User talk:Neo139

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to use two, it really has to be carefully justified- the mere fact another cover exists doesn't mean you can use it. J Milburn (talk) 20:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including
  Igloo
  , some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant
  vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read
  Wikipedia:Rollback feature
  to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at
  Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{
  Rollback
  }} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote on my User page “When removing text, please specify a reason in the

Of course, such conventions are just normal business, but Wikipedia is not the place to create interest in attending them by adding to the Wikipages of celebrities, movies and television shows that the participants attended a prior year’s convention or will be attending it later this month, or that the movie was discussed at a prior year’s convention, or will be discussed this month at the convention, etc. Of course, every one of these edits includes a link to the convention’s page on Wikipedia, which page is nothing more than an ADVERTISEMENT on Wikipedia and a LINK TO THE WEBPAGE TO BUY TICKETS.

You wrote in your edit summary, reverting my edit on Lee Meriwether, "edit by 75.4.193.237 identified as vandalism to last revision by Yobot." My edit did was NOT vandalism. Further, in reading the page about Yobot, the word “vandalism” does not even appear. identifying vandalism is not listed as one of Yobot’s tasks. I would stop Yobot, but given that it was you, not Yobot, that erroneously believes that no edit summary for my edit exists, when ANYONE LOOKING CAN SEE THAT THERE IS AN EXPLANATION GIVEN IN THE EDIT SUMMARY, I do not see reason to blame a bot. Yobot did not write that there was no edit summary. Yobot did not write that my edit was vandalism. You wrote those words.75.4.193.237 (talk) 23:41, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Again,, I see and I think that guys are right, but, what about thousands of disco pages ? :D Most of them have this problem :( I will try to edit them... Thank you anyway ;) Nima1024 (talk) 09:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here to inform you that I did not do test edits to

Hey, thanks for edit. Actually I like this way that certifications be small, but if you check, most of discography pages are not like this and written in normal size. Anyway thanks, you just put "< small>" tag? Nima1024 (talk) 12:11, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--- EDIT: Yes, you are right. Thanks bro ;) Nima1024 (talk) 08:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--- EDIT: Hey mate, I think we should "unink" certifications on this page, what do you think? cause every table has linked to certification. Another point is we should add small "(sales thresholds)" under certificate with its link and other certificate words don't need it. I am waiting for your answer. Nima1024 (talk) 07:38, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I replied on my talk page but also wanted to suggest that you also talk to any of the following editors regarding discographies and/or promoting lists to featured, as they are all very experienced (if you don't know them already): User:Mister sparky, User:Lil-unique1, User:Legolas2186, User:JohnFromPinckney. Meanwhile I'll look it over too. - eo (talk) 21:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hey, thanks for asking :) but that was correct. the albums should not be linked again in the singles table. Mister sparky (talk) 15:34, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I noticed that you and User:Iknow23 have done extensive work on the Linkin Park discography page. Today another editor has switched some countries around without any discussion and wanted to call your attention to this. I was hoping that he would use the article's Talk Page to bring together a consensus on his desired changes, but he chose not to.[1] Perhaps you two could work with him to discuss the replacement of JPN with CAN? - eo (talk) 20:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome - glad to know my review was helpful. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 16:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've been wondering if we should replace the Italian singles chart with Switzerland (

When the article was in FLC process I was requested that the countries for charts should be the same across all the article. So I choose as preference albums charts to singles charts and Italy charted #1x3+#2 in albums. There is no consensus on this but if you see Switzerland charted good on albums replace ITA with CHE in all the article (Albums, EPs, Remixes, Singles,etc). Also the certifications should be only from countries in the chart list, so you will have to find the Swiss certs as well. Not sure if the effort is worth but if you want go ahead, you have my blessing lol--Neo139 (talk) 23:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The edit wasn't a person opinion. [2]. Just thought I'd let you know. JV Smithy (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove the deletion tag without addressing the concern. Another one based on a FUR has been added. We do not need three fair-use images and if they are used for decoration over critical commentary is also a concern.Cptnono (talk) 22:49, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make sure to address this tonight and give you the available options. I completely understand and am even supportive of the attack but want to make sure any such inclusion is inline with the standards here. Cptnono (talk) 23:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Figured I would do this before I had too many refreshing beverages.

Option 1 would be the OTRS process. That would involve the creator of the image sending an email to the OTRS team saying they release it. This sounds like too much effort and problematic since 1)Do you know who actually created it or was it just posted on an imageboard. 2)The file summary would say who the author is and I assume they wish to stay anonymous.

Option 2 would be creating a fair use rationale for each image. This would be very similar to the FUR used in the lead's image. The roadblock to this is that it needs to be for critical commentary instead of illustrating the overall topic of the article (media used to further explain something discussed in the article vs defining the topic essentially). So right now, a FUR could easily be created for File:Operation Payback GMlegal.png since the attack on Gallant Macmillan is already explained. File:Operation Payback.png would need sourced lines discussing the RIAA. At first I had three concerns with this. 1) overuse of FUR: I was under the impression that this was frowned upon but I am not finding a policy or guideline saying that so screw it. 2) We do not want to appear to be promotional. That is debatable with these instances. 3)Space. We do have space to put them both in the history section(where the lines they improve upon should be) so that is no longer an issue.

So basically, if the RIAA can receive sourced line(s) I would be happy to tinker with some FURs and see if it works.Cptnono (talk) 02:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As per your request, I've added a cite for the USCG = Dunlap and pals; the techdirt article flat out states it, and while the WHOIS records are quite blatant, they're not so easily cited. --moof (talk) 20:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Operation_Payback please

Neo139, you have declined my comments and I can see that you provide valid reasons to do so...what I need to know then is how do I add: "There are also some who see Anonymous as a secret government group used to promote a government political agenda, as in this case the new proposed "digital Patriot Act" legislation being introduced and championed by Palin & Lieberman."

Or something similar to that page... What do I need to do so the above line is approved... in my opinion, that information is critically important in better understanding this whole deal... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.18.102.164 (talk) 00:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

You should not have done that. Now all of the images will have to be deleted. Common sense will not allow it without an author ( "Anonymous" was not the author since an individual within an illy-defined group was) and the Twitter link is no longer verifiable. The FURs were good but these images do not meet the criteria to be in commons. Can you provide an archived version of the page to snd to the OTRS team?Cptnono (talk) 07:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The images were tagged for deletion but I think it was not because they failed to verify if Anonymous was the author, but because they contain logos, and other images (such as the Wikileaks logo, photo of Julian, Gene Simmons, etc) They used {{derivate}} tag. I have asked to the user that nominated them if removing that logos/photos is enough to keep the images on Commons. Thanks for telling me. I don't browse usually browse Commons. I will see what I can do. --Neo139 (talk) 08:23, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... didn't realize. I need to look into it more to see if the logos within the images are a problem. Unfortunately, if it isn't OK on commons it isn't OK here but it does work the opposite sine a FUR is allowed here. Any images without logos of other parties should be acceptable at Wikipedia with the FUR. If I can find a good fix for the others I will. Of course, a couple less images might be for the best.Cptnono (talk) 09:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was the photos of people (diff), and not the logos. I have just removed them. So we are no problem now ^^ --Neo139 (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In

Tranquilo. Un saludo. --

talk) 00:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Nessa Devil. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Using IAFD to verify her real name is improper since IAFD does not verify whether an alias (AKA) is the real name. Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:00, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Neo139. You have new messages at Morbidthoughts's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So are you actually serious?

I deleted a template saying that this article isnt notable enough and you are accusing me of vandalism?

Are you honestly serious? The attacking of websites by the anon group definately made it famous onto the mainstream news, including the attacking of mastercard.com and visa.com and they were going to attack PayPal too but they got scared and returned the money they owed to wikileaks, PayPal even ADMITTED this.

Instead of deleting the article I suggest merging it to Operation Payback, thats what a person with a brain would do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.160.92 (talk) 21:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:5th November Operation Payback.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to
   di-replaceable fair use disputed
   }}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• /subpage1 has Ricardo Fort. This one was a really short stub, I had to go back a ways to a version that had some real content.
• /subpage2 has Kohana. Have fun! - eo (talk) 19:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Neo139,

I just noticed you filled my talk page with a portal to various useful links on how to be part of the Wikipedia community. I appreciate the gesture, but can't help wondering: was one of my edit wrong in some way? I am just curious to know what prompted you to give me these hints.

Regards Olivier Diotte (talk) 06:45, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

None of your edits was wrong. In fact they were good :) I gave you this links so you can keep on with the good editing, learn more and edit more and better. There are lots of things to learn about editing. I have been here for a while and I still learn new things from time to time. Anyway, if you have any question just ask me ^^ --Neo139 (talk) 06:55, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, thanks. I agree there are a lot of things to keep in mind when editing on Wikipedia to ensure consensus. Thanks for your help. Regards, Olivier Diotte (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Grete Stern, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cedem.gov.ar/areas/cultura/arteargentino/05ingles/04biografias_en/stern_en.php.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Baseball Watcher 02:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Timneu22 has been moved to a new page, apparently it should not have been on the user's talk page, and the comments you made there removed to the talk page of the RFC. Please add any comments you with to make in appropriate form at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Timneu22. User:Fred Bauder Talk 03:22, 10 February 2011 (UTC) And how can you tell it is the real person anyone can add a userid on facebook also if facebook is reliable why isn't myspace Syxxpackid420 (talk) 12:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC) Ok that answers why facebook is a reliable source but why is myspace and youtube not reliable sources then Syxxpackid420 (talk) 13:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,

]

File source problem with File:The Beatles with Jimmy.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The Beatles with Jimmy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Virgin Steele, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made you Template:Virgin Steele -- go ahead and populate it from the albums category. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:14, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you overlooked this request, and the template nearly got deleted. In the end I did it for you. Happy New Year! – Fayenatic (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cannondiablo (talk • contribs) 12:19, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Neo139! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Thanks Neo! Invertzoo (talk) 19:10, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Information (Berlin album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Crawford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hey,,neo139 i just wanted to reply on your message that you sent it to me about LP'discography what you made is wrong and i wanted to fix it coz ...when you say that the album sold 9,637,000 that's right in 2000, but after that it sod more than 10,000,000 and it got the diamond certification from RIAA and that number reflect All the copies which has been sold in USA not just in 2000...so what i did it's not wrong...and i hope you will make it right (10,000,000) yours sincerely....

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  helpme
  }} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Full disclosure (mailing list)

The article Full disclosure (mailing list) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No

notability guidelines

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 07:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Neo139. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Article Feedback/Feedback response guidelines.
Message added 12:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relation of Kirchnerism with the press

Thanks for the innovative <!-- --> solution to the disputes at

Relation of Kirchnerism with the press. Would you please suggest an alternate title for this article? The current title makes it sound as if Kirchnerism and the press are some sort of cousins. Something like "Relationship between K and the p" might be better, but I'm unfamiliar with the situation and have probably overlooked a better title. Nyttend (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Conflict between Kirchnerism and independent media it is; thank you. Nyttend (talk) 19:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Re:

Sorry, I can´t. That article was deleted in DR and nothing has change since then. They´re not a formal political group and has no participation in any vote process. And "they will in 2013" is not enough (see es:WP:CRISTAL). When they participate and win some votes, it will be possible to review the situation of the article. Right now is not possible. And "exist in en:WP" is not a valid motivation as well (see es:WP:ESA). Bye. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:48, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that´s not possible neither. That´s the reason why I deleted Sageo's userpage. Also, it's very strange why you write an article in subuserpage of another user. Besides, you added 14000 bytes in one edit. That tells me that, or was an automatic translation (with Google or something) or the content was safe somewhere. Several of the source are the same PPL, wich is not independent of the subject are so are not valid sources. I can see it is an updated version of deleted one, with the same problems. For example, use this to justified their existence as political partie when that source only put them.... in the Table of Content, wich could be even considerated manipulation of the source. Funny is, english version was written by Mwalko, who wrote also the deleted es:version, wich has not edit since article was deleted, and only contributions are it, what makes me think in a

SPA. Bye. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

As I already explain, if they never took part on votes, and even worst, they never had a delegate anywere it is impossible to even think it notable. Referencies shows they "make noise", appearing here and there with different protest, but that doesn´t prove there're notables. Till they don´t have a real political presence, I don´t see chances of restore or rewrite article. If remains here, it's because rules are different, people didn´t check the article or nobody cares. Anyway, I see no reason to restore it, since lack of notability didn´t change, as I already explain. No votes are not something a couple of sources can change. Bye. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hand-coding

Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at okeyeswikimedia.org and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office ^connect. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for the compliment, I really appreciate it. The recent activity on the Todd La Torre page seems to have spawned some interest by other users even beyond me. I did ask a photographer to share some of his work (he did the same for Scott Rockenfield + 2 other pictures) but the other contributions from today came as a surprise even to me! Also, interesting to see two worlds coming together; you seem to be coming from the Crimson Glory side, and I'm at it from the Queensÿche side. Music unites! :-)

Also in return, thank you for welcoming the new members! Best wishes. --Eddyspeeder (talk) 20:46, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LP, again !!

OK here's the source for the 16M Here and it's very updated unlike the old one,,,

and for the 60M i tried to discuss it first and no one responded and the thing is that they're 50M even brfore releasing ATS and LT, and does the 50m includes the Live, Remix albums. so i see no reason to not add this numbers. hosam007 (talk) 19:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i don't know !! it just didn't sound logical to me. they're not changing at all. but it's OK. the only thing made me change it that no one responded and i won't change it again

thank you-- hosam007 (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i don't know what to say, for matrix's neo's sake !!!!!!! why you always remove my edits is there's something wrong ???? hosam007 (talk) 17:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i talk about LP discography and the NZ certifications and why they were removed by you !!! i searched the whole internet to find RS for the certifications and now you just remove them without any good reason !!!! hosam007 (talk) 14:23, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

it's right and reliable source and every main page use it such eminem disc. and coldplay too. it's singles certifications not albums. just leave it --hosam007 (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, i just was annoyed coz it wasted my work but now it's OK :)

regards-- hosam007 (talk) 18:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code that was emailed to you.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check
  applications page
  to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:11, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved and ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

• • Then go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
  • Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
  • Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
  • You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (Your account is now active for 1 year!).
• If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at [email protected] and, second, email QuestiaHelpcengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Questia email failure: Will resend codes

Sorry for the disruption but apparently the email bot failed. We'll resend the codes this week. (note: If you were notified directly that your email preferences were not enabled, you still need to contact Ocaasi). Cheers, User:Ocaasi 21:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Questia email success: Codes resent

Check your email. Enjoy! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 21:44, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in debate

Dear Neo139

Your recent posts suggest you might be interested by this ongoing argument.

Alfy32 (talk) 19:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Alexandra Larsson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexandra Larsson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Larsson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Technopat (talk) 18:57, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Neo139; I'm dropping you this note because you've used

the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Gnu Screen Screenshot.

Hi. I may be breaking rules by writing this here, but I can't find any other way to contact you.

It says that this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gnuscreen.png is the picture of your authorship. I would like to know how you managed to separate splits with one character wide whitespace. In my system, splits are shown seamlessly side by side, which is, on the one hand, good because it gives more space, but, on the other hand, confusing.

Please contact me via email (same login on gmail.com) or in this page right here, I'll come and check once in a while. Kindaro (talk) 16:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think its Caption option that your are looking for. But its strange because its the default option that you want. So if you don't have ~/.screenrc and have the default /etc/screenrc, it should be working (I'm using everything default with Screen version 4.00.03jw4 (FAU) 2-May-06 with Ubuntu 10.04.) Try asking at superuser, they are far more knowledgeable than me.--Neo139 (talk) 20:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greek video - translation

00:11 - 00:25: We are seeking for answers concerning the policy of the government at country's Ministry of Economy. We have arranged an interview with the Minister of Economy, Hernán Lorenzino. We have many questions on the economic model of Kirchner's government.

02:10 - 02:17: However, after we pose this question, the interview stops right away with the excuse of his being tired and he says has to go.

02:30 - 02:32: While the microphones are still on, he says...

02:49 - 03:00: A bit later, when we turn on the camera again, the minister's assistant explains which was the real reason why the interview was interrupted.

I hope this helps. Feel free to ask for help in case you need anything else -- Alien ^? 14:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Linkin park total sales need to be changed

hi the sales figures for linkin park are rather outdated. Hybrid theory has been at 24mn for the past 5 years; meteora and minutes to midnight have a reference source that dates back to 2008;A thousand suns has a ref dated 2010 which is a very short while after the album was released . I am a new to wikipedia so i kindly request you to find suitable up to date references and update the truth in the respective pages Nihalmhn (talk) 04:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beto Vázquez Infinity may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *Markus Prompt]] ([[Markus Prompt]])
• * [http://www.myspace.com/betovazquezinfinity Web Official de Beto Vazquez Infinity en MySpace)]

Thanks,

talk) 03:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Article Feedback Tool update

Hey Neo139. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the

Article Feedback Tool

in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just

drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 22:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings

Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list

. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the

WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of

The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Invite to Corruption in Argentina

Greetings Neo139, I noticed that you edit a lot of pages related to politics in Argentina. I spent the better part of the last two months creating the page for Corruption in Argentina, and I think it needs a fresh pair of eyes. Any chance you might be able to help? DaltonCastle (talk) 20:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Saw you did some work on the page. Thanks for the fresh look.DaltonCastle (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina logo.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Nessa Devil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nessa Devil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nessa Devil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Victimized criminal.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sicario criminal.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipedia Disambiguation fix program.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikipedia Disambiguation fix program.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Computer Security user status

Hello Neo139,

I would just like to inquire on your status on WikiProject Computer Security as the list of WikiProject Computer Security/Members is going to be improved to list active and inactive users.

This is update is being done according to a request for comments on the WikiProject Computer Security talk page. Be sure to state your status at the User status section in the WikiProject Computer Security talk page before the end of four weeks as this will state your status as inactive in the project if not done before then.

FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 21:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Neo139. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Newfoundland?

Somehow you added a Newfoundland tag to Nicolás Dujovne: you typed {{NF|1967||Dujovne, Nicolas}} where I'd have typed {{subst:L|1967||Dujovne, Nicolas}}. Obviously a typo, but I can't see what for: is there a shorter code you were aiming to use, which I might find useful? I'm intrigued! PamD 08:24, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Neo139. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Neo139. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Crimson-glory-logo.png

The file File:Crimson-glory-logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raza de Traidores for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raza de Traidores is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raza de Traidores until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ping}} me in replies) 09:30, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Raza de Traidores.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Orphaned non-free image File:Defiance-album-cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HistoryHelper Script (AD)

Just wanted to let you know about Wiki User script: User:Alexander Davronov/HistoryHelper. You can use it quickly copy diffs from history pages and paste them in talk ones improving your communication with other parties. Regards! --AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 15:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kippo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kippo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kippo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Loafiewa (talk) 03:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Category:Pizza restaurants from Buenos Aires has been nominated for renaming

Category:Pizza restaurants from Buenos Aires has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Beto Vázquez Infinity (album)

The article Beto Vázquez Infinity (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail

WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:47, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of El Cuartito

The article El Cuartito has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Orphaned for a decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 13:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pizzerias in Buenos Aires

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:51, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pizzerias in Argentina

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Of Wars in Osyrhia

The article Of Wars in Osyrhia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail

WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ecured logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ecured logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]