User talk:Oloriebi234

Hi Oloriebi234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at talk ). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A press release is not an

reliable source

- repeated three times is worth even less

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juliette Schlegl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Juliette Schlegl, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:18, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply you mean, press release aren't accepted here, or it shouldn't be more than one, think limiting the press release to one and adding another independent variable link to it, does it stand any chance or it should be up for deletion Oloriebi 23:48, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Submission likely to get rejected if resubmitted without making improvements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juliette Schlegl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Juliette Schlegl, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 18:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oloriebi234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I noticed I was blocked for self advertising Firstly I never write article about my self, nor paid to edit, I found a new passion in editing Wikipedia, maybe the reviewer thinks about Ekiti United article is paid editing? I actually found it in the list of requested articles under African football task, and also found out that it has previously deleted. So I request to be for it to be undeleted so the admin told me, it's never been created. Next, is not following notablity guidelines, I've created atleast three or four articles and they were reviewed by an administrator, which means it's notable enough to remain on Wikipedia, so I don't really think I violate notablity guidelines otherwise I should be clear about it. All my references have previously used on Wikipedia, I've read the guidelines carefully. Thanks Oloriebi 19:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:30, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• @MER-C: could I have a bit more detail on which particular edits appear to be covert advertising, I'm struggling to review this unblock without a clearer awareness of exactly what was problematic. Listing notability as a blocking reason without any prior warning (i'm aware they were getting AfC declines, but no actual messages as far as I can tell) also seems somewhat unusual Nosebagbear (talk) 11:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draft:Candy Marx and Draft:Juliette Schlegl. This is UPE, I can explain why offline. MER-C 11:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've never edit in return for money, maybe you should prove me wrong, firstly Candy Marx is page is the first ever page I created, and it's approved. Secondly the second article is the one I bumped into in one of the task force, so I tried to edit it, and it was rejected twice, since I can't find any reference to it I asked it to be deleted. Please I need more clarity Oloriebi 13:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why were you interested sufficiently in these people to write an article on them? Where did you hear about them? MER-C 18:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, firstly Candy Marx is a popular Australian Vegan, I firstly had about her from my friend before I later saw her on a TV show. I never know her personally (how can I even bumped into her) so I became a vegan.

The other one I don't know her honestly, I think I was strolling in a task force looking for what to edit, then I bumped into the draft, I tried to edit by searching the internet for reference, but they weren't sufficient, it was declined by a reviewing editor so I requested it to be deleted which was deleted by an admin. Since then I've made two articles Stanley Nwabili and Ekiti United, then some minor edits.

I've never been paid for editing, am not an admin why will I get paid. Oloriebi 19:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get a response? Oloriebi 21:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, I still don't understand why I'm blocked, did anyone told you they pay me to edit? If the person have evidence he can go ahead to disclose it, if genuine. No one pay me to edit, Candy Marx is a vegan in Australia check the internet, her information it's all over there, as for Julie I saw the draft and then I decided to expand it. I searched the internet and add reference to it then I submit it for a review which was rejected, when I found out their is no reference to it, I decided to delete it. But I noticed you never respond to my answers, maybe you didn't have time, that's why I'm writing to you here.

And if you think the article doesn't meet Wikipedia standard you can delete it.

Have a nice day ahead.

Have a great day ahead. Thanks Oloriebi 09:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Oloriebi234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think I understand what I did wrong, by writing articles about someone I close to and from a fan point of view, I've reviewed all my previous edits and some experienced editors edits now I fully understand my mistakes. I think the block is no longer valid, I promise to abide to all wiki rules Oloriebi 13:33, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I'm

assuming good faith and unblocking. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:06, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Iflaq were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Soccerhub Radio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Soccerhub Radio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_signed,

^(talk) 15:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Soccerhub Radio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Soccerhub Radio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 23:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Thank you for creating Alhameen Adeniyi Adegbite.

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are

WP:SOURCES

... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're specially invited to join the Federal Medical Centres, University Teaching Hospitals and Federal Specialty Hospitals in Nigeria Contest from 25 May 2022 to 25 June 2022.

Federal Medical Centres, University Teaching Hospitals and Federal Specialty Hospitals are Federal government of Nigeria owned hospitals controlled by the Federal Ministry of Health. There are a total of 22 Federal Medical Centres, 20 University Teaching Hospitals and 13 Federal Specialty Hospitals in Nigeria, but articles about these hospitals are missing on Wikipedia and this project will seek to create these articles on the English Wikipedia.

Sign up for this contest by listing your username under the participants section.

Souvenirs will be awarded to participants at the end of the contest

For more information concerning the contest and how to fully participate, visit the contest page by clicking here.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Thank you for creating Alhameen Adeniyi Adegbite.

Please try to keep grammar and spelling clear. Otherwise, well done.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AirshipJungleman29}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Oloriebi234. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]