User talk:Pamzeis/Archive/2020

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello Pamzeis! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal/Ronz (talk ) 02:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have

If you work from

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 02:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

• Note - posting an image on Instagram does not make it public domain. -- Whpq (talk) 15:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crown Lake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emily Skinner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

I think perhaps you made a mistake. Can you please explain - as you did not leave an edit summary, as you should - your thinking in making this deletion? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_people_from_Ontario&diff=975558014&oldid=975557892

--2604:2000:E010:1100:64C5:E4D6:C957:937A (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I did make a mistake. I’ll add it again now.—Pamzeis (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

You deleted my last revert in 'Space Race'. My friend at school dared me to do it. Could you please revert it back and leave it for 10 more minutes so that he can see it? I doesn't believe that I would be brave enough.

Contact if I can't respond: [email protected]

Thank you, B. Holding — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.130.33.238 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I can’t revert since Wikipedia is not a place for playing around with dares. If your friend would like to view your edit, they can view it here. Please don’t revert it again. Thanks! Pamzeis (talk) 08:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dalila Bela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

I pretty sure you didn't mean to revert to this version [1] Meters (talk) 23:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Yes, sorry, I didn’t mean to revert it. I was trying to revert the revision with vandalism. Pamzeis (talk) 00:59, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi

For more information on the user rights and how to use rollback, see this tutorial page.

I'm sure you'll do fine with rollback - it's a pretty straight-forward user right and it doesn't drastically change the interface you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my user talk page if you run into any questions, have any issues or troubles, or if you run into a revision or situation where you're not sure if using rollback is appropriate or not and need my input or advice - I'll be more than happy to help you any time you need it. If you no longer want the rollback user rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove it for you. Thank you for helping to locate, revert, and remove vandalism from Wikipedia - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The one thing I need to note that gave me some reserve from giving you this user right, was the fact that you haven't made a single report to

patrolling recent changes, you've seem to have done well, and for that I thank you! You've made a couple of mistakes, but they're minor, and you admit to those mistakes when asked about them on your user talk page and you fix the issue. That, above all else, makes someone a good patroller. You're doing well, and I think that your future on Wikipedia is very bright. Keep up the great work, and please don't hesitate to reach out to me if I can offer any input, help, assistance, or anything that you need. I'll be happy to lend a hand. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)}

02:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi! I reverted you here because the vandal you were reverting actually fixed vandalism by another vandal (look at "Pedo Man" in the text). I then roll backed them both and asked for page protection, multiple vandals make life difficult with rollbacks. 11Fox11 (talk) 03:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at

Isaac Kragten

(September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

Odd Squad (TV series)

. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the

reliable source

, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the

the Teahouse

.

In particular, see and refer to

WP:NACTOR

for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

It appears that his roles in the Odd Squad are the only roles that can be considered major roles. Multiple major roles are required for individual notability. If he has had other major roles, please explain what those roles are, or what other notability criteria are met, when resubmitting.

This draft has been declined because of

notability

concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the

the Teahouse

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Isaac Kragten
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Isaac Kragten, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Pamzeis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Pamzeis! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:06, Friday, October 2, 2020 (

UTC

)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
73		The Palace (computer program) (talk)	Add sources
27		Ventino (talk)	Add sources
37		Tag and Bink (talk)	Add sources
115		Indiana Massara (talk)	Add sources
31		Virtual Places Chat (talk)	Add sources
114		Ghost (musical) (talk)	Add sources
6,028		Peyton List (actress, born 1998) (talk)	Cleanup
14,794		Microsoft Teams (talk)	Cleanup
26		Instantbird (talk)	Cleanup
312		Fallen (Kate novel) (talk)	Expand
119		A-wing (talk)	Expand
446		Frozen (franchise) (talk)	Expand
348		Languages in Star Wars (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
930		Maleficent (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
55		Genie in the House (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
388		Messaging apps (talk )	Merge
1,226		Instant messaging (talk)	Merge
240		Star Wars video games (talk)	Merge
98		Honor killing in the United States (talk)	Wikify
186		Threema (talk)	Wikify
2,550		Slack (software) (talk)	Wikify
21		Maheeda (talk)	Orphan
138		Overwolf (talk)	Orphan
29		Hex Hall (talk)	Orphan
7		Aleksey Kudryavtsev (talk)	Stub
27		Finch (software) (talk)	Stub
9		National Solidarity (Peru) (talk)	Stub
71		Zulip (talk)	Stub
19		talk )	Stub
12		Luke Greenbank (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:59, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Mustafa raji asfari

You said that Mustafa raji asfari already exists on the Arabic Wikipedia, but the link you gave goes to their Main Page. Can you provide the link to that article in particular instead? Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

@Jackmcbarn: Sorry, it was a mistake. I've removed the tag now and the message on the User:Mustafa Raji Asfari's talk page. Thanks for notifying me! Pamzeis (talk) 03:13, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Re: Neutral Point of View

Hi Pamzeis,

I added an edit to the Notable People section in Forest Lake, MN. Instead of just taking down my edit, you took down the entire mention of the notable person. First of all, my edit was neutral. People from all over the world, particularly in Europe, do refer to Ryan Young as the voice of a generation. It started as tongue in cheek, but quickly grew into a legitimate statement. The music of Ryan Young is cherished by many people and how they refer to the person who writes these songs isn’t an issue of neutrality. It is how Ryan Young is referred to and is %100 accurate. Secondly, instead of just removing my one sentence edit, you removed the entire mention of Ryan Young. That doesn’t seem fair or right. He most definitely is a notable person from Forest Lake, MN and it is sad that you get to decide what is real and what is not based simply on a hunch of not being neutral. You are downplaying, even basically erasing, a man’s lifelong work and accomplishments. So, please reconsider my validated edit, or at the very least, don’t take away the complete mention of Ryan Young from Forest Lake’s notable people.

Thanks

Original message: Hello, I'm Pamzeis. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Forest Lake, Minnesota seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pamzeis (talk) 03:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC) Garth99 (talk) 18:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello

reliable source that says he is, you may be able to re-add it. Secondly, I was not the one who removed the mention of Ryan Young in Forest Lake, Minnesota, that was Meters. If you would like to leave a message on Meter's talk page, please do so. Thank you. Pamzeis (talk

) 00:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Mosley (US lawyer)

Hi Pamzeis. Would you mind expanding on your closing statement for

WP:SNG, which SNG? Thanks, Lev!vich

17:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

I have the same concerns about your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Dock; how did you come to the conclusion that the Keep voters had any basis in policies and guidelines? Because as the nominator I don't see how it could have been closed as anything other then Delete. Iffy★Chat -- 17:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Per

WP:NOTAVOTE, in addition to the two above, these AFDs appear to me to be close calls based on the numbers: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stark, Arizona (3-2), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monroe District (Santa Rosa, California) (2-1), and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night Call (podcast) (3-2). Lev!vich

18:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

I have the same concerns about the Cindy Dock closure (as a delete voter); while the vote count leans towards keep, I don't believe the argument strength does.

π, ν

) 19:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Deletion review for

Cindy Dock

An editor has asked for a

π, ν

) 19:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at

Isaac Kragten

(October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at

the Teahouse

.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be

topic-ban

may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the

reliable source

, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the

the Teahouse

.

In particular, see and refer to

WP:NACTOR

for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

This draft was already declined once, with the statement that the subject appeared to have only one major role. It has now been resubmitted exactly as it was when it was previously declined, which is

partial block

may be requested.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Isaac Kragten
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Isaac Kragten, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

It might be a good idea not to do any more

acting notability, or you do not understand that sometimes it is better to discuss first and resubmit afterwards. Robert McClenon (talk

) 21:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isaac Kragten has been accepted

Isaac Kragten, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pamzeis! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk ) 19:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Relists and NACS

Please read

WP:NAC. You should not be relisting discussions for a third time. Praxidicae (talk

) 00:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Also to add to what

WP:AFD until you have significantly more experience. There is no lack of closers/admins willing to relist but there is a dearth of participants, so please start by participating in the discussions. Praxidicae (talk

) 00:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Actually after reviewing your talk page with the multiple messages from experienced editors about your pseudo-admin actions, I am going to formally ask you to refrain from NACs or relists given your apparently lack of communication or understanding. Praxidicae (talk) 00:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Questions for Pamzeis

Hi Pamzeis! You were very welcoming in regards to my contributions, thank you for that! It would be immensely appreciated if you could answer the questions I had about wikipedia below. Firstly, I have been a member of Wikipedia for more than four days and have made significantly more than ten edits. Do you know why I am not an auto confirmed user yet? Secondly, if you have the authority to look and accept drafts, would it be possible if you could quickly look over the articles I wrote! Thank you so much Pamzeis, --Coreykai (talk) 02:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Corey Kai

Hi

WP:WikiProject Articles for Creation. Thanks! Pamzeis (talk

) 03:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

A question about reverting my edit

Hey, I saw you reverted my merging of Brooklyn Nelson's theatre credits table for Frozen? I don't see why it shouldn't be merged - I have seen many theatre actors whose articles have merged title names in their credits, eg: Ben Platt, Jonathan Groff, Samantha Barks. DaveZombee (talk) 09:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi

WP:Some stuff exists for a reason. Thanks. Pamzeis (talk

) 11:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC)