User talk:LukWarUrs

Hi, and welcome. I've made a minor change to some of your station articles - taking out 'a' from in front of 'wheelchair accessible'. This makes better sense. Can I leave it to you to change the others? Thanks. Peridon (talk) 15:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no problem. I have another question, can you help me with creation of new pages - Toronto-Cochrane's railway stations? French version is much more better. Regards --LukWarUrs (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First a tip - it's best to reply on someone's own page unless they say there not to. That way the person you're talking to gets a message over the system to look at their talk page. I noticed the (top) had gone by the entry on my contribs page against your talk page. What's your problem? The French or the moving of the article over? Your stations look OK to me - possibly needing a bit more info if you can get it. Let me know what the problem is. I'm not guaranteeing to solve it, though. I do try. Peridon (talk) 20:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've found something odd. You list the next station after Matheson as Swastika. The French article has it as Englehart, which you have after Swastika. Can't both be right, unless French speaking trains don't stop at Swastika... Peridon (talk) 20:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peridon,at this moment I finished work with Cochrane-Toronto r-way. I mean that till today was only french version of this r-way and nothing more. Thank you for your opinnion and regards. --LukWarUrs (talk) 20:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you're a French speaker (Ici arrêtent les trains -> Here stop the...) I've done a little rework on Laforest railway station to make the English more English. If you don't like it, revert it. It's just a suggestion. Peridon (talk) 20:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peridon. You're wrong-surprise :). I'm polish. Your suggestions are important to me, because of my not native english. You are right and I'll change my version. Regards.--LukWarUrs (talk) 20:21, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No you're not - you're Polish. Very important distinction in that capital letter. (I'm assuming again - you might really be Mr Sheen...) Peridon (talk) 20:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Suggestion, this article needs to be expanded with more info and some surrounding Geo info.Thanks (Milestokilo (talk) 13:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for your suggestions, in this article the area which interested you was expanded, but I'll keep your advices to the next builded railway's articles.Regards --LukWarUrs (talk) 22:43, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, LukWarUrs. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LukWarUrs. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LukWarUrs. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Bo Takhro railway stationn has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 26 § Bo Takhro railway stationn until a consensus is reached. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails

WP:GNG

, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Parzniew railway station
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LukWarUrs! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Parzniew railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]