User talk:Loginnigol

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aunt Jemima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Postbellum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re this, I wrote the article and I worked from that source, and what they are discussing is NBC Studios in Burbank, not NBC Studios in New York. Nixon was not going to fly across the country to make that speech, which is what you are implying. If you want to disambiguate to the Burbank location, that's fine, but otherwise, you should most likely revert yourself.--Wehwalt (talk) 05:19, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's the point of this, after I'd already fixed it (10 minutes before you posted that? --Loginnigol 05:37, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Obviously I didn't see it. Part my fault for not checking, part yours for the lack of an edit summary. If it just says "undid xxx by Wehwalt", I probably don't assume anything else was done. Anyway, thank you for your improvements.--Wehwalt (talk) 05:46, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. --Loginnigol 05:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:17, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the video from Lorde? First person sources are very much acceptable for personal information, and now the info is unsourced. BollyJeff | talk 14:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On top of that the source is inconsistent with what is written (Lorde makes no reference to "Dalmatian"). -Loginnigol (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then keep the source and remove Dalmation. BollyJeff | talk 14:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Judson Laipply may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | "[[Bye Bye Bye]]"<br><small>(Lyrics played: ''Bye, bye, bye''</small> || [['N Sync]] || 5:52–6:00 || 2000

Thanks,

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to FCC (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Christian College|Forman Christian College/University]], a chartered university in Lahore, Pakistan)

Thanks,

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dearborn, Michigan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• owns the "Dearborn Towers" apartment complex in [[Clearwater, Florida|Clearwater]], [[Florida]]). These holdings are considered part of the city of Dearborn, and revenues generated by camp

Thanks,

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wake Me Up (Avicii song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Get Lucky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Next time you change something because there is no valid source given do the same to the entire text/article where there is no valid source given and not just to the part you don't like. How typically European to keep anything that says good things about anything European, no matter how false it is, and remove anything good about others even though it is correct. Any changes you made were restored and your unfair edit was reported.

WTF? What on earth are you referring about? And why are not signing, mister 69.145.84.36? -Loginnigol (talk) 10:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is a real category; so, I removed your speedy tag. Bearian (talk) 20:38, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Variety Performance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. REDIRECT Target page name

What...? So a direct reference to his own site is not reliable...? Ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FaceOffTournament (talk • contribs) 20:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to a third party reliable source as well. There is no going around that. Sorry mate but those are the rules. --Loginnigol (talk) 21:13, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at West End Records. Your edits have been reverted or removed. If you are engaged in an article

It's the other way around. YOU are the disruptive one who changed an already existing link written as "garage" and are persisting that it should be "garage house". That makes YOU the one who is edit warring (changing something disputed without consensus). What you are doing is basically jump in, change something and then yell STOP to others - that's not how it works on Wikipedia. What you should have done is FIRST go to the talk page and argue your case as to why it should NOT be what was there already, namely "garage" (the proper name of the genre according to reliable sources) but be changed to "garage house" (which is an internet misnomer invented for convenience). If your argument is good then you can convince not only others but even me! But so far however you have ZERO argument (the talk page is still empty) --Loginnigol (talk) 01:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tennis Court (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royals (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You recently made a series of edits to the article entitled Premetro. Did you see the comments from a couple of months ago at Talk:Premetro?

I nominated the article for deletion about three months ago. One of my concerns then was that the article was almost completely unreferenced. I felt no transit system should be listed as a premetro system unless a reliable source explicitly called it a premetro system. User:IJBall and I discussed my concerns. I had said I was going to remove every system from the list that didn't have a reference to a reliable source that explicitly called it a premetro system. and he or she asked me to wait until 2014.

I waited. It is now 2014.

Do you think you have reliable sources that explicitly call the systems you worked on were premetro systems?

If there is a reason why you think I am calling for a standard that is too stringent, could you explain your reasoning on Talk:Premetro? Geo Swan (talk) 05:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided references for the intro. Premetro is Stadtbahn. That's it. Nothing more nothing less. Once and for all to end the confusion I have more-prominently cross-connected this article with the other article.

I do agree with you that the list of examples need to be more stringently checked to see if those are real premetros. Many of those listed are not! They are just simply normal conventional trams or light rails that accidentally pass under standalone isolated tram-tunnels that were built with no plans (in the past or present) to upgrade them to be used by a heavier system, i.e. metro. So you can remove those — I have done that myself. Keeping them there is misinformation and cause of the confusion. —Loginnigol (talk) 10:24, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Platinum (color) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• certifications|platinum album]] is an album whose sales figures have reached a certain amount (this threshold differs from market to market - in the [[United States]], a platinum album is one

Thanks,

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Westboro Baptist Church may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• mdy dates|date=January 2012}}
• "Court Says GI Funeral Protests Legal"], ''[[The Baltimore Sun]]'', September 25, 2009]</ref> On March 30, 2010, the appeals court ordered Albert Snyder to pay the church's court costs

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Yes it's because of a dab page. Thanks for the heads up. —Loginnigol (talk) 13:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! TheReferenceChecker (talk) 12:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I adjusted one of your many edits to Aachen back. The Latin/Italian term for Aachen, regardless of what the German Wikipedians have agreed upon as we are a separate entity, is a worthwile piece of information because as one reads the history of Aachen, one will realize that Aachen or Aquisgrana was a settlement in Latin times hence the latin name. I do understand the argument that the German Wiki uses in that who cares what the egyptian translation for Aachen is, but Latin is relevant and as far as Latin or Italian the reference that I verified definitely refers to what I changed it to "Aquisgrana" as a Latin term not Italian. Now with that said, I don't know if it is also Italian and if it is you could throw Italian up as well while leaving the Latin up there, but then we may be going down that road our Bavarian friends discussed. Also I wasn't sure how I felt about you removeing the Swastika comment and I almost put it back, but I prefer to wait on that one as I don't feel that strongly about it and would wish to have a dialog with you as to why you felt that was an unneeded piece of the article; however, if we decide to keep it out, then we(you) should probably remove the "Schmetz" Reference which will no longer be used. I forgot to open my comment with my normal, Please don't take me the wrong way as I am not trying to step on toes, merely improve the article and the wiki in general. Cheers speednat (talk) 18:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK - agreed!

Agreed about I assume the Latin/Italian, but what do you feel about the Swastika comment... like why did you feel it necessary to remove it, how strongly do you feel, etc. speednat (talk) 21:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a news dump of every isolated incident. There is a place for that: Wikinews.

Could you bring this to talk if you want to move it against consensus? From the time I was a kid this has been the Italian Open. When Borg won in 1978 it was the Italian Open. When Courier won in 1992 it was the Italian Open. When Nadal won in 2013 it was the Italian Open. When Muster won in 1995 it was the Italian Open. So I'm not sure why you would say it's never been the Italian Open. That's what it's always been in the Open Era. We could go back further to 1957 when Lew Hoad played in the "Italian Championships", but since it's been "open" for 45 years that should be good enough. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Let it be so then. —Loginnigol (talk) 16:33, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boko Haram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Shabab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the new comments on

updated ;-) (not meant to "clutter" your talk page, just want to be sure you're aware of new comments that I added) 98.70.74.244 (talk) 03:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Coldplay. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Radiopathy •talk• 16:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Loginnigol, you have a user email waiting with instructions on how to get access to BNA via the Wikipedia Library Partnership, Sadads (talk) 16:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Really like the user name, Sadads (talk) 16:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

^Done! Thanks for the heads up. —Loginnigol (talk) 20:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey loginnigol, I have approved your access to Wikipedia:Keesings but need you to follow the instructions in the email I sent a week ago. Sadads (talk) 15:52, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have record of you completing the Google form sent to you via email, please follow those instructions, Sadads (talk) 18:57, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Loginnigol. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 13:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm

}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 13:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to

Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at WP:JSTOR . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved.[reply]

Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to Oxford University Press's humanities materials through the TWL partnership described at WP:OUP . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email from User:Nikkimaria several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:OUP/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 22:12, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are receiving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:OUP/Approved.[reply]

Hello, Loginnigol. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 23:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm

}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 23:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lenco Turntables, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burgdorf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you introduced some sort of error into the Oxford spelling article in your edit of 19:13, 3 May 2014‎. Please see this. What did the source actually say? Where exactly is that quote from? —BarrelProof (talk) 22:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 23:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Grampasso88

Hello Loginnigol. Just to give a heads up on some developments with a user you had warned last month. Grampasso88 (talk · contribs) has recently made another questionable page move at Mount Stanley. I have reverted that move and reported the user to AIV. I should mention I did see in at least one source that the highest point of Mount Stanley is named "Margherita Peak". So this may be a good faith edit, though there are some other outstanding edits in user's contribution history that look suspicious. At this point there has been no response AIV. If there is no action from AIV and the recommendation is to report to ANI, I was wondering if you would want to make that report since you seem to have a better idea what the user is up to. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 01:34, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Afraid it's far worse than I originally thought. I tried to move another page,

Lake Margherita of Savoy back to the original title and got this, which I believe is a result the user editing the redirect page created during the move. A very sneaky and effective trick, because now it takes an admin to move it back. This can cause a huge fiasco (and has in other pages in the past) if there is any kind of support at all for the new name, because if no consensus is reached, the default is keep the current name. I will keep you updated. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 01:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Discussion of Indian Chief move

I have started a discussion at Talk:Indian Chief (motorcycle)#Any particular reason why this was moved?. Your input there would be appreciated. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 14:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello, Loginnigol,

The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you were one of the very first testers of VisualEditor, back in 2012 or early 2013. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work better for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Unsubscribe from this list • Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletter • Translate the user guide

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TWL HighBeam check-in

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope

The Wikipedia Library

has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stroopwafel -> Dutch waffle move discussion

Hi Loginnigol. I started a discussion on

Talk:Dutch waffle#renamed.3F.3F.3F about your recent move of Stroopwafel to Dutch waffle. You may want to comment there. Arnoutf (talk) 13:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of newspapers in Belgium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Meuse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities with the most skyscrapers

Hi, all the entries in the list have individual references and have been there for the longest time before you replaced them with your new table which is unsourced, unlinked and unverified. So if you insist on using your version, add the required

WP:RS, WP links and follow the format! Thanks--RioHondo (talk) 18:06, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Molenbeek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Michelin starred restaurants

Did you not read my edit summary? I said VE screwed up the italics. Also, 80% of the list was in non-italics. Two choices. Remove the other italics or fix the ones VE screwed up. Don't do a blind revert and leave VE's mess in there. Bgwhite (talk) 05:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Volkswagen Touareg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saharan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nord-Pas-de-Calais may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Nord–Pas-de-Calais''' ({{IPA-fr|nɔʁ pɑ d(ə) ka.lɛ|-|Fr-Paris--Nord-Pas-de-Calais.ogg}}; ''Nord'' for short, is one of the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

talk) 23:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 13:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 13:46, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clock tower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghanta Ghar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

List of tallest church buildings in the world, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Peter and St. Paul's Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Loginnigol. You have new messages at Barkeep's talk page.
Message added 15:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Please discuss before doing further reverts. Barkeep^Chat/_$ 15:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste move

Hello Loinnigol. Please undo your recent change at Sabr. Wait for an admin to deal with your request at WP:RMTR. Trying to move an article by cut and paste destroys article history. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Breitbart News Network

Please go to the talk page and discuss before reverting. I believe you are misunderstanding Wikipedia policy. FuriouslySerene (talk) 15:47, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mansory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hot 'n Now, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sturgis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussants needed at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4

Since you are among the editors who made at least 10 edits to "

WP:WAWARD) 15:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Dutch champions

All information needs to be directly cited. There is no evidence that reliable sources are tracking winners by city, it's not at the RSSSF source. The 'Performances' section mainly duplicates the other Titles section, except the source is not summarising runners-up positions or summarising titles by club. Eldumpo (talk) 06:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I don't understand your tracking and RSSSF issues here. The location of the clubs does not at all require some special source (all the clubs have an individual Dutch wikipedia article already and so even you can verify the city location (and if you found discrepancy then make the appropriate correction). And the "performances" table is standard on all or most "champion" wikipedia page. The whole point of that table (as well as the city table) is not to duplicate information but to provide other relevant information or angle that otherwise is either not available at all or obscure to the uninformed reader in the main table, in this case there "performance years" per club are in one row and so one has a whole bird-eye view in what era across multiple centuries a particular club was dominant (I suppose one can spend minutes scrolling up and down and sifting thru the big championship history table and get the same data but the aim is to prevent the reader from doing such tedious activity.

Nevertheless I have considered and followed your reductive instinct and reduced stuff (removed the offtopic "loser" info as this is literally about champions and not second and third placed ones; and also removed the "total wins of all clubs" columns/rows out of at least one table). Anyway at least be glad that the English page doesn't have "wins per province" like the Dutch one has :) Loginnigol (talk) 13:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your further response, and I note the additional changes you have made to the page. However, there is no evidence that reliable sources are compiling a list of winners by city, and therefore this is

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Also, Wikipedia is not a source itself and its not enough to just point to another Wiki page for a source. Regards. Eldumpo (talk) 17:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Page A says club A is located in city A. Page B says club B is located in city B. Putting this in one table is not synthesis but copying the item verbatim. No new conclusion is drawn (no synthesis) and no new connections or claims are created (there is no "other stuff") about either of the separate clubs or their whereabouts. All the stat does is filter the already existing info by the relevant concept "city"(customary on football club champions wiki articles as you can see at the List of English football champions page. Also as you can see there on the England page, there is no separate source provided for the "by city" table because the information within it is already found at at both the big table above (regarding the championships) and at the separate individual wikipedia page of the club (regarding the locations). In other words I agree with your removal of the source if that may mislead the reader and give impression that the whole table is compiled by the source. Loginnigol (talk) 19:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The synthesis (or perhaps it's conflation really) is occurring as reliable sources are not showing it is notable to list championships by city, whereas you/we at Wikipedia are suggesting listing by cities is notable (but on what basis?). You seem to recognise there is no reference for this ('customary'), and the presence of any uncited/notable information on one page is not a reason to include it at another page. I would argue that the city (and yes, region!) info at the English article is also not notable (unless directly sourced) but that is another matter. Eldumpo (talk) 21:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I was trying to thank you for this edit, but it would not work (something about script failure, it said). Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 11:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melbourne Central. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Talk:Public Ivy does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.
Indeed. Please try to make a habit of this. It wasn't at all clear what you intended, or actually did, with your edit and after looking at it am still not quite certain. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 02:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hummel International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited KTM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austrian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Loginnigol. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Last Tango in Paris

Hi, I think your last edit made the article much more confusing and I'd like to revert unless you think that info can be integrated into that section in a different way.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 03:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Doorn Records

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Doorn Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doorn Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Karst (talk) 21:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tomorrowland logo.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Bannon orphaned reference

Hi, this edit removed the "TIME" ref, but it's still used elsewhere in the article. 209.6.229.194 (talk) 14:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bannon

Thank you for cleaning up my Bannon edit. I was editing for coverage, not grace. On the matter of education "randomly dropped", the structure I chose was purely time sequential, which is by default always the best policy. Revising existing language to the least degree contributed the rest of the context. For myself, I would still prefer simple time sequence, with education achieved before career presented before career. — MaxEnt 00:30, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm TheMagnificentist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Dimitri Vegas & Like Mike, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! - TheMagnificentist 03:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitri Vegas & Like Mike

This source does not say Dimitri Vegas & Like Mike are born in Greece. - TheMagnificentist 06:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It actually does. Allmusic literally states "Greece born". Your edit there and comments here indicate that you totally missed it. Please read sources thoroughly. Loginnigol (talk) 06:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Loginnigol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Loginnigol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Manchester2". The reason given for Manchester2's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia".

• Blocking administrator: Ronhjones (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Autoblock has expired. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 13:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably you can explain this? --

^"talk" 19:38, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

I thought it was unambiguous. The tag I copy-pasted here is due to a clear case of the IP sharing - this "Manchester2" may continue to be blocked (with any IP). But so long as Wikipedia has no issue with multiple vandals using this particualr IP address it's OK unblock it (for other users, thus also me).

Uncredited listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Uncredited. Since you had some involvement with the Uncredited redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Bearcat (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Loginnigol. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of best-selling music artists, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.--Harout72 (talk) 12:48, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 20:17, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Recent edits

Hi Loginnigol, I saw you recently added three new subsections to the

here on the talk page. Could you come and discuss it there? Thank you. Tarafa15 (talk) 08:38, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Loginnigol. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Short list

It's hard to believe that you have 27K edits and yet tagged this article with

WP:CSD#A7. You obviously haven't read the language of those criteria. A1 can't possibly apply to an article of that length, and A7 does not apply to concepts. Please be much more careful in the future or stay away from speedy tagging.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:29, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

American politics discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:32, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

Balad Air Base (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mortaritaville

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:53, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tulsi Gabbard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mortaritaville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts

. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Tiderolls 16:47, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Royal Scots

Hi - Just so you are aware, we don't usually apply "the" for regimental names. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 16:44, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Search Engines

Hello, could you help me locate on the alexa page the 165 you recently changed? |[[Ask.com]]**||Multilingual|| 165<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/ask.com|title=Ask.com Traffic, Demographics and Competitors - Alexa|website=www.alexa.com|access-date=2018-12-28}}</ref> Thank you, Oopocmoeraki (talk) 06:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Alexa page is already provided so it's strange that you are not able to find it. By the way the ranking is no longer 165 — it has gone down. You must understand that the ranking is a fluid number that is constantly evolving. --Loginnigol 11:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kebab (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned

disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the

see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:56, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

December 2019

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Andre Agassi. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:36, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited K9, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

It would have been vice to see you contributing to the talk page discussion and not just blindly putting the same edit back in without discussion. WCM_email 15:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Looted art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hermitage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dansk tilbagetrækning fra EU / Danish withdrawal from the European Union

Can you support this page https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dansk_tilbagetr%C3%A6kning_fra_EU ? Because after some time it could be deleted "Maskinoversættelse og/eller tvivlsomt indhold" "Denne side virker ikke som en encyklopædisk artikel". On this page you can see what was accepted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danish_withdrawal_from_the_European_Union. Wname1 (talk) 18:53, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

You should check some facts before you edit some articles. Blackpink have 44.1 Millions subscribers on YouTube platform.That’s the fact. Thanks for your edit but check some fact. Nomad852 (talk) 10:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No Nomad852 you should check some facts: I didn't update any stats. I only removed a distorted table by reverting the whole page back to the way it was 2 days ago with CORRECT layout (because the newer editions had to be discarded ASAP no matter how correct the numbers are). Someone who is updating the statistics is not allowed to botch up the layout and leave a misshapen, crooked, messed up items on the page to be viewed by millions: in this case the big table that had a some of its rows and columns malformed and mutilated — probably caused by a mistake during editing and failing to check after finishing the edit. You can go ahead and update the numbers but do it carefully. Don't leave a mess. --Loginnigol (talk) 11:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bad Samaritans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(pronounced "

rhino

")

Thanks for contributing. You might wish to familiarize yourself with

lead section of the article. / edg ☺ ☭ 18:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

thanks for the manual but in this case the pronunciation was EXPLICITLY chosen and derived from the world "rhino" (remember that there is no actual word spelled "rino" so there are no "real" spelling rules that need to be followed). In other words the acronym was itself deliberately chosen so that it could be spoken exactly like rhino (in order to make the animal a symbol that contrasts with the other animal that is traditionally the symbol (elephant). Do you want me to add source for all this? --Loginnigol (talk) 18:50, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a source, that would be great. Might be good to move to the Origins section. Also, it might be better like this:

    pronounced to sound like rhino

than linked. / edg ☺ ☭ 18:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the part as you suggested (put "pronounced to sound like" in it); and also added link to the source I already had. --Loginnigol (talk) 07:44, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Category:Assyrian-American tennis players has been nominated for merging

Category:Assyrian-American tennis players has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Assyrian-American tennis players has been nominated for deletion

Category:Assyrian-American tennis players has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Whitespace

Hi. Thanks for your additions to André Onana. Please don't add unnecessary whitespace. I've reverted your whitespace changes at André Onana. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:40, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Maintenance tags

Before adding maintenance tags, add an explanation on the talk page discussing the issue(s) you think are present in the article. Adding a vague comment within the tag is not sufficient, nor is it helpful for other editors who want to improve the article. See

WP:TC for more details. Yue🌙 03:00, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

Please have a look also at the information at this page, which appears every time you edit J. K. Rowling. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parthian Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Potentate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potentate prod

A dab page doesn't require that there be articles be about the subject. See

MOS:DABMENTION. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

DePRODing of Potentate

Howdy, I have removed your PROD tag on Potentate because the article already had an AfD in the past and as such is ineligible for PROD. Nothing's stopping you from taking it to

WP:AFD again though if you'd like. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]