User talk:PeterGriffin11298

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Hello, PeterGriffin11298!
helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! [[User:Dlohcierekim's sock|]] (talk) 00:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

{{SUBST:UW-UNSOURCED1|Wesley Jonathan}} -

talk) 01:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello

Please don't recreate redirects without sources. We have a policy on

notability and each of these requires references in the articles to show importance to the encyclopedia as a whole. ThemFromSpace 01:42, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page

external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sea Beast

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright
infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

talk) 23:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

  1. external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
    ]

speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain. Thank you. Intelligentsium 23:21, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Nathan Pearson. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. tedder (talk) 23:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Lisa Robin Kelly

Just to let you know, I removed your recent edits to

WP:BLP, anything dealing with a biography page must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy, and reliably sourced. The link you gave for your edits directs to a 404 page, so there's no verification for what you added. As something contentious, the material you added to her page would need to be impeccably sourced. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a note. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 00:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

talk) 23:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Bryan Fisher

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bryan Fisher, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not notable. Needs a significant role and significant coverage in independent reliable sources. His most noted role is minor and only sourcing is to an all-encompassing database.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

talk) 18:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Argiris Karras

A

Argiris Karras
, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

talk) 19:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Final warning

talk) 19:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Brian Kubach

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brian Kubach, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No notable roles and no reliable sources means not notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

talk) 21:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Nick Jonas

Please refrain from adding dubiously sourced (and poorly written) content to biographies of living persons. Blogcritics.org doesn't even sound like a reliable source, and it doesn't read like one either. It should be obvious that your comment re: Miley Cyrus was a shot below the belt--and it was done without evidence. Also, referring to other editors as "idiots" is not a very smart or civil thing to do, and may invite pot/kettle comparisons. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:26, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Hapka

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mark Hapka, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

talk) 15:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Christopher Oneal Warren

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Christopher Oneal Warren, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

talk) 15:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:BLP

talk) 15:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of The Danny McKay Project

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Danny McKay Project, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable film. Appears to fail WP:NONFILM

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ttonyb1 (talk) 18:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mark Hapka

I have nominated Mark Hapka, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Hapka. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DreamGuy (talk) 00:17, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Brian Kubach

talk) 16:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Christopher Oneal Warren

talk) 17:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Sock puppetry case

You have been accused of

talk) 23:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

I swear, I am not a sockpuppet. I've never even heard of the user Zach Benjamin or PeteHastings, and there is no way I would do something like that. I became a user to help wikipedia, and I would never make multiple accounts, one which is for good and one which is for bad. I am not a sockpuppet. Please don't accuse me. Thank you, and you're a very nice user

SummerPhd. PeterGriffin11298 (talk) 00:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Swearing accomplishes nothing. Calling me "very nice" accomplishes nothing. Please see
talk) 02:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Kris Munroe. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 01:12, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Danny McKay Project

I have nominated The Danny McKay Project, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Danny McKay Project. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ttonyb1 (talk) 19:45, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Argiris Karras

The article

Argiris Karras has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP, not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

talk) 13:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Chris Zylka

talk) 13:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Unreferenced BLPs

unreferencedBLP
}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Drake Kemper - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Argiris Karras - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Tommy Lioutas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Jordan Francis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Allen Evangelista - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:47, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Argiris Karras

talk) 03:49, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Spectacular! cast

renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Mbinebri  talk ← 02:22, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of Drake Kemper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drake Kemper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drake Kemper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jordan Francis

Notice

The article Jordan Francis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, and no reliable sources for any of the information in the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tommy Lioutas

Notice

The article Tommy Lioutas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unref blp that doesn't meet

WP:GNG
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Allen Evangelista for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allen Evangelista is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Evangelista until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PeterGriffin11298&oldid=1085983964"