User talk:Maninthewomb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome

Hello, Maninthewomb!
adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! DMCer 00:24, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Wound In Wall

I filled in the licensing information and fair-use rationale for your image here. You can use that as a guide for future album cover uploads, or to prevent your other images from being removed. I see you've already added it to the

see here.—DMCer 00:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

October 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:You Spin Me Round (Like a Record). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. serioushat 09:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC) A single comment in the Talk page does not constitute vandalism, it is just a comment in a Talk page. --Boosh (talk) 15:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Falsely licensed images

Inserting other people's work into Wikipedia without permission or attribution is unacceptable.

blocked. feydey (talk) 10:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia user Bababooey is management for Feeding Fingers and he has given me full permission to use this image. --Boosh (talk) 15:32, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Curfman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Curfman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hiding T 14:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wound in Wall

The article Wound in Wall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing
WP:NALBUM
, a couple of RS reviews but sources are largely dead and unverifiable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 13:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Baby Teeth (Feeding Fingers album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing
WP:NALBUM
, the sources that aren't 404 are blog reviews, not RSes

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 13:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Detach Me from My Head

The article Detach Me from My Head has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing
WP:NALBUM
, a couple of RS reviews but sources are largely dead and unverifiable. "Chart" claims are to one streaming station chart.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 13:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anything But Water

The article Anything But Water has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing
WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 13:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Album-cover-anythingbutwater.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Album-cover-babyteeth.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Album-cover-woundinwall.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Album-cover-detachme.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maninthewomb. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Josh One, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Josh One to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

KSFT (t|c) 22:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Curfman.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Justin Curfman. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]