User talk:Luca boscolo

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to h-index. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The link I added to h-index is not spam. It links to a very good software I designed for calculating the h-index and other parameters online. It sends the results by email in a cvs format. For more info please see this link. Also I'm not advertising my personal website, Via-academy is an organisation of Italian Scientists working abroad, it has around 400 members, which includes professors and researchers working for Universities around the world, but mainly in UK. This software has been tested by the Via-academy's members and it has been using by many Italian Academics in Italy. The results of this software are under rewiew by the ANVUR, the National Agency for the Evaluation of Italian Universities.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

September 2011

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on H-index. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Crusio (talk) 09:32, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Luca Boscolo 2011.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MJ94 (talk) 05:58, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MJ94 (talk) 06:43, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luca boscolo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Most Cited Universities for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 10:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luca boscolo,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Most Cited Universities should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most Cited Universities .

If you're new to the process,

Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 12:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Luca,

Please understand Wikipedia policies, including that Wikipedia is not the place for original thoughts or research

I hope that helps. Barney the barney barney (talk) 12:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly. You don't need to be affiliated to a university to submit papers. As a first step you would want to do a full literature search to see what other people have had ideas about, and to ensure your own ideas are novel. Maybe that will help you to develop your own ideas. Then find a suitable journal and submit it to them (see what journals similar papers were published in). For the structure of a paper see [1]. Not on Wikipedia though! Barney the barney barney (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thanks Luca boscolo (talk) 08:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Luca Boscolo 10 10 2010.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

I added all the citations from reliable and independent sources, could you please have a look at it and let me know whether it is ok? Thanks. Luca boscolo (talk) 10:08, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's

Referencing for beginners

. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Meets

WP:PROF

but needs additional supporting references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Paola Bonfante
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 11:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my article. I have removed the section === Personal Life === which had no citation, [where you wrote ^{[citation needed]}] and re submitted it. Please let me know whether it is ok now. Kind regards. Luca. Luca boscolo (talk) 08:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luca boscolo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 11:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paola Bonfante, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my article. Could you please let me know what I would need to do to remove the warning message "This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification..." on the top the article? Thanks. Luca. Luca boscolo (talk) 10:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Errr... add references to the unreferenced sections? Theroadislong (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paola Bonfante, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 11:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks. Luca boscolo (talk) 11:02, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added cites from reliable sources in every section and I removed the warning messages. I hope this is all ok, if not, please let me know where cites are needed. Thanks. Luca. Luca boscolo (talk) 12:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to

Gaetano Thiene, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not my first article. I wrote a similar article for another scientist and it was ok. I do not understand what is wrong with this one. Claudio Ronco is a Top Scientist in Italy, is a pioneer in his field, he wrote more than hundreds books which are currently used by students at the Universities as well as he published more than 1,700 papers. I wrote facts taken from his CV which are true. Also to prove that I added the citations. If you tell me exactly which part is wrong in your opinion, I will try to fix it, so I'm going to reinstate this page. Thanks. Luca boscolo (talk) 09:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you may have a

I added a COI section as required in this page and in the article page. Luca boscolo (talk) 09:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but your user page disclosure should go on your user page,

WP:CUTPASTE move to repost Arduino A Mangoni while circumventing AfC. I'm also concerned that you have created Paola Bonfante and Gaetano Thiene for pay as well, but have neglected to disclose the relationship. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@Rosguill: Thanks for your comment. I have added the COI section on my user page. Also, I have added Paola Bonfante and Gaetano Thiene. Luca boscolo (talk) 09:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill I did not know I had to go through WP:AFC. Should I recreate this page using WP:AFC? @Luca boscolo Luca boscolo (talk) 10:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've added an AfC template to the page, you should be set to continue work from there. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@

content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page.

I believe they should be removed. Ok, I received a very small amount to put this together from a CV, but it is only the truth supported by citations from reliable and independent sources while for the other, if not, could you tell me exactly where there are peacock words? If not, I believe it should be removed. Thanks for your patience. Luca boscolo (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply