User talk:Last ditch effort

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

You people that blocked me are being very mean here! Still declined? Ugh! New account! What?! I can’t make a new account because I’m blocked?! NO!

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
57 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Spotted ratfish (talk) Add sources
99 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Holocephali (talk) Add sources
117 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Acanthodii (talk) Add sources
25 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Glossary of ichthyology (talk) Add sources
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Cladodont (talk) Add sources
39 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start National Biodiversity Network (talk) Add sources
9 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Stethacanthidae (talk) Cleanup
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C
talk
)
Cleanup
53 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Atlantic Northeast (talk) Cleanup
100 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Neoarchean (talk) Expand
31 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B Kavirondo (talk) Expand
60 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Germania Slavica (talk) Expand
168 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Conodont (talk) Unencyclopaedic
36 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start The Sudans (talk) Unencyclopaedic
176 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Aumakua (talk) Unencyclopaedic
130 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Biomineralization (talk) Merge
52 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA South Polar region of the Cretaceous (talk) Merge
116 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Terrestrial locomotion (talk) Merge
49 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Semantic interoperability (talk) Wikify
250 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Sichuan Basin (talk) Wikify
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C
talk
)
Wikify
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Addanki Dayakar (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Alfred Legoyt (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Asylet (talk) Orphan
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Akmonistion (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Netsepoye (talk) Stub
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub First appearance datum (talk) Stub
21 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Orthacanthus (talk) Stub
172 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Semantic Scholar (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pacific nurse shark (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leaellyn Rich

Hello Last ditch effort,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

Leaellyn Rich
for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 11:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--Last ditch effort (talk) 14:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)PUT IT BACK! PLEASE![reply]

February 2021

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Spinosaurus, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop treating articles' talkpages like social media.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day/February 2021. --Mr Fink (talk) 01:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Carnegie collection. --Mr Fink (talk) 19:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Newslinger talk 19:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Last ditch effort (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please. Last ditch effort (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archeria should be written like: Archeria is an eel-like anthracosaur which lived in the Early Permian. It was A medium-sized aquatic predator with a length of 2 m (7 ft).[1]

{unblock|reason=This is not disruptive editing. I promise I will edit less if you unblock me. Please unblock me. Last ditch effort (talk) 14:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)}[reply]

{unblock|reason=Unblock me, please! Last ditch effort (talk) 14:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Last ditch effort (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Promise. Last ditch effort (talk) 14:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Making three unblock requests at a time is disruptive. And your suggested edit above is certainly not constructive. You'll get only one more chance at making an unblock request here, so I suggest you think carefully before doing so. Yamla (talk) 14:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.