User talk:Musiclover46

Hello, Musiclover46! talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! FalconK (talk) 03:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply ] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the So Uncool page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Awaken (mixtape), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 14:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if your native language is not English and you have trouble understanding all of the warnings above, or you have some other problem with

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Brooke Valentine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 18:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GAB^gab 15:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you have repeatedly, on many occasions and across many articles, made changes to articles based on citations to iTunes and YouTube. Please understand that these are not considered

In this edit, you wrote the edit summary:

I can see the article notable.

All sorts of people have all sorts of different ideas about what is and isn't notable. Fortunately, here at Wikipedia, we don't have to rely on our own feelings or the feelings of others to decide what is notable; we have guidelines for such things. And for songs, the guidelines are spelled out at

Wikipedia's notability guideline for musicians and music). The fact that the article does not quote a single significant source for coverage of the song, or indicate that the song has made any of the significant song charts, means that it fails those notability guidelines, and therefore does not merit inclusion at Wikipedia. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Once again, you have restored the article content, with no explanation why. In order to avoid an edit war, I ask you to explain, here, on this talk page, why you think this song merits inclusion at Wikipedia, and why you believe that your version, with no reliable sources, should be allowed to remain, in contradiction with Wikipedia guidelines. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Awaken Reloaded. Sundayclose (talk) 19:31, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at So Uncool. Sundayclose (talk) 19:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Musiclover46 reported by User:GeneralizationsAreBad (Result: ). Thank you. GAB^gab 19:41, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:35, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Greatest (Keke Palmer song).jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Keke Palmer has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 19:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Keke Palmer - I Don't Belong to You (Remix).jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies -- I missed the fact that the image is used somewhere. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Littlest Pet Shop (2012 TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edit deliberately introduced a factual error. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 22:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Awaken (mixtape), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 02:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Keke Palmer discography. Sundayclose (talk) 02:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOCK. If you continue you will be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]