User talk:Lachlan2009

Hi Lachlan2009! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Garuda3 (talk) 07:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All the sources in this draft are primary. We need significant coverage in secondary sources to show this proposed train station is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Burgess Park Station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lachlan2009! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Waddesdon railway station—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lachlan2009, please stop altering the services boxes of London Underground stations. Your changes are introducing excessive detail, and some of it is just plain wrong. For example, District services from Windsor never ran east of Mansion House. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Old Kent Road Tube Station. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I appreciate that you're trying to create track layout for stations. However, when creating please follow this draft convention as this is how 100+ other stations' diagram formats are. [1]. Also, please do not revert the route map for Yarra Valley Railway as your version have sections under restoration marked as in service, and inaccurate information that Yering and Coldstream are proposed extensions. You're welcome to prove me wrong if you have recent and reliable third-party source that says otherwise. Purin128AL (talk) 15:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:LachlanTansey per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LachlanTansey. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

at this point im just going to accept my punishment if you ever do decide to unblock me (which i highly doubt) i will still read wikipedia frequently Lachlan2009 (talk) 03:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]