User talk:Manoj Ranjan Yadav

The Wikipedia community has permitted discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here . Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 05:55, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Manoj Ranjan Yadav/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 08:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Manoj Ranjan Yadav, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 08:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the contents of your user page to User:Manoj Ranjan Yadav/Sandbox. You have already had warnings and explanations regarding your attempts to pursue a glorifying agenda relating to the Yadav and Yadava articles. Copying either of those to User:Manoj Ranjan Yadav and then twisting them to suit your agenda is not an acceptable practice. Nor were the additions you made to those articles today.

Feel free to play with the material in the sandbox, where it is not visible to the world at large. But please note

• Do not revert my clear-out of your user page, please. You've just done that and I have cleared it again. See
  WP:FAKEARTICLE. - Sitush (talk) 14:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Your recent editing history at Yadav shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

• You went through this POV stuff last October, got nowhere and were advised of the sanctions in place by SpacemanSpiff (see above). The changes you are trying to make involve
  ancient primary sources, are not acceptable, are misplaced, are in part unintelligible to English-language readers, and have been discussed to death at the article talk page. Sitush (talk) 14:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• You have just said at the Yadav article that you are unable to contact me "on talk". Why? You managed to speak with EdJohnston last October on their talk page, and there is nothing to stop you commenting here. - Sitush (talk) 15:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Yadav has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Yadav was changed by Manoj Ranjan Yadav (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864412 on 2018-02-09T14:59:11+00:00 .

Thank you.

For persistent disruptive editing at Yadav and Yadava, I have decided, in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the terms of this community discussion, to impose the following sanction on you:

you have been indefinitely banned from making any edits to caste-related pages.

This sanction has been logged at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction to the community at the

administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 15:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• And please don't add text in Hindi to articles in the English Wikipedia. Bishonen | talk 15:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen why don't you banned me from caste related pages... I was not against any religion or castes... I was only glorifying the great history of yadav.

Manoj Ranjan Yadav (talk) 11:18, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know the history of Yadavs? I will make you understand everything clearly regarding the subject matter of Yadavs.You are intelligent enough to talk to me. I will leave you behind regarding yadav history.... Swear Manoj Ranjan Yadav (talk) 11:20, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contact me on [email protected] Manoj Ranjan Yadav (talk) 11:21, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  regentspark (comment) 11:44, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lazy Maniik. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dibyasingha Deba, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Maniik ^{🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me.} 06:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JBW (talk) 09:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added only authentic one Manoj Ranjan Yadav (talk) 10:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.