talk:Otolemur crassicaudatus

This user may have left Wikipedia. Otolemur crassicaudatus has not edited Wikipedia since 25 December 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

/Archive 1 (6 Oct. '07 - 6 March '08) /Archive 2 (7 March '08 - 10 May '08) /Archive 3 (11 May '08 - 7 August '08)

They seem to be some sort of marketing firm ([1]). ... discospinster _talk 02:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but I still had to Google it! :) ... discospinster _talk 03:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That might work, since I can't find anything else. To be safe though, [2] here's another news source that discusses it. Wizardman 19:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Captions aren't mandatory, as such, but they're generally a good idea so that the reader understands what the table is for. Bearcat (talk) 07:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I generally like them better with a title caption whenever possible, but it's ultimately up to editor discretion — there's no requirement either way. As long as the purpose and meaning of the table is explained somehow, just do whatever makes more sense to you — there's no right or wrong. Bearcat (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, tables are not discussed by the Manual of Style, and the only style guideline merely discusses when tables should and shouldn't be used. Unless I've overlooked something, it's my opinion that there's not any sort of mandatory rule of style to be followed with regard to tables. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 07:06, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See bot hit on my talk page. Why is that image orphaned? It directly pertains to the article it was in and it illustraties the subject of the article. Critical commentary is not required. Resspond on my talk page. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was a vandal ... reverted back to an earlier version. I'm going to look further to see if semi-protection's in order.

]

African economy

Hi. I've started a full set of templates for each of the African economies at

]

Ahh lost my longer message to you in a cut and paste mess up. Not sure about Western Sahara as it is connected to Morocco but I think a series on banking or the stock market in each of the African countries is possible - Banking in Uganda etc. If we could develop each one along the lines of Template:Economy of Ghana I think it will start to take shape. It is a lot of work for sure, but it is an area that need covering and an important one at that but will be done gradually and the templates are the first step to connect them together.

]

Re: username

Thanks for bringing it to me, I indef'd and left the username tag. You're right, we don't allow "bot" in the username as it could cause confusion. And if it were a new bot account they would've tagged it as such instantly. Also, quick question, why'd you bring it to me? Thanks again.

]

I was a bit confused if it will be right to bring this to

WP:UAA, so I asked you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

It probably would've been better as those admins over there would be more experienced with dealing with usernames. But it was fine to bring it to me this time :-) Good job. (P.S. I meant, how did you find me?)

Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 11:17, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I noticed you while recent change patrolling. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why that IP keep removing that information. That section is very well sourced. If he keep doing i will ask the admins to do something regarding it. Yea you may be right. It is maybe a socks. We can ask admins to look into it?. Should we ask?--SkyWalker (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's the source, so it's in the reference section. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National Cleavage Day, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--Mifter (talk) 19:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good point. I haven't kept abreast of this news story - if you know better than I do then feel free to revert.

On a slight diversion... it's good to talk to the person who is responsible for Wikipedia recognition of "National Cleavage Day"! *grins* Bobo. 09:53, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just getting to grips with the North Berwick Branch of the North British Railway this morning - initial stup articles being created at present. Further information to follow. Thanks for the prompt. --Stewart ^(talk) 09:55, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. I'm working on many other things already. Markussep ^Talk 12:15, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am sorry to say that I am not familiar with the subject of V-Day or National Vagina Day but you could always add NVD to the V-Day article, saying "on February 14, V-Day organizes an event in order to inform society of violence against women..." or something like that. Other than that, thats all I can really be of help with. Hope that works out for your question. OOODDD (talk) 06:35, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you wrote: "Hi, can you please translate what is written here below the three separate images". The lower part of the image uploaded by you shows an engraving of famous German medieval painter Albrecht Dürer, titled "Ritter, Tod und Teufel" (to be translated as "The Knight, Death, and the Devil").

• Gefährlich leben = living dangerously
• translation of the part between: Dürer's famous engraving "The Knight, Death, and the Devil" praises the heroic human, who in constant contact with death strongly clings to live, and leads the demon in his own chest into the fight against a world full of devils."
• Bereitsein ist alles = to be ready (for something) is everything

The Nazis created a variation of this Dürer engraving title, to be used in their non-smoking campaign: "The Knight against Death and Devil". "Tabak und Krebs" = "Tobacco and cancer". The lobster (crab) on the upper image fits because the German word "Krebs" can mean "cancer" or "crab". "Propaganda Musika" = "propaganda with music" (Musika is a poetic variation of the word Musik - music). "So appetitlich frisch" (written with long s where appropriate) means "so appetizingly fresh".--Ratzer (talk) 09:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The articles do seem different. There should be a dab page titled V-Day (disambiguation) to sort this out. Does that help? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like you said, there's no reference to National Vagina Day on V-Day so it's probably a different event. Either that or for some reason it wasn't written in the article. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just as unsure as you are. Well, why not ask

WP:HOLIDAY? They might express a few thoughts. Sorry if I couldn't be of more help. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi OC - for future reference, stub templates and categories should be taken to

]

FPC

Hello. Generally I like this image, and think it meets the criteria needed for nomination. You know, always users who will oppose the promotion to the FP will appear, but you can nominate it surely. Some objections might target the resolution of this image, generally FPs tend to be larger. - Darwinek (talk) 13:08, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There must have been a poultry factory there at least. I think the town was set up as just a factory with barracks for the workers, but apparently it's a separate municipality. I don't think the factory still works, on Google Maps it looks like most of it has been demolished. But the houses are still there. The

]

DYK

On 23 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crime in Israel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

Thank you for your contributions! -

]

Image

I wish I knew the answer, but I don't know a whole lot about copyright. Try asking Zscout370 or maybe Carnildo, they might be able to help you out. Khoikhoi 20:26, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per the FA critera:

Images. It has

be labeled accordingly

.

So, yeah, in general there should be at lease some images, but the number and type will depend on the article. -- Vary | Talk 15:29, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't really know. It definitely depends on the circumstances, but it might be an idea to bring it up at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates; I'm sure someone there will either be able to tell you if a given topic is one that might not need images, or give you some suggestions on what to add or what you should look for in an image. FA discussions don't give much weight to concerns that aren't 'actionable', so if there genuinely are no image possibilities for an otherwise FA-worthy article, I would imagine - not being an FA reviewer myself - that the article would probably pass. But you'll probably get a better answer at the FAC talk page. -- Vary | Talk 15:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am flattered that you contacted me over this, but I doubt I can be of much help, since my knowlege of image protocols is non-existent - I am frequently in trouble over my image choices, constantly having to delete, etc. For what it's worth, in my opinion your first image is central to the article and should be retained if at all possible. The second is less essential and the article wouldn't suffer much fron its loss. I see from the talkpage that you have heavyweights such as Awadewit and Elcobbola in on the discussion, and I would be much guided by them. Hope this helps (though I doubt it does - sorry). Brianboulton (talk) 16:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I imagine that the copyright would be similar to this one here. --Polylerus (talk) 01:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm crap at doing tables-- you should ask someone else! Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am not expert regarding tables, unfortunately. However, I found http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Table_demo which should help answer your question WhisperToMe (talk) 03:56, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The machine-translated page definitely isn't reliable, since it's virtually impossible to understand :-) Foreign language pages can be suitable as reliable sources, but sorry to say I can't help you, as I don't understand (1) the German original, or (2) the machine-translated English. You'll have to ask someone who knows German. Nyttend (talk) 04:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is updated by

]

re: Tool

Hi, I have

]

an editor felt that the article didn't sufficiently show that she passed the music/band guideline. I was going to remove it a bit later today. A larger issue that I've come across in preparing that article is the woeful state of many articles on Americana (music). If you have some time, please work on a few! --Rocksanddirt (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

in addition, since I created the article, it would be better if someone else removed it. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 17:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, that's another reason that I've not removed it. Most of the larger newspaper info is in 'newsbank archives' and I've not had a chance to log in through my county library system to see those full articles. I guess it comes down to if playing around the country is notable enough. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 17:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My only concern about your edit is that it reads "Jewish Terrorism" and then "Palestinian Political Violence". Either Jewish Terrorism should be merged into "Jewish Political Violence" or "Palestinian Political Violence" should be moved to "Palestinian Terrorism." Besides that, I don't see a big problem with its inclusion. If it were included, I would rather see the article be reorganized such that there is a section on organized crime, a section on general crime, and then a section on terrorism/political violence. That sort of reorganization should probably happen anyways. Tiger Khan (talk) 18:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany, an article written by you attained FA status. Congratulations! Keep it going! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 13:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Victuallers (talk) 11:19, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crime in Oman, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--BorgQueen (talk) 14:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crime in the United Arab Emirates, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:21, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, must have inadvertently skipped over your name when I was handing out the credits. Gatoclass (talk) 04:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They quite possibly can be the same person, but as they have stopped their disruptive editing, I think we can let it go. If they vandalise further on the account, they will be blocked. – Skyezx^message 01:53, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I removed the image you added to Child abuse, but my edit summary was too quick and short, so I thought I'd say hello and explain.

The image was a photo of the result of general violence; although a child was hurt, it does not illustrate the topic of child abuse, it illustrates war or rioting.

But more importantly, I think the topic of child abuse is too broad to be depicted with an image; by using an image it can distract, or divert the attention from the important concepts in the text, lots of which can't be shown because they are psychological/emotional/developmental, etc.

Maybe you don't agree, but I wanted to offer my thoughts on it beyond a cursory edit summary,.

Have a good one...

--Jack-A-Roe (talk) 04:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an illustrated work, so a picture/pictures is/are appropriate. No view on this particular image. Ty 11:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You once mentioned that I could request you for help. Could you please help me deal with the appropriateness of deleting External links on

]

I just responded to the image statement on my talk. Thanks for your guidance. I am trying to be as reasonable as possible. Recordfreenow (talk) 07:57, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You posted on my talk page. Did you mean to do that? I can't see any speedy delete tag. It's a Commons image, so any deletion will be there.[3] Ty 11:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was tagged as lacking a source, it now has a source, so there's no immeadiate possibility of deletion. The source's copyright is really unclear, though, and probably not strictly acceptable. Notably, images used here need to be both modifiable and commercially useable, it's not clear that it what is meant. Your best bet is to ask them if they'll license it for both, under either the

WP:OTRS). WilyD 13:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks I have posted a request on CT:L. I think I will get it sorted out. Your help and efforts are appeciated. Recordfreenow (talk) 18:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI... All steps were completed. We have received the permission for the image(s) and OTRS has made the necessary

modifications to the Image page(s). Recordfreenow (talk) 10:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Made some changes. here Recordfreenow (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crime in Saudi Arabia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

Congratulations and keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 04:07, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

could you please look into kashmir clouds edit history as he is blatantly vote stacking to gain votes from indian editors to keep the POK page i dont know how to deal with canvassing so could you help? 86.158.235.148 (talk) 13:21, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully you realized you gave him 3 different warnings and reported him to AIV all after his last edit. ;)   jj137 (talk) 18:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not understand what you are saying? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:21, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You gave him a 3rd warning, a last warning, and an only warning (and then reported him to AIV) when he had stopped editing.   jj137 (talk) 18:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my mistake, he kept editing, but hadn't edited any more at the time.   jj137 (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I issued him three warnings for the three different pages he vandalized. I did not report him to the AIV, but I was about to report him if he vandalized any article again after the only warning. But he is already blocked. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry for the misunderstanding. I wasn't sure about it. (and I misread the AIV report.) Bad mistake on my part.   jj137 (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've recommended that this article be merged into Discrimination against atheists. I've started a discussion here if you want to add something. AzureFury (talk | contribs) 01:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take it out if its not appropriate - I wasn't sure if Cat:spiders was deathly serious for biological specimens only, or if it allowed any kind of spider, artistic depictions of and that sort of thing. I guess its the former!!

]

Kristina Keneally

I specifically did not add in a reference to my edit as a fact like this is easily checked against official sources, such as the NSW government website. I am a wikipedian whose personal style is one of resisting over-referencing as otherwise all articles will become awkward to read and cumbersome. However I do favour referencing where the statement in question may be controversial or is otherwise subject to conjecture (not the case here).

However if you would like to add in your own references to this article regarding the elevation of Ms Keneally to a new portfolio, I point you in the direction of this article in the SMH or Keneally's webpage on the official NSW government website. Kind regards--Calabraxthis ^(talk) 11:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crime in Kuwait, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--BorgQueen (talk) 01:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would depend what you're trying to source. If it's a very general statement, then it's probably okay — but if it's a more complicated statement that delves into actual crime stats, then you'd probably be better off tracking down the sources that Lonely Planet used. Bearcat (talk) 07:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Preface it with "According to Lonely Planet, pickpocketing is..." Bearcat (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please look at this[request] and suggest or validate? Recordfreenow (talk) 11:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks my friend for supporting on semi protection. I don't know you but it is terribly tough to find people to discuss and communicate on Wikipedia. It appears to be a mad rush. No one bothers to ask questions or correct you. Everyone wants to have their own POV. I am afraid I may also be behaving similarly. I don't even know if it is worth it to contribute anymore. I just came from a meeting where we were actually seeking Him to show us how to rehabilitate 120 destiture women that were saved from temple prostitution. And the thought came to my mind about the aggressive editors and whether they would even care to enter their hands into this dirt and getting involved with restoring broken lives. I am not sure. I am sorry to vent on you but I may not be able to carry forward with reporting and providing much inputs to this article anymore. I will try but cannot be sure. there does not appear to be any sense in it. I guess I am losing inspiration. Do you think it is worth it? Keep up the good work on your contributions. I appreciate your desire to act fairly and in a non-partisan manner. Recordfreenow (talk) 17:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crime in Bahrain, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:15, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crime in Qatar, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--BorgQueen (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crime in the Maldives, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The 25 DYK Medal
		I hereby award Otolemur crassicaudatus the 25 DYK medal for some interesting and varied contributions to grace the main page. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on this! While we all have had our disagreements, I think we can both agree that you've done an excellant job here. Congrats! Your friend Eddy of the wiki^{[citation needed]} 20:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Otolemur, I seek council & perhaps assistance. As you may have noticed there is a bit of an edit war at

have been repeatedly reinserting it (and finding new POV bits to insert). Jobxavier is the worst offender, and, to be frank, his conduct leads me to desire to bring a RfC regarding him. You're more experienced than I, so I was wondering if firstly, you think this is the appropriate action; secondly, what to do about the requirement in Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment#Request_comment_on_users that "at least two editors must have contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and tried but failed to resolve the problem"? I mean to say, I've contacted him; to a lesser extent User:vvarkey has contacted him, but with no difference to his conduct; moreover, how does one try to resolve the problem when, in essence, he just needs to stop? I guess my question is, has enough been done to satisfy this requirement as of yet, or do additional steps need to be taken? Finally, if you agree with the above, and if you're familiar with RfCs, would you care to help me out with this? Best regards, Gabrielthursday (talk) 08:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My name was added to the conflict resolution area [here]. Is this the right place to be? I seek your counsel. As always :). Recordfreenow (talk) 03:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Otolemur, I made a response in mediation [here]. I hope I am being fair. Thanks. Recordfreenow (talk) 06:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crime in Singapore, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--BorgQueen (talk) 07:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking over whats there...

All 3 images are fine from the stand point of free use.

I'd leave the infobox one alone, since it's of the bridge proper.

As for the dragons...

I'd move Dragon Bridge.jpg (the detail of just the dragon) to the left side (so the dragon faces into the article) and just under the "Architecture" header. That section seems to be the primary place where the inclusion of the statues as a design element should be discussed.

And I'd lose Image:Zmajski most-Ljubljana.JPG. I'ts a good image, but unless there is a discussion about the design on the bulwark, it's redundant to the sculpture image. And it won;t be lost since it looks like it's included in the Commons gallery.

Hope that helps,

- J Greb (talk) 16:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you created this which was later merged. In light of recent incidents in India, such as

]

I have restored it and requesting your valuable contribs there. --Googlean (talk) 05:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just nominated List of United States journalism scandals for deletion. I don't see the point of two articles giving the same information. Redddogg (talk) 19:43, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason there is soapboxing on the Masonic ritual AfD is because there is no difference in the material in this article from the material in the Freemasonry article aside from the Christian controversy section. Therefore, the article was broken out specifically to add this criticism, which is already addressed in multiple other articles (and of the six sources used, three are in that one section). That makes it a negative advocacy problem, which is especially egregious because the criticisms leveled are generic and have nothing to do with anything in the article itself. MSJapan (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am tired again and wanting to give up. Do you think

]

Eaglehawk

Eaglehawk was a mining boom town in the 1850's (the

]

Tim Conboy

At what area do you inquire about a reliable source for the article? All I did was add more info on his playing career per hockeydb.com, as I would do to any player bio with just two or three lines in it, just to expand it a little bit. Raphie (talk) 16:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vote of confidence at the AfD. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see that you were one of the participants in the recent AfD on the article Christianity and Judaism. That AfD recommended (in a snowball result) that the article be merged into Judeo-Christian. However, since the AfD concerns have been raised, most notably

• Per
  Islam and Judaism
  .
• The reason the article Judeo-Christian exists, as its own hatnote declares, is specifically to survey the history and use of that word-phrase -- which has its own controversy, and its own tale to tell. (See here where I've set things out in a bit more detail.) That story is a good fit for its own article, and will get completely lost if the contents of Christianity and Judaism get inappropriately dumped on top of it.

Having contacted the closing admin,

the new consensus should be followed, rather than the AfD decision, without the need for a DRV or a new AfD.

Concerns about the proposed merge have also been expressed by

).

This post is therefore to let you know that that discussion is underway, at Talk:Christianity and Judaism#Overly speedy deletion, with a view to perhaps setting aside the AfD decision.

Of course, some significant issues were raised in the AfD about the article in its present form, so the best way forward is a question that needs some thought. Please feel welcome to come and participate! Jheald (talk) 07:50, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of traps in the Saw film series, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of traps in the Saw film series (2nd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? CyberGhostface (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Issues on a term in some articles you have been involved in editing here, if you are interested to participate in the discussion, please join. Thanks. --Googlean ^Results 02:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant to rename it to May 1998 Afghanistan earthquake, but perhaps it's fine as is. —Ceran^{(sing / see)} 13:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just add {{

]

re: further readings

"Websites and online publications are normally listed in the "External links" section instead of in this section, although editors occasionally prefer to merge very short lists of publications and external links into this section." All the readings were were to online publications. Anyway, let's move it to the talk page, easier there. Lihaas (talk) 09:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropped in to say good work on this article. You have significantly improved the article started yesterday by me. --GPPande talk! 11:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added four reviews to Mick Brown (journalist). You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mick Brown (journalist). See also -- Eastmain (talk) 21:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[4]

Block him, please. I reverted his change, and saw you had left a warning on his talk page.Yachtsman1 (talk) 06:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo, well done!! Bit of a one track mind on that particular issue, don't you think?--Yachtsman1 (talk) 07:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting vandalism to my userpage. Today was the first time I met you during reverting vandalism, and I must say you're pretty fast :) You beat me to it several times. Have a cookie.

Chamal ^talk 08:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure. Thanks! Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the vandilisim. I got confused. I tryed to edit the previous vandalisim and i must have accidently red did it. I am VERY sorry. —Preceding

]

Kaltio

"Kaltio is a main Finnish magazine cultural magazine." Right. So what issue, what page number, where is the online reference? Why not just say that you saw it on TV? A reference should include enough information for other editors to easily verify your content in ENGLISH. Your references did not do this. Bob98133 (talk) 13:15, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I agree we should avoid this reference for controversial statements. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that... I'll make sure to keep an eye out next time. Thank you. ~~ Sintaku ^Talk 16:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I really enjoyed the article by the way, keep up the good work! --Winterus (talk) 17:50, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wanted to let you know I reverted two of your edits [5][6] that added category:pseudoscience to

]

I've gone through

]

Re: Hindu Taliban

Your DYK nomination was accepted and I moved it into the queue to be featured on the main page. —

]

Please check

talk/_contribs 15:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

No worries; we recently changed the DYK process, thanks to the creation by

talk/_contribs 15:37, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Archiving assistance

Hi Otolemur.  :) Would it be alright if I setup an archive bot for your talkpage? I noticed that the page is very long, over 160K, and some people's browsers start having trouble with anything over 32K. But I could setup a bot which would automatically archive any threads which had been inactive for awhile, and then you wouldn't have to worry about it anymore? Let me know, --Elonka 17:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hindu Taliban, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

Thank you for your contributions! - Cheers,

]

Really?

Wow! I haven't formatted my page much. But well, if you really like it then it simply great. Thanks! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 07:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You had participated in the AFD on Sikh Extremism. I've had some time to look into the article and commented on the talk page here. Thanks, --RoadAhead ^=Discuss= 01:00, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Sir my article named "Property Standard" has been deleted

19:42, 21 November 2008 Hut 8.5 (Talk | contribs) deleted "Property Standard" ‎ (G11: Blatant advertising)

But sir this is not kind of any advertisement and i am trying to expand Wikiepdia with my knowledge as Property Standard is a magazine IN pakistan Lahore and i gave the reference of thier website aswell, I am sure people would benfit from what i wrote about this magazine, I will be gratefl if you Put the article back on. Regards, Shahzad [email protected] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shehzi123 (talk • contribs) 10:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:) -- Tinu Cherian - 11:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi just a little answer to your question. Boys in Red was coined by numerous new organisations after the accident in reference to the players killed in the accident. A fund titled Boys in Red Fund was also settup following the accident in order to raise money for memorials to those killed. I figured since The Boys in Red seemed to be an almost universally accepted name for the accident in Canada that it seemed suitable as an article title on Wikipedia. Do you have suggestions for a better name? :) --Kuzwa (talk) 23:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Cold_fusion/Archive_17#Should_the_article_be_placed_in_the_category_of_.22pseudoscience.22 --Enric Naval (talk) 23:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. A few weeks back, you made what I felt was an insensitive reply to a post on the RefDesk and I replied to you with some rather impolite remarks of my own. In the time since then I've come to realize that while your reply might have been a little brusque, mine was extremely rude and completely uncalled for. I have also seen your many knowledgeable replies to other questions and I realize that I could have driven off a valuable contributor with a hasty edit of ill-chosen words. Frankly, I'm a little embarrassed by my outburst; I normally try to conduct myself with a little more decorum. Please accept my apologies. Matt Deres (talk) 02:50, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem. Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Read this to get a better idea how they make money:

http://calacanis.com/2006/03/06/firefox-mozilla-corporation-mozilla-foundation-made-72m-last/

Have a good day!
--Grandscribe (talk) 08:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, keep an eye on these two articles will you. The anonymous user 60.50.67.78 has been adding repetitive statements and sometimes dubious links (a travel review site to the Shanty town article referring to the largest slum, which in my view is not a credible source). I think if the anonymous user keeps on editing like this, warnings should perhaps be filed.--TheLeopard (talk) 11:38, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article you created,

is about to be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Half_to_Death.

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

1. You can list the page up for deletion on
   Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page
   .
2. You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here:
   Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User
   . But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
   
3. When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of
   WP:Deletion debate acronyms
   which may support the page you created being kept.
   Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
4. You can merge the article into a larger article.

If your page is deleted, you still

]

Fort Dearborn move

The Fort Dearborn article was moved yesterday without discussion. I've put out a request to have it moved back to its original location. As you've edited the Fort Dearborn article in the passed, please weigh in on the discussion on the current

]

Acadieville merge

Hi, longtime since we spoke, hope you've been well. There's a merger proposal at Talk:Acadieville Parish, New Brunswick re an article that you created. Your input would be welcome. WereSpielChequers 22:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:29, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Labor / Worker's Rights project

I recently drafted a proposal for a Worker's Rights & Labor Issues WikiProject ... I thought you might be interested, since you are working on the Anarchism project ...

Cheers! Jrtayloriv (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Victims of political repression by country

renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

This CFD also covers all sub-cats, including Category:Victims of American political repression, which you created. Cgingold (talk) 22:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of of Category:Americans accused of spying for the Russian Federation

A tag has been placed on Category:Americans accused of spying for the Russian Federation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Violates

WP:G10#G10 as accusations only disparage the subject; consensus has shown to delete these categories, as shown here

Under the

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon

}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Category:Americans accused of spying for the Russian Federation|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Σxplicit 04:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

CfD nomination of Category:Victims of American political repression

I have nominated

talk) 03:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Earthquakes Project Newsletter

The WikiProject Earthquakes newsletter for September 2009 has been released. Be sure to check on our status. ceranthor 11:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive

Hello. After a recent reoganization of WikiProject Volcanoes, we have established an "inactive" list. As your account has not edited for over 4 months, I am sorry to imform you that you're being moved to the list. If you wish to refute this and are indeed active, I am sorry for the mistake and you can revert my action. Thank you and happy holidays, ResMar 14:02, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Human experimentation in the United States

As the creator of this category, you may be interested in Talk:Human_subject_research#Human_subject_research_vs_human_experimentation_.28NPOV_title.29.

Global Network for the Forecasting of Earthquakes

Hi Otolemur.This article have been kept.And now nominated again Articles for deletion.Some users demonstrate preconceived opinion.If you have time, could you take a look at the Global Network for the Forecasting of Earthquakes.I'd appreciate a second opinion.Thanks.--Earth Defender (talk) 11:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Hindu fascist

for deletion

Hindu fascist, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu fascist until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ϢereSpielChequers 12:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New page As you may know, the project is inactive, but I just joined. I thought that we should verify that each member is active. If you want to keep being in this wikiproject, please write "# {{user|Otolemur crassicaudatus}}" here; if you do not do it before 19:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC), you will be removed from the list. All the users that were removed will be put onto this page. Thank you,

~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 19:40, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Four Award

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany. LittleMountain5 16:26, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! LittleMountain5 16:26, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pirito Purush Pati Parishad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the

talk) 05:14, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Science fiction film of India

The article

Science fiction film of India has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

"Science fiction film of India". It refers to a genre of films, which are not very popular in the country. The article has no sources saying that these are the only films ever made. In fact, a category or a template would be a much better option than keep an article, as some films have not received much of a notice and some have. If anyone wants to highlight the fact that xXx is a science fiction film, all they have to do is add the category or template to it. To put it short, this article has no significance to highlight a specific genre of films.

This can be redirected to Cinema of India, for an option an article about Indian cinema, which might have space for some of the content this one shows.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

X.One ^SOS 13:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Hindu Taliban for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hindu Taliban is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu Taliban (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hindu Taliban for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hindu Taliban is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu Taliban (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 09:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOUR RFC

There are two

WP:WAWARD) 07:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Category:Rapists by nationality

Category:Rapists by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

MfD nomination of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Hindu Taliban

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Hindu Taliban during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Category:Religious violence in India has been nominated for discussion

Category:Religious violence in India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shyamsunder (talk) 21:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Religious violence in India has been nominated for discussion

Category:Religious violence in India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shyamsunder (talk) 07:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Hitcher has been nominated for deletion

Category:The Hitcher has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wrong Turn films has been nominated for renaming

talk) 10:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

MfD nomination of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/AF

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/AF during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 23:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

MfD nomination of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/RAAN

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/RAAN during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 00:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Category:Money launderers by nationality has been nominated for renaming

Category:Money launderers by nationality has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 22 § Category:American money launderers

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 22 § Category:American money launderers on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 18:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Otolemur_crassicaudatus&oldid=1186375193"