User talk:Ozdarka

]

Orphaned non-free image File:WWE Intercontinental Championship belt 2014.png

Thanks for uploading

]

List of PlayStation 3 games

Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yooka-Laylee artwork.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. –Totie (talk) 08:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ozdarka. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not reapply a CSD A10 that has been contested as invalid, as you did here. CSD is not for discussions, and editors who contest the tag are allowed to remove it. An admin may delete a page tagged with CSD, if it meets the criteria, at any time, despite any discussion occurring at project pages about the topic. Additionally, the A10 criteria states If the title of the page is a plausible redirect to an existing page, it is not eligible for speedy deletion, and should be redirected instead. This is a plausible redirect to Nintendo Switch (In fact, it was previously BOLDLY redirected, but that was contested too), so A10 does not apply.

If you believe the article should be deleted, following a discussion, the proper venue is

I didn't vandalize the article, get your facts straight by reading the Aftershock collection, that Batman used a non-lethal fetid compound to disperse riots with his Humvee. I won't re-add it, but just to let you know the next time you accusing someone vandalizing an article. It is very offensive for the accusation.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 08:14, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ozdarka. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ozdarka. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If IGC is a widely recognized initialism for Instant Game Store, then it should be introduced in the article. And if it's on the IGC disambiguation page, then it should be used in the linked article. PlayStation Network (nor List of Instant Game Collection games (North America), for that matter) does not mention 'IGC'. Leschnei (talk) 17:31, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No I knew. I suppose it's fine as is. It explains thoroughly enough somewhere else that he ain’t a central character on that game which is what I was trying to convey. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 14:08, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Super Mario you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 14:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ozdarka, I reverted your addition to

Instead of condescending, next time check content before you revert the change. A reliable source was provided in which the names are combined into the word. Ozdarka (talk) 06:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you ignored where I wrote "If you can cite a reliable source (

WP:RS) that discusses how the two characters' names can be combined, that would be legitimate addition." You cited a video game as a source. All that says is that the word "katana" is used in the game. That's not the same thing. Please discuss before you revert again. Remember this key part of Wikipedia:Verifiability: "It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced." Andrew Englehart (talk) 14:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

You're just being contrarian at this point. The text reads "Their names combine into the word 'katana.'" This is literally just the names Kat and Ana without a space. That's not a claim, it's spelling. The textual format of the encyclopedia comes with the inherent implication that the reader can read. Also, you realize video games are valid sources right? That's why they have citation templates. Hence, the citation of the appearance of the phrase "katana" in the game supports the statement that it is a phrase used. The source is valid. Ozdarka (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source is valid for the fact that "katana" is spoken in the game. The part you want to add is not mentioned by any reliable sources. If anyone could add any trivia they wanted to any article, even if it's true, you wouldn't have an encyclopedia - you'd have a massive fan wiki. There's a reason for requiring reliable secondary sources beyond just verifiability - there's also the threshold of "Does this belong in an encyclopedia?" If it's just some thought that a fan had and wants to add to an article, then no, it doesn't, even if that thought happens to be true. See

WP:SYNTHESIS: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." Andrew Englehart (talk) 15:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I don't think it's synthesis but can accept that it might not be noteworthy. I didn't write the part of the article in question and have no attachment to it. Ozdarka (talk) 20:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Donkey Kong 3 into Donkey Kong. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:35, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, sorry for being uncivil when reverting an edit of yours. In hindsight, that last part of my summary was uncalled for, and as such, I apologize. GeniusReading2310 (talk) 16:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool Ozdarka (talk) 20:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why does cultural impact deserve its own section and why have you not even moved it to the cast section? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=X-Men_Origins:_Wolverine — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.108.180 (talk) 22:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the comment from Indian Country Today to the cast section. The other sources you cited didn't connect whitewashing to the film, you were the one making the connection, which is synthesis. I didn't write the cultural impact section. Ozdarka (talk) 22:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Game Boy Advance family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game Boy Advance family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

« Ryūkotsusei » 20:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]