User talk:LeonardoSmi

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lichengolist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lichengolist, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 15:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As i see the article was already created just yesterday https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lichenologist I guess it was thanks to the draft. --LeonardoSmi (talk) 09:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeonardoSmi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HenryTemplo (talk) 15:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LeonardoSmi -- Thanks for submitting this article. I've corrected some details; see the edit summaries. It doesn't seem to be gold open access for example. I'm also concerned that the Q1 ranking is unlikely to be true for a journal with an impact factor below 1; on a quick scan this doesn't seem to be in the sources you cite and I wonder if it is a cut-and-paste error? Please check and supply a working source for it. You might like to add the selective indexing services that the journal appears in, as this is the main way that the journals project assess notability. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 03:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you. You are right in questioning Q1, it is Q3, sorry my mistake I forgot to change it. Nevertheless, I think it is gold open access: https://www.elsevier.com/journals/annales-de-paleontologie/0753-3969/open-access-options --LeonardoSmi (talk) 13:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the indexing. From our article

gold open access requires all content to be open, which isn't the case here. I think it might be best classed as a hybrid open-access journal, though these days that's really the norm to the extent of being hardly worth stating. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 00:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Ok, thank you. I removed GOA, think it isn't necessary to mention it.LeonardoSmi (talk) 13:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your efforts in improving articles on academic journals, we can always use more editors in this area. Tips on how to create good articles can be found in our

Ok. Thx.LeonardoSmi (talk) 10:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

I've accepted this. If you have articles on journals from reputable publishers, with selective indexing and impact factors, moved to draftspace, I suggest you contact

WP:Academic Journals for assistance. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 00:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please

Hi, thanks, I tried to use just basic minimum but I will be more careful in future.LeonardoSmi (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Links are dead, this will give you time to get the article ready. Sources do exist - your first two are dead links. Follow the style of

MOS:CITE for reference format. Bruxton (talk) 17:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, thanks, I can check it.--LeonardoSmi (talk) 13:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the links and accepted this; see above note re

WP:Academic journals who might be able to help out if this happens in future. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you, it was done by mistake, I created redirect, cannot move it as new article is already created. If I should do something else and ask for deleteion somewhere, please write me, from the above link I m not sure what should I do.LeonardoSmi (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Perhaps the above cut-and--paste move was a mistake, but you did it again here: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. I just had to put in a lot of effort to repair the damage. Please do not do this again. --Randykitty (talk) 16:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am really sorry, at first I didn't know about this function and so I just checked the message, but didn't realize it in my future edit. Now I will be aware of it. Thank you for repair.LeonardoSmi (talk) 17:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, LeonardoSmi. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeonardoSmi

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username IceBergYYC, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|IceBergYYC}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

IceBergYYC (talk) 07:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've edited and created some preprint articles and think this is a big preprint server. In my POV, it is similar to the case with journals. You have sources such as databases, and it's ok.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Resources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MedRxiv

Research Square https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_preprint_repositories

LeonardoSmi (talk) 09:53, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_Square See Research Square, which I also created, has an advertising tag. So I tried to improve both. The problem is that for preprints and journals you need primary sources (databases).LeonardoSmi (talk) 10:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]