User talk:OTim75

The same duplicated image of Elvis has been added to

Correction has been made to the Rock and roll article, it's nothing to worry about. And I'm not editing with those usernames. OTim75 (talk) 15:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Regarding your WPWP contributions: please avoid using thumbnails when adding images to infoboxes. For example, in this edit, instead of doing [[file:Kaplica wieś Sprzęcice rn.jpg|thumb|Sprzęcice.]], you would write File:Kaplica wieś Sprzęcice rn.jpg. The image caption would then go in the image_caption field. You can use the "show preview" button to preview your edit and make sure it is formatted correctly before saving. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 07:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, OTim75! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 00:34, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seyi Awonuga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seyi Awonuga, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

talk) 16:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, OTim75! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the talk) 16:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission does not appear to be written in

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seyi Awonuga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seyi Awonuga, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ishola Adebayo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ishola Adebayo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 22:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OTim75 (talk) 11:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Alright. Thank you[reply]

A large number of

#wpwp #wpwpkwr are the hashtag used in my local wikipedia community to track my contribution in the on going wiki pages wanting photos campaign, not a script. OTim75 (talk) 08:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is your "local wikipedia community"? You should link these things, particularly the "pages wanting photos campaign" that you refer to. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:07, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The hashtags is a requirement for my edit to count. thanks for your understanding. OTim75 (talk) 09:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OTim, whatever your motivation, your resulting editorial work is clearly resulting in quantity over quality. In several instances, I see you have added images of the author in literature-related articles in the infobox. This is not a good choice; an image of the work is preferred. In several other instances, I see you have added an image of the author with a caption implying the person is the work of writing, which is also not a good choice. I also note that your edits rarely included proper formatting of titles like italics or quotations marks. I certainly appreciate your efforts but, please, consider slowing down and being more conscientious about your edits. --Midnightdreary (talk) 18:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for calling my attention to all of that. I will be contious of it all, going forward. OTim75 (talk) 19:03, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You say The hashtags is a requirement for my edit to count. thanks for your understanding. - but I don't understand. What is it that you are counting? You have not linked any page relating to what you have been doing. Please also note that the

WP:TPG. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

RedRose, I believe he is referring to this project. --Midnightdreary (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and this meta:Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos 2021 Contest at Kwara — Preceding unsigned comment added by OTim75 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On meta:Wikipedia_Pages_Wanting_Photos_2021, it says that you have to put the hashtags in your edits for them to be counted for the prize, giving the example here etc. I think this is an issue that ought to be taken up at Meta, not with the individual editor... jp×g 00:12, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: I did, once a link had actually been provided for me to follow: see meta:Talk:Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos#Cryptic edit summaries. Nobody has responded there yet. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In Uganda Railway, which is about a British colonial railway that ceased in 1926, you added a 2006 photo of a modern locomotive. Please be more careful. MB 17:39, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I wil be more careful going forward. Thanks.OTim75 (talk) 09:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it looks like you accidentally added an image of the Harmersbach Valley Railway to the IND Crosstown Line page. I removed this image, and just wanted to let you know in case you had another image you intended to upload instead of that one. Azoubee (talk) 14:48, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To add on to this, please be more careful when adding images, especially if you're making these additions as part of the Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos contest. Besides the Crosstown Line image, I noticed there's a section on Uganda Railway immediately above where someone else told you to be careful. Here, you added a red linked image in the infobox when you intended to add File:50th Street IRT Broadway 7th Avenue Line 0919.JPG (in fact, the string 50th Street IRT Broadway 7th Avenue Line 0919.JPG appears three times). Please at least use the preview button if you're going to add images at this rate of speed; otherwise, such mistakes are bound to happen. Epicgenius (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I wil be more careful going forward. Thank you. OTim75 (talk) 21:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello OTim75! Your additions to

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images.
  non-free content criteria
  in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for calling my attention to this. OTim75 (talk) 21:57, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While I commend you for your edits as part of the WPWP project, I don't think just the mall's logo counts as a good image (as you've added to several Westfield-owned malls). Additionally, please note that WPWP requires high quality captions, not just restating the name of the mall. Pokemonprime (talk) 13:39, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, well noted.OTim75 (talk) 21:52, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nana Otedola. Thanks! Princess of Ara 09:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nana Otedola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nana Otedola, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 13:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, OTim75. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission appears to

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kinsleaf Global and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 21:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission appears to

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article

. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kinsleaf Global and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 04:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.