If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ridernyc 09:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Major League Baseball team captains, which you created or to which you contributed, should be
deleted . While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the
deletion policy .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major League Baseball team captains until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —KuyaBriBri Talk 18:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
Blue Jays Roster. Since you had some involvement with the
Blue Jays Roster redirect, you might want to participate in
the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).
Mhiji (
talk ) 14:08, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
Cardinals Roster. Since you had some involvement with the
Cardinals Roster redirect, you might want to participate in
the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).
Mhiji (
talk ) 14:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
Mariners Roster. Since you had some involvement with the
Mariners Roster redirect, you might want to participate in
the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).
Mhiji (
talk ) 14:12, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Federico Castañeda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federico Castañeda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Strikerforce (talk ) 09:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Federico Castañeda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federico Castañeda (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 21:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
]
Hello, Leonel-Favela. Voting in the
2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page . MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[ reply ]
Template:Águilas de Mexicali roster has been nominated for deletion . You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page . Frietjes (talk ) 11:45, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
Template:Off-season League Baseball roster has been nominated for deletion . You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page . Frietjes (talk ) 11:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello, Leonel-Favela. Voting in the
2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page . MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading File:Escudo San Luis Río Colorado.png . I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list ) at the site of the original publication ; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected] , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter OTRS pending
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected] .
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content , use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use }} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use , and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log . Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged , as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion . You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. B (talk ) 19:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Federico Castañeda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federico Castañeda (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hog Farm Talk 04:54, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[ reply ]