User talk:RedLiquorice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


RedLiquorice, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi RedLiquorice! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

talk) 16:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The Conjuring 2: The Enfield Poltergeist has been nominated for Did You Know

DYK for The Conjuring 2: The Enfield Poltergeist

{{tmbox

talk
) 22:26, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |type = notice |image = Updated DYK query |text = On
The Conjuring 2: The Enfield Poltergeist, the set was blessed by a priest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Conjuring 2: The Enfield Poltergeist. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, &dateto=2015-10-31 live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page
. }} Gatoclass (talk) 19:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, RedLiquorice. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 17:38, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 01:17, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 01:17, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol and the unreviewed template

Hi RedLiquorice, I wanted to touch base in light of your many excellent articles created! I

New Page Reviewer. The admin reviewing the nomination points out to me, however, that you've marked your creations with the {{unreviewed}} template, perhaps indicating that you'd prefer to continue having a reviewer check over your new submissions. Is that right? Totally fine if so, you're entirely welcome to carry on just as you have been--I just wanted to confirm that's your preference, rather than the template just being habit or auto-generated somehow (apparently it can be, though I'm not sure which tool generates it.) In any case, thanks for all your excellent work on the encyclopedia! All best, Innisfree987 (talk) 04:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi Innisfree987, I'm happy to continue having my new creations checked by a reviewer, but I guess using the template has been more habit than anything else. Thank you for kind words anyhow! RedLiquorice (talk) 09:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've accepted Template:Films directed by Michael Dougherty

Template:Films directed by Michael Dougherty
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phillip J. Bartell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phillip J. Bartell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip J. Bartell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 20:31, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KGirl (Wanna chat?) 12:30, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Susan Johnson has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ToThAc (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sierra Burgess Is a Loser) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sierra Burgess Is a Loser, RedLiquorice!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Applied a few fixes.

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

Robert G. (talk) 17:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (SPF-18) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating SPF-18, RedLiquorice!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Removed the unreviewed tag.

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about

page curation
.

Robert G. (talk) 18:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Vera Farmiga

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

talk) 04:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Your GA nomination of Vera Farmiga

The article

talk) 15:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Non-occupations

The opening sentence of an article is supposed to be brief, not a crammed-together resumé of everything a person has done. That's why MOS specifically says not to "overload" it. Freddie Highmore is an actor. Nestor Carbonell is an actor. That is what they are known for. Neither of them writes or directs... except in conjunction with their acting. "In general, a position, activity, or role should not be included the lead paragraph if... the role is auxiliary to a main profession of the person (e.g. do not add "textbook writer", if the person is an academic)."[1] Filling in to direct an episode or a few of a TV series that you act in doesn't make you a "director", any more than driving the delivery truck at work a few times makes me a "truck driver". It makes you an actor who got to fill in as a director. Likewise with writing, or producing a show that you star in: that's what MOS means by "auxiliary". Now, if Carbonell gets a full-time gig a director of a show he isn't acting in, that would make him a "director". And if Highmore writes or produces a TV show that he isn't starring in, and it gets on the air, that might be notable enough to add those titles to the lede and infobox. But for now, it's overloading, and it's contrary to MOS. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 21:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a rule of thumb, try this: take away their "actor" credits. Would their remaining credits (as writer, director, producer) pass WP's standards for Notability? If not, then it's not what they're notable for, and it doesn't belong in the lede. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 21:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vera Farmiga

Hi. I just gave support to Vera Farmiga on screen and stage. Care to look at my new FLC: Tom Mix filmography? Jimknut (talk) 20:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zac and Mia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased web series. It will potentially be notable in Wikipedia terms if it gets significant coverage in independent sources once it's released, but

we don't second-guess what the reception to something is going to be
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Iridescent 17:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RedLiquorice. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger (upcoming American film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

Articles for Creation template atop the page. — Zawl 14:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

talk) 17:13, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

talk) 17:16, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

talk) 17:19, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

talk) 17:25, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RedLiquorice. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Captive State.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Guy Nattiv

Hello, RedLiquorice. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guy Nattiv
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
To All the Boys I've Loved Before 2
has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

talk · contribs) 18:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Final Girls soundtrack cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NormaLouiseBates.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of Josh Casaubon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Casaubon, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Casaubon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Tiger (unreleased film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 13 § Tiger (unreleased film) until a consensus is reached. 2pou (talk) 19:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Whispers ABC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Whispers ABC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]