User talk:MouthlessBobcat

Hi, MouthlessBobcat. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see

Cheers,

I noticed your submission in

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also,

The article Artel Walker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As best I can tell from looking at the old deletion discussion, this is just a recreation of the article deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artel Jarod Walker.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artel Walker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artel Walker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 08:23, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to

Instead of blocking you account, I have prevented the page from being recreated again in mainspace. Please feel free to develop the article in your sandbox. When it is ready, please ask me to review it and I will move it back to mainspace for you. Please note however, that as it is a biography, it must be correctly and adequately sourced, and it must be completely written in your own words (not even close paraphrasing). --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed your article on Jeffrey Williams (fashion designer). While it may just scrape through on notability (that will be a Wikipedia community decision after it has been published ) , it's still a close paraphrasing of the website. You must try to write this in your own words because we have a very sophisticated bot that automatically compares all our articles with everything on the web, and runs the results through a duplication detector. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have just denied the AfC for the same reason. There was still copy/paste phrases, nor even close paraphrasing. When the article will be good and not infringing any copyright it will be accepted. --★ Pikks ★ ^MsG 16:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Bobcat. As Span says the article is a long way from

WP:GAN. AIRcorn (talk) 11:14, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

We need to talk... — Preceding unsigned comment added by SecretAgentMan0079 (talk • contribs) 07:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karen Dyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idlewild (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:08, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:09, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:10, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

]

May 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an

try to reach a consensus

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Whpq (talk) 10:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MouthlessBobcat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have done nothing wrong to be issued this block. I was told to stop editing and I did. I felt an injustice and spoke my mind on the user who kept reverting my edits. What goes on wiki users talk pages are just that. It has nothing to do with the normality of the website. MouthlessBobcat (talk) 10:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nonsense. Our talk pages are not exempt from policy; they are subject to the same standards for behavior as any other. Kuru (talk) 11:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(

edit warring, you may be blocked for longer the next time. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 10:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Racism in the LGBT community concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Racism in the LGBT community, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request

Userfication

of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

WP:REFUND/G13

. Thank you for your attention.

talk) 23:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Gary Levy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Levy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Levy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 22:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MouthlessBobcat/sandbox

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MouthlessBobcat/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

Userfication

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

WP:REFUND/G13

.

Thank you for your attention.

talk) 02:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Your article submission Racism in the LGBT community

Hello MouthlessBobcat. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Racism in the LGBT community.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Racism in the LGBT community}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.

talk) 01:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

Userfication

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

WP:REFUND/G13

.

Thank you for your attention.

talk) 01:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Karen Dyer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Dyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Dyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 16:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a rejected submission at
  section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion
  .)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Binksternet (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Fashion Show (U.S.)

Template:The Fashion Show (U.S.) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 11:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]