User talk:Paintgol

Welcome!

Hello, Paintgol, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Привіт! I noticed you are interested in Ukraine-related articles, so you may want to check out the WikiProject Ukraine, a tool to help perfect the Ukrainian related articles on the English Wikipedia. We would be glad to have you as a member of WikiProject Ukraine! — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:01, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm HelicopterLlama. Paintgol, thanks for creating Glib Vysheslavsky!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This appears to be translated from Russian.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Glib Vysheslavsky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Installation, Long, Den, Mentone and Merz

Olena Golub (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Matrices

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, I have requested the page you blanked (

Hello, Paintgol, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Irina Vysheslavska, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Iryna Vysheslavska. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

1. a link to the article you copied from
2. the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia!

The article Glib Vysheslavsky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient notability for

WP:Artist

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicholas Zalevsky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Zalevsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theredproject (talk) 22:42, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NoACEMM--Paintgol (talk) 07:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hope you will see, that this article is not so bad for the beginning, in time somebody will add more information and sourses. Now there are independent sources, reliable and verifiability, without commercial publicity, connected with art.There is currently exists only one text now [[Ágnes HAász|], but it's mistake that it was redirected to the identically text [[Ágnes HAász|]. Please help to correct it. Thank you.--Paintgol (talk) 19:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We require that the content of an article is verifiable. That is one of our foundational policies. If all the sources are by the subject, or by people or organizations closely affiliated with the subject, the article is not verifiable. I moved it to the Draft namespace so that it won't be deleted, and you have an opportunity to improve the citations before returning it to main article space. I did not change the title of the article. As you can see in the move log [1] on 16:43, 11 December 2021 Vexations moved page Ágnes HAász to Draft:Ágnes HAász Vexations (talk) 20:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

HAász is a living person.

reliable source (which must of course be independent of HAász), virtually all of it would have to be removed. (See also this

.)

Don't use "<br />" to create quasi-paragraphs. In order to create a new paragraph, hit the Enter key twice. (I have made this change for the longest section of this draft.)

Three of the four "sources" are short pieces within "HAász Ágnes . Catalog of works. Budapest, 2000", with

ISBN 963-440-084-1

. Worldcat shows no library possessing a copy of this. Is the number correct?

Neither of the articles Hungarian alphabet and Hungarian orthography seems to say anything to explain the odd capitalization of "HAász". Why "HAász" and not "Haász"?

I notice that the creator of this draft is also the person who

conflict of interest

?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ágnes HAász and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ágnes HAász, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 03:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paintgol! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 03:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you I've added information from different sources ( to W. Kandinsky's). I know that "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and avoid novel interpretations of primary sources…Deciding whether primary, secondary, or tertiary sources are appropriate in any given instance is a matter of good editorial judgment and common sense, and should be discussed on article talk pages"(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary,_secondary_and_tertiary_sources ). In this article (Hungarian Electrographic Art Association) - I think that citata by PhD Edith Barta is secondary source, not primary, becouse it's analytic objective material.--Paintgol (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are only two sources that are not at computerart.hu and those two don't even mention the HEAA. I don't think there's any significant coverage of this organization in independent, reliable sources. Vexations (talk) 23:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vexations! You are right, so more sources so better. Artists think mostly about colores and shape but not about public relations, sorry. Thank to you there are new additions in articles HEAA and about their President Ágnes HAász. We hope that over time the articles will become richer in information. Please return Ágnes HAász to main Wikipedia space from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:%C3%81gnes_HA%C3%A1sz . Everyone has the right to edit on Wikipedia and improve articles, this is democracy! (no one wants to edit the draft). Thank you very much.--Paintgol (talk) 19:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hungarian Electrographic Art Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungarian Electrographic Art Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vexations (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are no Fails WP:NORG. Verification of this source is successful and reliable: 1.[2] 2020 FILM AWARDS Best Experimental Short: FLOATING WORLD – LIFE 1.0, Dénes Ruzsa and Fruzsina Spitzer, Hungary. 2.[3]EXHIBITIONS 2020 3rd prize (Marcil Lavallée Prize) to O. Golub, Ukraine, for Keys.

This is not primary source, it’s secondary, because of PhD Edith Barta is not member HEAA . She is independent theorist who writes for different editions, not especial for this. --Paintgol (talk) 18:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any other User accounts on wikipedia to disclose? Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 22:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC) No, I have not. Thanks--Paintgol (talk) 16:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vilen Barskyi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll correct error. Paintgol (talk) 16:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Paintgol. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've seen Paintgol (talk) 05:50, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Paintgol (talk) 03:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I no longer wish to receive these messages thank you. Paintgol (talk) 03:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Paintgol. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Unfortunately I can't fix the comments that make the article look bad, I don't have better sources for the article. I think the deletion is unfair, but I can't prove it. Paintgol (talk) 22:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Igor Golomstock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olena Golub, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Fernando.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IIt was corrected, thanks Paintgol (talk) 03:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]