User talk:MicroPowerpoint/Archive 3

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically

Hi MicroPowerpoint. Please be advised that

colon trick. If you need to show a particular layout of images as part of the discussion, you can use similar freely licensed or public domain images found on Wikimedia Commons (maybe there's something in c:Category:Image placeholders

) you can use just for general demonstration purposes.

Finally, just a general comment about what you seem to want to do with those images. I personally do see such a use would be justified per

WP:NFC#Meeting the contextual significance criterion. Non-free album covers are generally considered OK to use for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about the albums they represent. Non-free use in other articles is much harder to justify. -- Marchjuly (talk

) 00:48, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blank Banshee 0 cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:39, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet

WP:NMUSIC

and the yourEDM source looks like advertising.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slippy (DJ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

As a fellow Monstercat fan, I've made and edited the Au5 page but it has been rejected by various reasons - I have tried to clean up by adding adequate sources. I have made this Draft:Au5 based off the page before it was deleted and it would be a welcome if you could review it and suggest a few tips for improvement so Wikipedia will accept it. - User:LivinAWestLife

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk

The article

Hi! I know you love music and I was wondering if you might like to review the (brief) article for "Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song)"?--MagicatthemovieS MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but I cannot review your article. I am too inexperienced with reviewing articles and I would not be very much help. Micro (Talk) 23:07, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Ephixa. Thanks! Legacypac (talk

) 06:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article "Saving Light" has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GA review.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

The article Saving Light you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Saving Light for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 00:41, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Muzzy (DJ). Thanks! Legacypac (talk

) 06:00, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Strikerforce was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Non-notable musician. Strikerforce^Talk 18:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Muzzy (DJ)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Strikerforce^Talk 18:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, MicroPowerpoint! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! StrikerforceTalk 18:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, MicroPowerpoint. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Saving Light.
Message added 02:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

On 28 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Saving Light, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the song "Saving Light" was released as part of "Make Trance #1 Again", an initiative that encouraged fans to purchase the song on Beatport to support an anti-bullying charity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saving Light. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Saving Light), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Mate are you free soon to start on the Nova page? I can start a draft anytimeee, and I thought that you could work on the background (since you write them pretty well) and track listing section, while I work on the lead and critical reception section! aNode (discuss) 05:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@ANode: I've created a useable little template/start over in my sandbox. You can move it to a draft space, or work on it in my sandbox, whatever. What's next to improve the WiP is pretty much just gathering as many cool and good references as possible, getting the actual album length, etc. Micro (Talk) 06:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Brilliant! I'll move it over to draft space soon, will ping you there. aNode (discuss) 06:29, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for creating

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on the song "Flying Octopus".

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at

Ephixa

(August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Monstercat

. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ephixa. The name has been redirected to Monstercat. There is a strong burden of proof on the submitter to show that this performer has become more notable than when the article was deleted, and that performance has not been met.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Ephixa
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Barnstar award

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Great teamwork on Nova, which was well received by other editors! Hope we can go for further projects in the future. aNode (discuss) 16:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

I wanted to give this to you a while back, but forgotten bout it till today! Good job on Nova once again, I really enjoyed working with you. ;)) aNode (discuss) 16:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Source review for Saving Light FAC

Hi -- I don't know if you've been following the conversations at

WT:FAC, but one of the suggestions made there is to separate source reviews from FAC. I've proposed here

a workshop to try the idea out, and I'd like to get one or two FAC nominations on popular culture topics in the workshop. Would you be willing to put "Saving Light" in? It would lead to a source review, of (I expect) FAC quality, which I hope would be beneficial to the article; and it would help us see if the separation of source reviews could work for FAC.

I don't think I can fairly ask you this favour without offering to revisit my oppose at the FAC, so I'll promise to do that, regardless of whether you agree. I'd prefer to wait till a source review's been done, though, in case that causes changes to the prose. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:55, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

@Mike Christie: I'm not 100% sure about what you mean by "source review", but from what I can understand, it's about reviewing the references/sources in an article to see if it's FA worthy? If so, Saving Light should be all good for a "source review", the references there are all good, reliable and usable for a FAC and the formatting for the references (source date, author, all that jazz) should all be good. If not, then please clarify so i can understand, "source" is used for so many things and has a lot of meanings on Wikipedia. Micro (Talk) 01:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

For the workshop, the review would be based on (1c) and (2c) of the

featured article criteria: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate, and where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using either footnotes (<ref>Smith 2007, p. 1.</ref>) or Harvard referencing (Smith 2007, p. 1)—see citing sources

for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.

The most likely issue for a pop culture article such as "Saving Light" is that some of the sources may be questioned as not being sufficiently high quality. That's one reason why I'd like a pop culture article in the workshop, to see if it's a useful process for a non-academic topic. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

@Mike Christie: Yea, ok got it. I can see the issue you are attempting to resolve with the source review, most of Saving Light and most articles that I have created (such as Nova and Certain Kind of Magic) are most definitely notable enough to have an article about their respective subjects, but some editors get concerned about the legitimacy, notability and reliability with some, or even most sources/references used in the article, so you'd have to prove that every reference is good enough to be used, such as how I had to prove the reliability of the sources used in Saving Light for it to become a good article. You can use Saving Light as one of the FAC in the 'workshop', it should provide a good example. Micro (Talk) 11:29, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll put the page together later today, and will let you know when it's ready to look at. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:33, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blank Banshee Purity Boys.ogg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Muzzy (DJ)

has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Muzzy (DJ). Thanks! Legacypac (talk

) 21:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at

Muzzy (musician)

has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 17:25, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Requested templates#Pegboard Nerds navbox

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requested templates#Pegboard Nerds navbox. Seems like this relates to a subject you heavily edit. 99.203.31.12 (talk) 21:33, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation - Jd22292

You are suspected of

prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jd22292

. Thank you..

Nova (RL Grime album)

Hello, MicroPowerpoint. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Nova (RL Grime album) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Baffle gab1978 03:11, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Virtual Riot Chemistry EP Remixes Cover.jpeg

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk

) 01:00, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Girl Remixes Hellberg cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Girl Hellberg cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MicroPowerpoint. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello MicroPowerpoint, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Jalen D. Folf (talk) 20:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.