User talk:Nasirakram1440

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Hello Nasirakram1440, and
Welcome to Wikipedia!

Introduction
.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Nasirakram1440, good luck, and have fun.Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 13:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nasirakram1440, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Nasirakram1440! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

talk) 20:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

April 2014

Hello, I'm

Pashtun people may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page
.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • University Press.'' [http://books.google.com/books?id=S5sAdQq8b9wC&source=gbs_navlinks_s]), pg. 145. ''"Of the Pathans, there are above 6,000 families, chiefly settled in [[Nawada]], [[
  • <!--

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

talk) 11:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Warning icon Hello Nasirakram1440, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to

Tajik people has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission
from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be

talk) 08:27, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Other comments

Do not ever create attack pages on people - I doubt that you understood what you were doing, but I've deleted it. If you want administrators to do something (and we don't judge content so don't ask us to), go to

talk) 08:31, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Tajik people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's

talk) 10:47, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Please respond at

Information icon There is currently a discussion at

talk) 10:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Your recent edits

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts
. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The problem

Although there is a (not obvious) standard notice above which gets to the root of the issue I suspect you are still not clear what the real problem here is. Whether the book copied the website or vice versa is not the big problem here, nor is the reliability of the source. The problem here is that you have copied from the book (or website) almost word for word. The book (and the website) claims

WP:COPYPASTE. If you have any questions feel free to ask me. But please DO NOT re-add the material. You may not understand the issue yet but re-adding it is not the solution and doing so will lead to you being temporarily blocked to protect the encyclopedia until you do understand the issue. Dpmuk (talk) 13:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]