User talk:PatGallacher/Archive 10

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

You are invited to join the discussion at

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your source(s).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 12:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, PatGallacher. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Héctor Recalde, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Héctor Recalde to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Pat. I've just nominated Jennifer White Shah for deletion. The only significant coverage of her I can find is related to her hubby's troubles, but if you have better sources that deal with her career you can remove the proposed deletion tag. --Hillbillyholiday ^talk 13:08, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Pedro José de Fonte y Hernández Miravete!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 18:01, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

On multiple occasions you have added material to this article without there being any corresponding source to support it. I went through the article and removed some material where there is no source apparent, or where it appears to conflict with information in existing sources. You reinstated this unsourced material without any attempt to provide sources for it. As the article is the biography of a living person I have again removed these unsourced claims. Drchriswilliams (talk) 07:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

No source? I added the material as a cite https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/11/voted-corbyn-scottish-independence-labour-nationalist - You have absolutely no right to call this vandalism. She quite clearly states she votes Labour now. Briever (talk) 20:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Briever

I never said this was vandalism or unsourced. I did say that I thought it was undue weight and using Wikipedia as a platform to put this in the lede, since this point is included, with the link you mention, later in the article. PatGallacher (talk) 20:20, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

I'd like to propose a deletion to the article 'List of Television Shows considered the Worst".

Under the 'Gameshow' section the ITV comedy hypnosis show 'You're Back in the Room' is listed and I think it's wrong for it to be included.

In the (unusually) brief description it states that it was poorly received and panned for being fraudulent. It then cites an article that was first self published on the internet and picked up by the Daily Mail BEFORE the first episode had actually aired! When the first episode did air it was the highest rated entertainment launch of the year (BARB analysis) and even won the International Formats Awards Best Studio-based Gameshow in 2016. There were also some positive reviews that can be found very easily online and it sold to several international territories. I don't believe it's inclusion in the list adheres to Wikipedia's own parameters and metrics for this article:

"NOTE: Before adding shows. Remember-- this is "worst." There are a lot of "bad" shows out there. There are a lot of shows which individual people might consider "worst." However, it should only be listed as a worst show if it can be attributed as such in at least one reliable source." Paul9006 (talk) 12:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Miles Walker Mattinson!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this article. Like many you've created, it has no clear sources. Is the external link actually a source? If so, can you make it clear in the article, or let me know and I'll amend it for you. If it is not, can you please add your source? Could you please start making your references clear/clearer in the articles? Thanks for your time.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 18:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Willie Rough!

I've just tagged the page, using our

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 18:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mudyug concentration camp, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

The article

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis Héron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Héron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

PAt, I contacted you yesterday about not adding references to articles you create, as I and other editors have discussed with you before. You not only didn't add a source to that article, you within hours created

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Société populaire de Nantes!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as unreferenced and with unclear notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

The article Société populaire de Nantes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information is not verified, and 'article' is so vague I'm unclear what it is actually about.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

The article Colette Wilde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet

WP:RELIABLESOURCES

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

The article Bobby Pattinson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet

WP:RELIABLESOURCES

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muriel McKay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Juan Alfonso de Polanco!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as having only one source, but is an article of good length and detail. Well done!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 05:47, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Guillaume Lamberty!

I've just tagged the page, using our

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 18:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Pat, you have been asked many times now to make clear your sourcing on articles you create - are your external links friendly suggestions or actually ources, so should have one of the usual headings of 'Notes', 'Sources' or 'References' and preferably be

If you prefer headings like Notes to External links fair enough, but I question if this is a big deal. In the case of Baldomer, the source is the Catalan Wikipedia article. PatGallacher (talk) 15:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

See

Thanks for responding to me and for linking to an interesting essay. Thank you also for agreeing to change the title. The reason it is commonly notes, references or sources is because an external links section is often just friendly suggestions, and often in addition to references. Labelling it notes just makes it totally clear to those using it for research, but also for people like me patrolling new pages. I now know not to mark your creations as unreferenced. Boleyn (talk) 16:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Also, as for DEMOLISH, many of these articles, e.g. Pedro José de Fonte y Hernández Miravete, were created as much as three months ago, and tagged two months ago as unreferenced, with you being alerted at the time, and it still has no references at all. It isn't really about giving it more time. You might alo find working on something in the sandbox until it is referenced means your articles won't be regularly prodded, which can be a bit of a waste of time for you and other editors. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The

discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here

.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--John (talk) 13:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Ponce I, Count of Urgell!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. All articles must have sources. Pat, you are well aware of this. PLEASE stop creating unreferenced articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 16:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Eleanor Nathan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Don't worry about that, I declined the request and expanded the article with some sources. Take a look and feel free to fix/expand it more. I also thought it would be a good candidate for

WP:DYK and nominated it at Template:Did you know nominations/Eleanor Nathan. Regards SoWhy

09:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Ray Rigby (screenwriter), PatGallacher!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please do not use imdb as a source, it is specifically mentioned at

WP:RELIABLESOURCES

as an unreliable source. It has also been tagged as of dubious notability.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about

Boleyn (talk) 18:32, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Aurelio Díaz, PatGallacher!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged as a blp with no clear sources (if the external link is actually a source, please add that clearly). As a blp, it also needs its sources to be

WP:NPOL

. It has also bee tagged as an orphaned page and as a stub.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about

Boleyn (talk) 18:37, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Cristina Rodríguez (noble)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as benefiting from more of the sources being inline, so readers can easily see which sources have verified which pieces of information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 07:05, 31 October 2017 (UTC)