User talk:Nobberclog10

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Meath Intermediate Football Championship 2012 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Enfield, Trim, Longwood, Ballinlough and Clann na nGael

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing the new article

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Munster Senior League Senior Premier Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulster Senior League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:55, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Sourov0000. Nobberclog10, thanks for creating 2007 Meath Senior Football Championship!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article doesn't have any references as well as the article is orphan. Please help improving this article by adding reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.167.254.25 (talk) 18:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Nobberclog10, thanks for creating 2003 Meath Intermediate Football Championship!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 1

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2014 Meath Intermediate Football Championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kells

2014 Meath Senior Football Championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kells

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2009–10 All-Ireland Senior Club Football Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stradbally GAA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize Wikipedia. Thank you. --JustBerry (talk) 11:06, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2015 Leinster Senior Cup, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.potiori.com/2013_Leinster_Senior_Cup_(association_football).html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1996 Meath Senior Football Championship, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://dbpedia.org:8890/page/2000_Meath_Senior_Football_Championship.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1981 Meath Senior Football Championship, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://dbpedia.org:8890/page/2000_Meath_Senior_Football_Championship.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1981 Meath Senior Football Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Patrick's GAA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1982 Meath Senior Football Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Patrick's GAA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1983 Meath Senior Football Championship, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://dbpedia.org:8890/page/2000_Meath_Senior_Football_Championship.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1983 Meath Senior Football Championship

added a link pointing to St. Patrick's GAA

1996 Meath Intermediate Football Championship

added a link pointing to St. Patrick's GAA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1986 Meath Senior Football Championship, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.donehealth.com/1981-meath-senior-football-championship.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1986 Meath Senior Football Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Patrick's GAA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1987 Meath Senior Football Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Patrick's GAA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1984 Meath Senior Football Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Patrick's GAA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1985 Meath Senior Football Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Patrick's GAA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1990 Meath Senior Football Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mick Lyons. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Kerry Senior Football Championship, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Beaufort and Milltown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1995 Meath Senior Football Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tommy Dowd. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Cork Senior Football Championship, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CIT and UCC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nobberclog10. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 1979 Meath Intermediate Football Championship, Nobberclog10!

Wikipedia editor NorthBySouthBaranof just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work! Just could use some references.

To reply, leave a comment on NorthBySouthBaranof's talk page.

Learn more about

Thanks for creating 2017 Carlow Senior Football Championship, Nobberclog10!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about

Meatsgains (talk) 23:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nobberclog10. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating

Can you please add your sources to 2017 Armagh Senior Football Championship? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to the above? You have also continued to create unreferenced articles like

WP:BURDEN and WP:Communication is required. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 21:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Stop creating unreferenced articles and respond to the above. If you continue like this, I will initiate an

WP:ANI. Boleyn (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

I can see you are still editing - please respond. Boleyn (talk) 19:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your unreferenced articles have been moved to draftspace. They have not been deleted - this is to avoid them being deleted. When you have added sources, please re-submit them via

WP:AFC. If you continue to refuse to communicate, and just move them back, I have no alternative but to start an ANI whichis likely to lead to an indefinite block. You have been creating unreferenced articles for years and refusing to stop - it needs to stop now. Please talk instead od edit warring. [1] contains a list of all aritcles moved to draftspace to await referneces. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

You need to stop immediately and communicate. Boleyn (talk)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 21:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have moved 6 unverified articles (and counting!) since an ANI into your conduct was opened. Please take a breathe, stop, and communicate. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 22:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please let us know you're seeing this and explain why you're not communicating with other editors about the concerns they have with your editing. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Nobberclog10, thanks for creating 2018 Carlow Senior Football Championship!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 18:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Nobberclog10, thanks for creating 2018 Kerry Senior Football Championship!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 19:00, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to the above? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:08, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nobberclog, I enjoy reviewing your creations and appreciate you taking the time to write so many. However, it is essential that they have references and that you communicate.

WP:ANI and another block. Please just respond to the messages people have taken the time to send you. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 12:45, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Nobberclog10. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:33, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  (Swarm ♠ talk) 20:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nobberclog10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear User:Dlohcierekim, Thanks for your reply, however I fail to comprehend why you say Wikipedia has no interest in keeping fans up to date. Whether you're a fan of sport, science, music, television or arts, Wikipedia is a means of keeping fans up to date and broadening their horizons. If my pages were deleted like this back in January as User:Boleyn has alluded to, why is it that other Wikipedia pages keeping sports fans up to date haven't been deleted? I have received many private messages of thanks from Irish people not only at home but also worldwide for my work on Wikipedia, and I dread to see this come to an end and let these thousands of people down who have been forced to emigrate from our shores due to unemployment etc. My work provides them with an opportunity to feel reconnected with their home and in a way make their time abroad more bearable perhaps. Many elderly people also look back on my articles regarding football in the 1950's and 60's for example and reminisce with fondness of bygone days where they partook in such popular games. In the last 6 months

WP:AfC

. Now before you lambaste me by calling me uneducated, I'd like to express how difficult I feel it is to comprehend instructions on Wikipedia and I highly doubt that every single person who's ever edited on Wikipedia would think otherwise!. One recommendation I would like to make is that Wikipedia should include tutorials for first time editors instead of just written instruction which is expressed in quite advanced English more often than not! Maybe a tutorial or induction on how to use a Userpage correctly should be considered? I hope we can work this out and make Wikipedia a more efficient and safer place to edit for the enjoyment of admins, editors and readers alike. Regards.

Decline reason:

We

have

such tutorials, but you're missing the point here. When someone told you that there's a problem with your edits and you didn't understand them, you should have asked for clarification instead of just continuing what you've been doing before. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and interacting with other editors is not optional here. Anyway, let's discuss how we can work towards getting you unblocked. I propose that:

• You familiarize yourself with referencing on Wikipedia. Pretty sure that you've been already given enough relevant links, but if not or you don't understand something, feel free to get help with {{help me}}.
• You make yourself a promise to always provide a source for what you're writing. It's not rocket science: you had to have information about what you're writing about, right? Then it shouldn't be too hard to add where you got that information with a couple clicks, RefToolbar or VisualEditor work wonders.
• Once you're ready, you make another request explaining what you've learned and we unblock you.

How does that sound? Max Semenik (talk) 22:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• That sounds great Max Semenik I understand where you're coming from. I'll take time to look at the links you've provided. Thanks. Nobberclog10 (talk) 21:24, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nobberclog10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Having spent weeks looking over my previous publications I completely understand the reasons for which I have been blocked, although I’d like to express that any mistakes I’ve made were in good faith and no vandalism was intended whatsoever. Obviously it’s important to reference articles in order to make sure that information and content published is known to be a reliable resource for readers, however in relation to my own articles I’d like to ask for assistance with the following. Many of my previous Wikipedia publications provide information from a compilation local newspapers first published over 100 years ago in some cases. Because of this there are no direct hyperlinks to these newspaper articles. Is it acceptable for editors in Wikipedia to reference where information came from even though no direct hyperlink is available? Now there may be some areas of these previous publications that I can provide hyperlinks to which can validate my content but due to the vintage of these newspaper articles it may prove difficult! Another thing I’ve learned is that through the {{help me}} template I can contact other Wikipedia admins or editors should I have any queries or worries about any of my future publications, which is great as I won’t feel as isolated as before. In future should I be contacted by any I admins I realise that I should work with them in order to solve any issues and follow the Wikipedia community customs. As I’ve previously stated, I’m extremely passionate about what I can bring to the Wikipedia community and I feel that my publications provide a service to many GAA fans and the entire Irish diaspora worldwide. Regards, Nobberclog10 (talk)

Decline reason:

Why are you asking questions about newspapers published over 100 years ago? This information is clearly available in the policies and guidelines you should have already read. Therefore, I'm declining this unblock on

WP:CIR grounds. Yamla (talk) 12:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nobberclog10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear

WP:CITEHOW in relation to newspapers, books, journal articles and webpages. If you require examples to be submitted I can comply with this. I understand that admins have a responsibility to ensure the competency of editors and ensure that content on Wikipedia is reliable. I was just seeking clarification as I feel that I'm much more prepared to contribute now to the Wikipedia community. Regards, Nobberclog10 (talk) 19:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 14:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nobberclog10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Swarm, I see I have been blocked for disruptive editing however I fail to see why. My edits mainly revolve around the ongoing Gaelic Football club championships in Ireland. This is the most popular sport in Ireland and now that i have been blocked, many football fans in Ireland will have no means of keeping up to date with the results of their favourite passtime. My edits may seem 'disruptive' as pages need to be constantly updated. I retreive all information for my pages from a number of trusted Gaelic football websites and local Irish media outlets. Many people will be left without a means of following Gaelic football in each county should this block continue. I urge you to revise your decision. Yours faithfully, Nobberclog10

Decline reason:

Wikipedia has no interest in keeping fans up to date. You might want to create a blog somewhere for that. As you have no comprehension of how you have disrupted Wikipedia, no understanding of

WP:BRD, no idea of how to source content reliably, I've no recourse but to decline your request. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Also, you were already blocked for refusing to communicate and spamming unreferenced articles after
  WP:CIR in your block log. (Swarm ♠ talk) 23:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hello, Nobberclog10. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 08:11, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nobberclog10. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 08:11, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nobberclog10. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:38, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nobberclog10. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 09:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nobberclog10. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Drogheda United F.C. season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Drogheda United F.C. season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 17:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]