User talk:Magitroopa/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Compared to the, let’s say for example, SpongeBob SquarePants Season 12 page, the guide for The Patrick Star Show does not make any sense, the Season 12 page is listed in the correct order, while on the TPSS page, 1-3 are listed in the correct half hour format, while 107a and the 5th half hour of the show are listed by segment, which does not go along in the correct pattern, also production codes should be airing order as in SpongeBob, episodes are made individually in codes, instead of half-hours like The Simpsons, so according to Futon, or future DVD releases, the order should be like this as followed, and the production code sidebar should be removed, or listed as TBA for the time being until official sources confirmed production codes. Also look at the SpongeBob Season 4 page for example. http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch/patrick-star-show/listings/

the 2 and 3 episode boxes should be switched around, the last 2 segments in the wikipedia page should be combined as one episode, and the first segment of the 7th half hour should be combined with TBA, as the next segment of the 7th half hour has not been officially released yet.

Thank you for reading, Thenamebeing

WP:OSE. The episode table for The Patrick Star Show is indeed correct. Magitroopa (talk

) 18:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

I would respectfully disagree, production codes, in the sense that it’s used here, do not align with the numbers given to in the episode table, re:futon, it would equate to being an airing order that’s used there.

The production codes currently listed in the table are what is currently listed on The Futon Critic. Airdate order would be correct, and the 'production code' column allows readers to see that order if they so wish. Magitroopa (talk) 19:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

That would not make sense, Futon lists episodes as their Television Package Numbers (used on products like DVDs), not production numbers, also on the topic of boxes, it would feel as though listing individual segments, right after 3 half hours, seems a bit weird.

A similar issue was discussed at Talk:ICarly (2021 TV series)#The Futon Critic. If the episode includes a production code within the end credits, then we would use the production code provided there. Other networks/television shows do that, but AFAIK, Nickelodeon has not. Therefore, we use the production codes listed on The Futon Critic. Magitroopa (talk) 19:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Would it have not made sense to list it as TBA in prod code column? The user above you in the iCarly discussion made some very good points on the matter, others aswell, also could you talk about the matter at hand on formatting the episode guide for the series? Various storyboarders during OFFICIAL Nickelodeon streams sometimes releases production codes from there, or from actual people who work on the series, I think those would be valid sources on listing production codes, i’m not sure what else could as various other pages use crew sources, from websites like Discord or Twitter.

I understand why you showed me

) 18:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Where's the citation then? And remember, a primary source should at least have a secondary source to support it. You can't just say "The episode confirmed this arrangement, I've seen it", because someone will question or even dispute that. Unless someone releases the information (the program itself, or a news site that was given access to the information), you can't define the semi-finalists by what you have seen or heard. GUtt01 (talk) 18:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

It's becoming quite clear you don't understand how

primary source is at this point... Magitroopa (talk

) 18:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Actually, I think you might be the one not understanding this. Have you read the second rule of the policy for WP:PRIMARY: "Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation." I think you might be misinterpreting the reason for the removal - if its a primary source, you need a reliable secondary source to support that interpretation. I also read rule #3, and I don't have access to the primary source, so how can I interpret this? You NEED a secondary source for that information, otherwise the primary source alone is not enough. GUtt01 (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

And in WP:V - "Source material must have been published, the definition of which for our purposes is "made available to the public in some form"" GUtt01 (talk) 18:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

I got no issue with the information, but I like to be cautious and careful, and not jump the gun without some proof, especially for those who can't watch the program easily in another country. Even with WP:V and WP:PRIMARY. Even with the episode verifying this, its a primary source, and needs a secondary source to support it. That's why I'd rather wait to showcase SFs until the information is available from a secondary source. GUtt01 (talk) 19:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

For now, the cite episode will do, but we better find a secondary source soon to support it.GUtt01 (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

FOUND IT!!!! Will add citation now. Phew!! GUtt01 (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

And yet... that's not how it works at all. Someone's personal interpretation is different from just saying/reporting what was literally said. Nothing here is being interpreted. And just because you either don't have cable or don't have the network available itself, it does not mean we must conform to what only you have available. The episode has aired (and is available for viewing on the website), and therefore is

verifiable. Magitroopa (talk

) 19:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

I'm in the UK, and the episode link is not available here. GUtt01 (talk) 19:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

And as I said above... "And just because you either don't have cable or don't have the network available itself, it does not mean we must conform to what only you have available." What is currently only available for yourself does not automatically determine how everything is done around here. Your argument is essentially saying, "I didn't watch the episode myself, so because I can't check, the information is incorrect/needs to be removed." It's a similar situation with episode plots- if the episode has not aired yet, then yes, a secondary source would be needed. If the episode has aired, then the episode itself is a primary source. That's exactly why citations are not required for every episode of television series (especially outside of reality/competition shows). Magitroopa (talk) 19:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

And obviously can't be used as a source, but just so you can see for yourself... [1] Magitroopa (talk) 19:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

So your argument is this "Because an episode has aired, we can cite it as a primary source, and thus without needing a citation"? If its program focused on a fictional area (drama, sitcom, sci-fi, etc), yeah, I would accept that, but for non-fiction I would say that would not be true of itself. AGT is certainly in that category, and I would say that non-fictional programs may only do so to state what occurred in the program to a degree. But AGT is not just a non-fiction program, but a televised competition - if we accept your argument, we could say that a televised match that has just broadcast could be cited as a primary source to confirm a sports result without needing other sources, but that would raise serious questions amongst the wikipedia community. In addition, a primary source may only be effective as long as it can be accessed by many - so if a television network offers access to an episode for people who live outside the network's country, without restrictions, no issue; restrict it from being viewed by another country or even prohibit it, and that primary source is no longer accessible. Even if I wanted to watch it, if I can't access it, how can we rely on a primary source? Wikipedia may rely on primary sources, but it also relies more heavily on secondary sources to support a primary source's information, if only to make clear to readers that, even if they cannot access a primary source, others who can and either analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize, can confirm that information is accurate. Per

WP:SECONDARY

: "Policy: Wikipedia articles usually rely on material from reliable secondary sources."

While that YT clip can satisfy me for now about the primary source, it only just does it. It might be wisest to just to double-check WP:PRIMARY a bit, and its six policies. GUtt01 (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

The show is literally called America's Got Talent- we cannot/do not go around making sure every single person on this planet is able to verify a source on their own. Let's pretend that for whatever reason, Deadline Hollywood (using this as it is a widely-used source) is banned by Egypt's government (I just picked a random country). Just because that source is no longer available for usage/viewing by residents in Egypt, it does not mean we then need to start going around and removing/changing that source just because that one country doesn't have access to it anymore. Likewise, just because you are not available to view America's Got Talent in another country, it does not automatically mean that the episode itself is no longer a primary source/can't be used. Magitroopa (talk) 19:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

I'm not saying that if a primary source is not accessible, it can't be a primary source - I'm saying that if it can't be accessed by someone else, then we add in secondary sources that can support it; a primary source is confirmed, but if it is not accessible, a secondary source should be offered to ensure people know that the primary source's information is correct. That's why primary sources often get secondary sources: not to say, this proves it; but rather to say, we know it is true, but we have additional sources who have seen and analysed this, and can confirm it as such.

I would say there is a fine line between when a primary source for a television program is okay or whether it needs secondary sources to support it, and in the respect of televised competitions, that's something that I think might become debatable at some point. GUtt01 (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi - you reverted some edits at Oggy Oggy and one or two related pages, citing BANREVERT in your edit summary. Can you point me at the relevant banned accounts, there's been more disruption in this area today. Thanks Girth Summit _(blether) 12:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Never mind, I found the SPI. I've blocked and requested a CU to check for sleepers. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:52, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey, quick question mate - the AGT template: I just noticed that some articles of participants listed in it, some have that template within their article, others don't. Should it be included in those articles, or not? GUtt01 (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Magitroopa. I just want to ask you about something. I somewhat managed to find the possible correct air dates for the US on the YouTube site (that requires subscription), and find the episodes for Episodes 7-26 that have the air dates. However, I'm not sure if the episode: Le Race / Imperfect Attendance are correct.

Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/show/SCOE8ogmkRZ_nwc0TO9LVYEg?season=1&sbp=CgEx VictorRocks (talk) 19:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

I know you don't think that SpongeBob is the mascot of Nickelodeon, but Nickelodeon Movies used that Sponge on the Run logo thrice. The first is The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge on the Run, the second is PAW Patrol: The Movie and the third is The Loud House Movie. What if they keep using that logo? PickleAndPeanutFan (talk) 03:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Do you recall that IP editor who entered the discussion on AGT:S16 regarding a participant's name, and how it quickly spiralled into a heated discussion between them and us two? That individual has come back, and... I need to know what you think about their latest entry in that discussion -

) 23:19, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:ToughAsNails-logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading

- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:45, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your honesty and input to this Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#IP 137.27.65.235 - Behaviour issue. I understand we've had disagreements, and perhaps I may not have done good for your sake, but the recent dispute I'm in with that IP editor is gonna get worse. I felt an article connected to the dispute was the lightning rod, but I think nothing will change if I remain here - I don't think the IP is willing to engage with me to resolving our differences on the matter, so I've chosen to end my involvement as an editor on Wikipedia, and return to the ranks as a mere reader. Whether I come back or not, depends on how I feel, but I think it best I go and move on with my life. I left a little speech on my user page here, if you like to read it.

Thank you again for the honesty, and keep up the work on your editing. Best of luck for you in your editing work. GUtt01 (talk) 12:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Don't revert me. I was trying to resubmit it. This is a perfect article for submission, why won't you accept it!? Maxbmogs (talk) 00:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I'm so tired of writing a thing on Wikipedia and been reverted. Now Vivica A. Fox is a guy, as I can't put actress instead of actor? Oh my god you reverted you are engaged in an edit war, the world's going to finish tomorrow because you changed her gender. Why do you do that? Is actress incorrect? Since when?

@85.49.242.46: It would be very beneficial of you to actually try reading the edit summaries (such as this one...) Magitroopa (talk) 19:48, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

On the Jeopardy! page you removed the word concurrently for Ken Jennings and added back currently. As they are both hosting and concurrently is the word used for Bialik, why are you reverting this edit? Thank you, Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

@Lima Bean Farmer: I've just added it back. However, per the template instructions (regarding years being added to infobox) and talk page discussions (including Talk:Jeopardy!#Inclusion of Mike Richards in infobox & Talk:Jeopardy!#Jennings and Bialik, regarding those two being removed from the infobox), it is all correct as it currently is. Magitroopa (talk) 21:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for changing back. I read the others, just wanted to clarify about the concurrently wording. Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 21:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

	Vintage TV
	Thanks for your good contributions on tv and film-related articles. here's an old-time TV to make your day even better! Have a nice day. SomeWhatLife (talk) 23:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for catching this. I had used a fresh copy of the infobox (code) and forgot to remove that. Amaury • 22:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

When can we add the end date for Corn & Peg? There's a rule where if a TV show does not air a new episode for a year, we can add it. Rattatast (talk) 07:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello Magitroopa, I noticed that you reverted my edit on the Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go page. In regards to your comment, I wish to say that I did not edit the page because I “didn’t like” the idea of Britt Allcroft being creator. It is a matter of inaccurate information. Britt did not create the new series; she has never had any involvement in Thomas & Friends since she resigned after Season 7. However, her name has been listed as “creator” in Season 8-24 even with different writing teams and production companies, because it is a continuation of the same series. The initial plan for All Engines Go was for it to be a continuation as well: a 25th Season. But Mattel later confirmed this to be an entirely new show altogether - one that wasn’t created by Allcroft, but by Rick Suvalle. Her name is incorrectly listed in the credits, because it was initially going to be the credits for Season 25.

Here is a link to a Facebook post made by Allcroft, regarding the series. I don’t believe she would say there’s “nothing she can do” about a series that she apparently created. https://www.facebook.com/BrittAllcroft/posts/hello-everyone-and-happy-new-year-this-is-just-to-let-you-know-that-i-have-been-/3982412085126569/ Abraham Benno (talk) 14:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

@

WP:NOTRS

.

This also does not change the fact that we go by what the credits say- you and others do not work on the show and do not know what occurred behind-the-scenes. For all you know, they could've changed their minds again and had it be a continuation again. Either way, as shown in the credits, Allcroft is credited as creator, so it is correct to list. This is just like Kamp Koral: SpongeBob's Under Years and all the cries that Stephen Hillenburg wouldn't want it/isn't the creator- yet, he is credited as the creator, and he is listed as such here.

As for Rick Suvalle, he is listed in the end credits as 'developed by'. 'Developer' and 'creator' are two different things. Magitroopa (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Would you please stop reverting changes to the date format on Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go? The change is part of a larger cleanup project in the Television Project maintenance categories (see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Television#Maintenance_categories). The correct format for {{Start date}} and {{End date}} are {{Start date|YYYY|MM|DD}} and {{End date|YYYY|MM|DD}} (refer to the template specs here: Template:Start_date). TIA. ButlerBlog (talk) 18:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

@Butlerblog: A leading zero would certainly not be the cause of the issue (otherwise there would be MANY more articles with issues)...

...either way, I believe this is what you were looking for. The article is no longer listed in the 'Episode lists with unformatted air dates' category after that change is made. Magitroopa (talk) 18:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

As for A League of Their Own (Australian game show), upon a quick look-around, I would think changing ep. 10 to {{Start date|N/A}} would fix that up. Magitroopa (talk) 18:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Those were definitely it. Thanks for seeking those out - I appreciate it. I can adjust the regex being used in AutoWikiBrowser to scan for that. On the leading zero - you are correct - the maintenance category does not currently look at that. However, it is the leading zero format is the correct format for {{Start date}}, and AutoWikiBrowser looks to fix it as a general fix when the page comes through. The maintenance category not picking that up is a "for now" kind of thing - it may be something that gets addressed later when some of these larger cats are cleared. There are a lot of general cleanup fixes with AWB when the page is open, and that's one of them, so please consider not reverting. ButlerBlog (talk) 18:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, didn't know about

) 22:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Regarding MarioFan2021

You should probably go to

20:28, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Regarding BaldiBasicsFan

So, I am currently in a dispute with Baldi about Santiago of the Seas. He thinks that the "Pirate Play Along Adventure" special is the season finale, because "the first season has 20 episodes, so it automatically falls under that". I'm against that, as the second season isn't out yet, and the actual season finale aired yesterday, as of typing this. It is on the article's talk page, if you want to talk as well and hopefully put an end to this. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:47, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

• Did I already remind you that
  WP:WINARS? He can respond to this issue whenever he wants to, he my or may not be in this conflict. If he was, it may depend on his opinion, like we have different opinions. BaldiBasicsFan (talk
  ) 04:12, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Can you confirm if "Sand Storm" aired tonight or not? People kept removing the air date, which if it didn't air tonight, then now it's fine to. But I don't trust any of these other random editors who have started randomly showing up to articles we watch and copying our summaries. That is even more suspicious, but that's for another time. Thanks. Amaury • 07:47, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

I just feel that my edit could be needed or not and I thank you for it. Chidie345 (talk) 01:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

I've got myself in a pickle that none of us have noticed and that we're all defending.

Turns out someone changed the dates on List of VeggieTales videos from their original release date of 1993-1995ish to 1998-1999, and I and other users watching the page have been defending a wrong version all along... the page got so fucked up from the amount of IPs editing. I think we need a big rollback, and I've already went to RFPP and requested the page be semi'd for a good long time. Could use some help here. wizzito | say hello! 20:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

I know you erased the Wipeout results. Now undo what you did and bring them back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.131.96.173 (talk) 02:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

No. Magitroopa (talk) 02:48, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Wrong answer. Please rewrite the Wipeout results to people can enjoy them again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.131.96.173 (talk) 13:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Can I get the link for the Wipeout Canada episodes too, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.131.96.173 (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

The cast members for the rest of the characters are in the credits of some episodes. I have access to the broadcast network and NickJr.com. And if you go to this link: https://www.wcostream.com/anime/santiago-of-the-seas you'll find most of the episodes there and the cast members at the end credits. For example, if you go to to episodes 8 and 9, you'll find Escarlata in episode 8 and Enrique in episode 9. I'm trying my best to show proof about this. Do you have the broadcast network or access to NickJr.com? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MegaBradYT (talk • contribs) 23:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

I literally had sources on that page! Plus, it was disorganized, and you did this to me?! I was adding more to them, and you were like, "nope". I'm currently adding more sources to prove it, and you just did this to me. And I cited them too.

I'm new to the Wikipedia, and I'm not enjoying this very much because of you. You accused me for vandalism and unsourced stuff for no reason when I HAD the proof! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MegaBradYT (talk • contribs) 00:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

@MegaBradYT: Literally none of the warnings on your talk page accused you of vandalism whatsoever. Both the warnings was regarding sourcing.

Second, please follow the MOS (Manual of Style), including

MOS:TVSEASONYEAR

, as you have not been following in some edits.

Third, regarding

WP:RS, thank you. Magitroopa (talk

) 00:16, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Magitroopa. I just wanted to have the tables more organized. Plus, some of the airdates from Miss Spider's Sunny Patch Friends are incorrect. I have some proof from the archives and with a link https://web.archive.org/web/20050316030706/http://www.nickjr.com/home/tv_schedule.jhtml that shows you a Nick Jr. Playdate schedule from March 14-March 18, 2005, with new Miss Spider episodes. I just wanted to show the proof, but I guess that wasn't enough. I wasn't quite finished with adding ALL sources, so next time, I'll try to add all sources to some airdates to show proof and that are reliable. What sources are useful for the Wikipedia? And how are we going to organize the List of Miss Spider episodes with the correct airdates and in that order with its seasons too?

Also I had no idea about MOS and it's rules, that's because I'm new around here.

I think for now that once some episodes from Nick Jr. air, I'll only add the writers, directors, and storyboard artists of those episodes. That's the reason I came on here. I needed some edits up to 10 in order to get into semi-protected pages and add what I said, for example, the List of Bubble Guppies episodes because they don't have the writers, directors, and storyboard artists on season 6 episodes yet except Werewolves of Bubbledon. After a few more days, I should be able to earn it. But thanks for the tips! I really appreciate it for the newbie around here, lol :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by MegaBradYT (talk • contribs) 00:36, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I forget some stations air the game early and I didn't realize it had already happened. I see the article DID say that and I didn't even notice. Thanks for all your changes.

Could you check behind me on Julia Collins (Jeopardy! contestant)?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 00:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Well, this is embarrassing. I didn't hear him say it or Jennings didn't say it, but as soon as yesterday's episode began, I knew it had already happened.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:41, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Okay, now I don't feel so bad. The source I used keeps updating.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

The tables on the List of Miss Spider's Sunny Patch Friends episodes are a mess. Most of the episodes are shown more than once, some don't show at all, some have incorrect airdates, and I'm not sure if some are in the right seasons or not. Some people found the season 3 episodes from Amazon and IMDb, and both of those are considered unreliable. I haven't submitted what I did yet, but I'm using TV Guide and the archived Zap2it to find the sources that I found, and I can help fix the tables with them, but I'm not sure if some of them are reliable or not. How can we get the tables cleaned up with them going in airdate order and in the correct seasons? Thank you. MegaBradYT (talk) 00:07, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey, saw the report on AIV. I didn't know this was an LTA, lol! Here are some range calculations:

• 60.48.0.0/16 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial))
• 115.135.24.0/21 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial))
• 115.133.212.0/22 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial))

wizzito | say hello! 20:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

I just wanted to ask if you can help cleanup the article for We Baby Bears. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Is the draft ready to be moved into the article main space? If not, what needs to be done before making it an article? Cwater1 (talk) 02:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

• K. Annamalai page is hijacked again by some vandals users to change to another politician with same name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4072:6194:EC46:BBC9:1AD0:B6A5:9BE2 (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

They deserve to be seperated into 2 segments like The Fairly OddParents and Bunsen is a Beast! PickleAndPeanutFan (talk) 06:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

@

WP:OSE). Please stop changing this. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk

) 06:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Editing

I think it will confuse people if the term "Disqualified" is completely removed from the article as it does not count as a normal elimination. The wiki will not allow changes either so I believe that both articles for the season should be the same. UreasAlasonte787 (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

@

Talk:MasterChef (American season 11)#Regarding Tay Westberry's status. We/Wikipedia does not need to change anything based on how a fan-run Wiki (separate from Wikipedia) is run/operated. Continuing with your disruptive edits will likely lead to another block, so please stop. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk

) 20:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Would the same apply to previous contestants who were disqualified? or were they just instantly eliminated too? UreasAlasonte787 (talk) 20:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

I will leave Tay Westberry alone. UreasAlasonte787 (talk) 20:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your edits to

) 03:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Promised Land

So, I'm currently in an editing war with YoungForever, on Promised Land (2022 TV series). He's been reverting my cleanup edits (making the episode table in the edit source not look garbled, adding Futon Critic and Zap2it into the References, etc.), but he claims that "Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference". Which is BS, because I have cleaned up other TV articles with that formatting and no one complained. Can you please interject and help stop this edit war? BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Per

WP:CITEVAR, Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference, to make it match other articles, or without first seeking consensus for the change. BrickMaster02 was edit warring by changing the citation style to personal preference. The citation style has been established since the start of the article. — YoungForever^(talk)

01:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Good catch there. Oops! Amaury • 22:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello I was wondering how I can bring the season portion of the article up to par, and would the link to each episode on peacock be an acceptable source to revert its removal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJddog5 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I have declined your latest batch of rename requests since they did not meet the full requirements of

21:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

@Terasail: My apologies on that then- didn't realize it should also only be in regards to template usage as well. I believe it was my first time requesting file/image name changes and wanted to start off small- after the 3 from last night, thought it would be fine to continue. :P Either way, thank you for the clarification on that, and my apologies (again!). Magitroopa (talk) 21:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Its alright, I made the same mistake on first glance of the FNC afterall. Thanks, Terasail^[✉️] 21:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

I would like to ask request and try your best to clean up the page for Jellystone! A prime example of this is the Episodes section, as episodes are grouped into segments, instead of them being together. I don't know if this would be enough to warrant a cleanup, but this is simply a request. BrickMaster02 (talk) 18:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

I was removing details that I considered to be

17:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

@

MOS:CONFORMTITLE (specifically the fourth bullet point). Magitroopa (talk

) 18:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

All That disruption

Most of the All That editing is coming from the University of Scranton network at 134.198.0.0/16 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). Potential pblock needed? wizzito | say hello! 07:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

I was approached by an editor who asked on if the draft for A Loud House Christmas is ready to be submitted to be made as an article. I was wanting your opinion before I reply to the editor on my talk page. --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:24, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

I am just making sure to ask if we’re leaving the wording as is so as to not overcomplicate the situation so unnecessarily.--CreecregofLife (talk) 06:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

@CreecregofLife: What exactly do you mean? Is there something there that needs changing for some reason?... Magitroopa (talk) 06:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

I’m just thinking we don’t have to say it’s the linear premiere of the episode or that it may premiere the day before on P+, we can just leave it as new without going into too much detail. CreecregofLife (talk) 06:24, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

@

WP:CRYSTAL). Given the circumstances (that it's a P+ original with occasional airings on TV such as this one), saying that it's the linear premiere of the episode might be good to include... however at the moment, it's still a bit unclear exactly what episodes are the premiere episodes on P+ the day before, given the fact that the episode airing on TV would likely be one of the first two premiere episodes, but The Futon Critic

currently lists 201/202 for April 8, and that episode is listed as 205.

Just also remember that everything

doesn't need to be changed immediately- wording right now is probably fine for the moment, but it can be easily updated (if necessary) once the premiere episodes for April 8 are officially known, whether that be however many days prior to then, or if it's only known once the episodes are released on April 8. Magitroopa (talk

) 06:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

A new Field

Hello Magitroopa. I thought that putting a new field in the TV series infox could be more relevant, ie adding "Target audience". We would put that in order to specify the audience that the series mainly targets, is this a good plan? Rayan wind (talk) 09:55, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

This idea doesn’t make much sense, and is very narrowing CreecregofLife (talk) 04:15, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/CaptainHumf0187; possible block evasion? wizzito | say hello! 15:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

@Wizzito: Honestly, not entirely sure... seems to be the same as 86.128.56.162, HumfFan09, and BingHumfRoary, but none are (or have been) blocked. Based off of the edit summaries, maybe this is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Band1301, but I'm not thinking it's highly likely. Not even sure if a check for sleepers would be possible when it only has two accounts involved (1 master + 1 sock) and it's from a year ago (but if it is possible, I'm sure it wouldn't hurt...). Magitroopa (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm trying to make Wikipedia a better place, but you're reverting my edits for no good reason. Thomasfan1000 (talk) 02:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

@

manual of style on TV lead sections. Don't fret, new users often make mistakes when they start editing Wikipedia. wizzito | say hello!

02:43, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry about that. But on the Thomas the Tank Engine and Thomas & Friends (franchise) pages, I didn't do anything wrong. Thomasfan1000 (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes I'm doing a lot of editing on the Humf Page and he keeps reverting all my edits. CaptainHumf0187 (talk) 16:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

I thought this user, Special:Contributions/TheEditLover was the Bob the Builder reboot hoaxer at first, but this user seems to be different. My sock radar is going off. Does this sound familiar? Or am I going crazy? lol. wizzito | say hello! 20:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

@Wizzito: From very quickly looking at the log history of the category creations of the user (see here for example), seems very likely to be part of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EuanB2000, overlapping articles which does in fact include Bob the Builder. Magitroopa (talk) 20:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

lol of course wizzito | say hello! 20:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I was just curious why my edit was just removed. I was just adding an upcoming episode to the wiki. How is that nonsense? It is an actual episode, it was confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.20.167.144 (talk) 02:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi- do you have a source for this episode in question? Apologies for the 'nonsense' part, but it seemed quite similar to some of the other recent edits on the article from other IPs (such as this and this). Magitroopa (talk) 16:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

https://mobile.twitter.com/VincentWaller72/status/1511761143710183424 Proof that this is an actual episode 47.20.174.1 (talk) 20:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Per previous discussions on Wikipedia (including

not reliable sources. There is a verification method on these sites for a reason. And in this specific example, even if his account were verified, it still likely couldn't be used, as he says, "Not sure of the final title", meaning that "Patrick the Mailman" may not even be the title of the episode. Magitroopa (talk

) 21:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

) 09:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Reversion of my Canada's Got Talent Editing Changes on April 24th

I don't agree with your reversion of my editing changes to Canada's Got Talent. My changes clarified the timeline of events between the 2012 and 2022 seasons. I don't see anything wrong with what I wrote. Hikebladexcski (talk) 00:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

@

MOS:TVLEAD). I would say the entire article needs some more cleanup (as well as the two seasons articles), but I did see the grammar issue(s?) you mentioned in your edit summary that I managed to bring back... how is this? Magitroopa (talk

) 00:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

This last version of the introduction is better, since it mentions that the show was not renewed immediately after season one. I'm okay with it. Hikebladexcski (talk) 12:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

On May 1, I created some edits to the cast of Dora the Explorer. I added the names of the characters that guest voices (like John Leguizamo and Cheech Marin) as well as supporting cast members like Leslie Valdes and KJ Sanchez. In addition, I added additional guest stars such as Richard Kind, Hector Elizondo, and Rosie Perez who were special episodes. The unmentioned source was the IMDb page of the show. (https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0235917/) I believe these changes should be kept because they are more organized and they give more information to the readers. NDW023 (talk) 02:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

@

WP:RS may be of use/helpful to find a reliable source. Magitroopa (talk

) 04:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

So, I tried getting the page protected because people kept removing the end date for the show, even though it's been over a year and no official news about a renewal has been made. However, I got denied because the admin thought it was unsourced and disruptive. Please interject and end this once and for all. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

@BrickMaster02: Honestly, just from quickly checking the article/history, it doesn't seem like there's even been that much activity to warrant page protection for this- just a user or an IP here and there. It seems like the latest doing this is a rather new editor- you can direct them to Template:Infobox television/the instructions if needed. Also of note, checking the decline of page protection, the admin doesn't seem to say anything regarding it being disruptive, rather just unsourced. Even if that's the case, they might not be a regular TV editor here and might simply be unaware of what the template instructions say/the '1 year' thing. Hope this helps. Magitroopa (talk) 05:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

So, the official Disney General Entertainment Press website lists the production code for the second-to-last episode of the show as "317". However, BaldiBasicsFan reverted the change saying that "the press site is broken with the 307 code being repeated"…who cares?! If the official press site says it, then it is accurate. This has nothing to do with a production code for an older episode being repeated. Please put an end to this once and for all. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

• What do you mean that the press site is accurate? It is a reliable source, but is not correct all of the time. The site can be buggy in certain areas. This is why I have use The Futon Critic as the source of codes, similar to The Loud House. Also, you have a good history of being hated by others, per what I saw on your user page. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 15:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

  "You have a good history of being hated by others." Says the guy who keeps requesting me to do edits on pages I could care less about. Who cares if it's buggy? The episode was an hour long, but has a SINGLE production code. Also, of course you use Futon for The Loud House, because Nickelodeon doesn't list episodes on press sites. BrickMaster02 (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

This would be far more appropriate to discuss on the corresponding talk page... Magitroopa (talk) 16:40, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

So, I recently started a new section on the article's talk page. It came to my attention that there is an Adweek article surrounding the status of TV shows for the next television season, and Legends was listed as cancelled for The CW shows. However, none of The CW shows have been linked to their statuses, while the other networks have. Plus, no other media outlet (Deadline, Variety, etc.) has reported on it. I have no idea if the page should be updated with this information, so I wanted to ask an admin to give their thoughts on it. Thank you. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:45, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

I understand the minor edits for what you did, but Donna Castricone, Helen Kafatic, Anna Michaud, Dina Buteyn, and Jennie Monica have served as line producers. So shouldn't Joe Crowley be added since he's a line producer? Just asking, and it makes sense to just put in 2022 since Marc and Vincent just started. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MegaBradYT (talk • contribs) 02:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

@MegaBradYT: 1. The 'producers' list in the infobox should be for those credited simply as 'producer'- not 'line producer', 'co-producer', 'supervising producer', etc.

2. '2022' without the '-present' would be correct: it still is 2022, so including the '-present' does not make any sense unless they were to serve in the same role beyond 2022. Magitroopa (talk) 02:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

I understand the -present part, but if the producer list is only for producers and if the line producers I mentioned are on there, then why are they on there anyway? I know Dina and Jennie were producers, but Donna, Anna and Hannah never were MegaBradYT (talk) 02:47, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

I just added All That to 2020 in American television's Shows ended, but I wasn't sure whether to list it as Ended or Canceled. I put it as ended but thinking about it there's reason for it to go the other way so I'm seeking your input--CreecregofLife (talk) 06:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is IJBall’s passive aggressive comments and edit warring. Thank you. Amaury • 02:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

@

WP:ANI#Concerns about edits at NickRewind. *Sigh*. Seems like this repeated behavior will never lead to any sort of punishment(s). Magitroopa (talk

) 23:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

I had a hard time trying to get the credits of the second episode of that show. The episode is locked on the Nick Jr. website andI had a hard time accessing it. Can you please add the credits for me? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 12:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

@BaldiBasicsFan: I've just done this. Feel free to correct anything I've possibly done incorrectly, if at all. These should help you verify them- [2] [3] Magitroopa (talk) 13:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Users keep on reverting edits because they think Tumblr is reliable, but its not actually. Please I need the help from you because I can't stop the fight. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 22:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

So I recently tried cleaning up the episode list for Cake Boss, however, I gave up as I found it to be insanely difficult t fix. Grammatical errors, missing episodes and airdates, just to name a few. If you have plenty of time, I recommend cleaning this up. Thank you. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

I deleted the links from this article

) 02:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

So Averyfunkydude23 keeps removing "streaming television" from a lot of shows that aired on streaming services, like Paramount+. Doesn't give an explanation, nothing. Which is dumb, because they are CLEARLY made for the streaming service, NOT a linear TV channel. BrickMaster02 (talk) 17:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

It's because it's unecessary. Streaming television and linear television are both just television, so there is no need to specify for either. For some reason, you are specifically focused on certain Paramount+ show pages. If you are so confident that this is the right way to do things, why don't you try and add "streaming television", to the opening paragraphs of the Star Trek show pages. Or better yet, the Disney+ Star Wars and Marvel series pages. Mess around with those communities and see what will happen. Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 07:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Additionally tv shows can move from linear to streaming (Evil) and vice versa (Tuca and Bertie), for whatever reason. Simply using "television" is just much better. Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 07:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

I Know It's still the 25th Thehsl (talk) 21:57, 25 June 2022 (UTC) Well Not Anymore Thehsl (talk) 00:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Magitroopa

Thank you for creating

.

, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:07, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Magitroopa, do you how big a problem this editor is? I saw you warned them late last year about adding unsourced content. Well, I just caught them doing that at

) 17:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

@

WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU

, and due to this, previous block(s) have been lifted and it seems they will continue editing with this same behavior due to Wikipedia's mobile issues.

For further, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1090#User:Wilkja19, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive329#Block review: Wilkja19, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1054#Wilkja19 marking all edits as minor, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1096#Wilkja19, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1061#Editor refuses to communicate, adds unverifiable information, falsely marks all edits as minor, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1087#Wilkja19 once again (mobile communication, unsourced info), and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive330#User who has not communicated. Not sure if anything is possible at this point given those past discussions. Magitroopa (talk) 16:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for all of that. Outside of the March 2022

WP:ANI

filing might lead to something – as long as the focus stays on their perennial addition of unsourced content and lack of communication. Whatever the iOS issues are, I don't think they account for this behavior.

Anyway, I guess I'll keep half an eye out for this one. If they keep adding unsourced content, we should keep adding user warnings about it to their Talk page, to establish a record of the behavior. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:14, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Magitroopa, are you certain about this edit? I watched through the end credits from both Season 1 and Season 2 on YouTube and not only is Allcroft not listed as a creator, she's not mentioned in any capacity. All Engines Go is a completely separate series and I don't think Allcroft has any connection to it., She's been quite critical of it in the press. Best, 157.131.122.202 (talk) 22:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

She (as well as other credits, such as Suvalle as developer and the 'directed by/written by' for each episode) are listed in the opening credits, not the end credits. See here for example. Despite what she may say about not being involved with the series, we still go based on what the credits say. Magitroopa (talk) 00:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. I completely agree we should reflect what the credits say. It's great to see her credited in the opening - I had been looking in the wrong place! 157.131.122.202 (talk) 22:03, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Look, I am sorry if my edit warring is creating problems, but why are you making a big deal out of it? UpMentalSyndrome (talk) 18:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

I will stop reverting on that page, but can we please discuss this with a civil conversation?UpMentalSyndrome (talk) 19:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

The costumes have already been revealed including a duo. https://www.tvzoneuk.com/post/tmd-2022-costumerev Annamargarita0 (talk) 03:54, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

@

The Masked Dancer (British series 1). I can't right now, but maybe later today I can get to the series 2 article. Shouldn't be too hard/long though. Magitroopa (talk

) 13:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Just like Averyfunkydude23 has been doing, JDDJS is removing "streaming television" from shows that were announced for a streaming service, in this case Transformers: EarthSpark. Again, I reiterate that these shows are NOT airing as an original for a linear channel, ONLY for the streaming service. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@

WP:TV or my talk page. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done

) 23:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

He is not a random user, he is an admin. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:30, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

1. He is not an admin. 2. If you felt it needed admin action, there are many noticeboards you could have posted, but even then, they'll likely point out how you made no effort to make any direct contact with me. This is the last edit I'll make here, as like I said, this is an inappropriate place to do so, but if you want to discuss, my talk page and

WP:TV are both open. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done

) 23:37, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

And now, Cyberlink420 is doing it too. BrickMaster02 (talk) 03:30, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Agreed with JDDJS, this seriously feels like

WP:TV as JDDJS suggested. -- Cyberlink420 (talk

) 06:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

@

WP:TV and tagged BrickMaster02 in it, and they have yet to participate in the discussion, instead just continuing to canvass and edit war. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done

) 17:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

So yesterday, the third season of the Are You Afraid of the Dark? revival premiered. However, the first two episodes aired together as a two-hour premiere. Prime Video lists the episode as that, but Nick will be airing the first episode standalone tomorrow night. I'm not sure if we should either merge the two episodes, like with Danger Force's season finale and That Girl Lay Lay's season premiere, or leave it as is. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:05, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

I would not hesitate to ask for semi-protection again, if the same type of edits persist here. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

So I recently opened up a discussion at the talk page about the show's cancellation. I found a tweet from John D. Beck's verified Twitter, where he mentioned that the show was cancelled. The people who replied to the section agreed that it should be used to cite the cancellation, as it came from the verified account of the showrunner. Of course, I wanted to make sure if you agree with this, before anything else happens. BrickMaster02 (talk) 3:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

And now, there's a new discussion with a user saying that showrunners don't speak for the show. Please actually reply to this, Magitroopa, so we can finally put an end to this. BrickMaster02 (talk) 21:10, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

So, Amaury reverted my edits on the page, where the air dates for Episodes 18 and 19 have been pulled, and are not found on Zap2it. However, he reverted them saying that Futon Critic still lists them, even though they have previously been late updating episode listings. Magitroopa, please confirm that there are no new episodes for the show for the next two weeks. BrickMaster02 (talk) 13:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

I don't know what's going on with that person, but cleaning up a talk page by removing received warnings is just plain weird. I added your warnings back some hour ago, only for those to be removed. Just hope they don't do anything else that aren't constructive. WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 10:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm telling you right here just because it's strange behavior. I thought warnings were supposed to help, so I don't delete them, but okay... WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 10:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

@

WP:BLANKING. Magitroopa (talk

) 14:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

I saw the last sentence- I see. So it's just a person removing for whatever reason, but not against the rules. Didn't know that, so I might as well move on from this. WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 15:06, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Currently its a draft so plans might change in the future for it. What I want to note however is that this show is gonna air in the UK first, and since it is a UK co-production with Finland and Canada, please do NOT change the order to US broadcast order. It's against

) 22:12, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Dancing with the Stars (American season 31)

The article has just been semi-protected. That should cut down on the nonsense for a while. 😃 Bgsu98 (talk) 00:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Thanks- unfortunate but it was eventually probably going to have to get protected at some point due to the 'leaks' and IPs *needing* to add info regardless of any sources or not. Probably will be a recurring protection prior to each future season... Magitroopa (talk) 00:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

I’m sure it will be, but at least we get a two week break. 😂 Bgsu98 (talk) 00:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

That's fine to hide the table again; I was just updating it with the correct parameters to meet

requirements.

Why no Blue and Pink for the Contestants?

It looks unappealing in white Movieking134 (talk) 02:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

@

here for the Junior talk page discussion). Feedback is of course welcome, but I doubt a simple, "I don't like how it looks in white" won't do much regarding this. Magitroopa (talk

) 03:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

@Movieking134: Please use the article talk pages and ask about the table backgrounds. That's your best bet on getting feedback, not just from one person. WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 06:09, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

I have a concern about two of the tables on these pages. The cells for eliminated contestants on the first table (the cast table) is a sort of mauve color, but orange on the second table (the score table). I really feel like these should be the same color for consistency. What do you think? 🤔 Bgsu98 (talk) 00:19, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

I added her sons' names and birth dates and cited it.

Why did you delete it? Cats4Peace (talk) 05:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Can you please make the episode list more organized so it looks less messy? Plus, please readd the storyboard artists as their credited in the opening. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 02:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

• Nevermind. Someone else did it for me. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 16:14, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

I do apologise for asking for the article on series 2 of The Masked Dancer about a few times. I shan’t do it again. Benfskye1 (talk) 22:12, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

A user on there is being so rude to me. They reported me to admins instead of giving warnings even though with the Urusei Yatsura Japanese article, I was just cleaning stuff up, not vandalizing. Collaborations are here:

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/特別:投稿記録/おっふ BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 02:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

So, I'm gonna need you to help watch the page, as people have been disruptively editing it to say that the series premiered on the 28th, even though it actually was the 6th. And just recently, a user edited the episode list from production code order, instead of air date. BrickMaster02 (talk) 03:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

@BrickMaster02: Given that the two press releases ([4] and [5]) say that the series would premiere October 28 and the second press release says, "Additionally, a sneak peek at a full episode of Monster High will air on Nickelodeon immediately following Monster High The Movie."- I'd suggest doing similar to Cousins for Life, that the series first aired as a sneak peek on October 6, 2022, before officially premiering on October 28, 2022 (see this previous version of the article for what is done in the lead). The production section can then further elaborate that it aired as a sneak peek following the premiere of Monster High: The Movie. Magitroopa (talk) 05:37, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

I already did that. I took what was said on Warped!, that being it was promoted as a sneak peek, and added it to the article. Apparently, that's not enough for those editing it. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hamster and Gretel logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9DD0:8FD0:C0A5:DF8B:FED1:EAA7 (talk) 15:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Hey there, I'm sorry, I just wanted to let you know that I created a list of Mixels episodes in this page because I didn't know it's already

) 12:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

The Loud House (franchise) characters

Hello, I was wondering if we could propose

) 16:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Please update this article to compile with the current guidelines and other episode lists of modern Nickelodeon shows. I’m shocked that this has not been updated yet and it needs a great upgrade NOW! BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 02:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

It is with great regret that I did this, since like all the frontline admins I am appreciative of your patrol work, but all the same ... I blocked the IP you were reverting for the same amount of time, and certainly as a frequent reporter to ANEW you are aware enough of 3RR that no one would have to warn you.

In two hours today you reverted the IP four times. I know they were adding unsourced material, but per

you may only use that as a 3RR exemption when the unsourced material is related to a living person. In this case, it was the character list for a show. I don't think the fact that it includes the actors' names puts it under this exemption.

I would consider an unblock depending on your response to this (and would not object if another admin were to do the same). Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

So, a user named Coimenda has been causing disruptive editing, creating unnecessary redirect pages…even though they are not warranted because who would go to a redirect for an episode or character when the page isn't qualified for those yet? Can you please settle this issue? BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

The issue was already resolved by @Whpq at our talk, with Whpq having "reviewed the edits at the article and I see nothing that represents disruptive editing or vandalism". Coimenda (talk) 15:58, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

• Note - Nothing is resolved and there has been no real discussion. See my note here. -- Whpq (talk) 16:05, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

RJG!

Please add back the development section on the Ready Jet Go page. You can take out the Hey Arnold wiki citation. 24.224.108.40 (talk) 23:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Now that the article has protection, did you plan on working on it? I don't want to step on your toes. Schazjmd (talk) 17:20, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

@Schazjmd: I honestly know nothing much about the article topic other than that in its state, it was a total mess. Feel free to do whatever cleanup as needed! Magitroopa (talk) 05:34, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm still a little confused. I understand the channel launch in 2009, but according to

) 03:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

14 January 2023 edit war

hey @

talk

) 04:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Quirk of the AIV bot

Hi Magitropa, and thanks for your report here. It seems that the bot is not smart enough so see that you are reporting an additional IP, besides the one already on the board. So I went ahead and blocked the new one as well: 86.149.222.172. It seems like it may be necessary to report each IP separately if you don't want the additional complaints to be overlooked. EdJohnston (talk) 19:32, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

So, the article needs a major cleanup, especially with the episode guide. It features production codes that aren't sourced to any sources, and episodes with airdates but no titles. BrickMaster02 (talk) 18:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Before the report was removed, I took a look at 197.3.0.0/16 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)), and it looked like a good fit, so I have blocked it for three months (it had a previous one-month block). Daniel Case (talk) 21:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

So there is someone going around Wikipedia and removing awards for shows, stating that "they should only include the show and nothing else", which is a pretty bold claim IMO. This has been happening especially for shows nominated for the

) 21:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

@

WT:TV#Awards for individuals on show articles?. Feel free to join in on the discussion there, and/or see what others say. I really have no idea if there's any guidance on this anywhere, so this discussion may be of use. Magitroopa (talk

) 21:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Pining Amaury and IJBall as well. I remember one of them stating that should be the only the show should be there and not anything on the actors. This was the Danger Force or Henry Danger articles. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 22:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

If that's the case, then my apologies and you can go ahead. Though, I'd rather wait until they have a say in that. BrickMaster02 (talk) 22:04, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

I am gooing to wait at this point, I just looked at the 2007

icarly and the pages lists actors.Magical Golden Whip (talk

) 22:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Rugrats production codes

They came from Nickelodeon's site decades ago. How could they not be? 2600:6C50:23F:406E:E94D:1FC:63A2:A48D (talk) 08:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Hey magitroopa is there any way i can add the co productions to the Nickelodeon Animation Studio page? DaRealToonChance (talk) 00:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

@DaRealToonChance: Is there any reason you're asking me specifically and not at the talk page for the article?... Magitroopa (talk) 09:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

I would argue that a caption is relevant here, because it was the logo for the show for only two out of the three seasons. IOW, including the years the logo was used in the caption is relevant. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, a quick note to inform you that I have declined the speedy deletion nomination of

19:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert--I was reading TV listings wrong. Back in my hole! Robert K S (talk) 15:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)