User talk:Prosfilaes/Archive

This is a selective archive of important (to me) posts from my talk page. Unimportant posts can be read from the history on my talk page.

Hello,

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks:

• If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.

• You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.

• If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the
  votes for undeletion
  page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 19:21, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

de:Lily Braun, for which you requested translation has been translated by User:Saintswithin and is now available at Lily Braun -- Jmabel 18:20, Jul 27, 2004 (UTC)

I've removed the cryptic reference to

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also
  Wikipedia:Topical index
  .

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 9 July 2005 02:31 (UTC)

You marked User:Ababyseal with test markers twice, but I only see one edit. I'm not sure why you started with test2, either. I'm at least removing test4 from his talk page.--Prosfilaes 01:41, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted pages don't show up in a user's contributions list. It's a known bug. --fvw* 01:42, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comment on talk:pseudoscience regarding David R Hawkins. I've started to edit the article and moved it towards NPOV, but additional work is needed. I'm getting up to speed on the subject. It appears that one particular editor, an unregistered anon, has been making edits with a strong POV. Any help bringing the article up to standards would be appreciated. -Willmcw 01:35, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the WP article and the page at mrsbeeton.com, and I checked the discussion page, and saw no discussion, but it looked to me like the WP article lifted the text at mrsbeeton.com without permission or attribution and that mrsbeeton.com is not a WP mirror. If I'm wrong, OK, but I promise that I acted in good faith. Ben-w 09:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I did check the goddam article history. Please don't patronize me. Large chunks of text have survived from the first iteration to the most recent. If you can attest to a harmless explanation for why the texts from both sources are so similar, then you could have simply reverted my change with that explanation. You haven't done so, you've chosen to badger me about it instead, which I think is considerably less constructive. Ben-w 07:29, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]