User talk:Resolute/Archive 5
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
NHL goaltender decision
I saw your edit with clarifying comments. I didn't know that goaltender decision is based upon who lets in the game-winning goal. Thanks for clarifying that.--Fogeltje (talk) 08:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Personal Attack Re: Ottawa Senators Article
No personal attack was meant toward Freshfighter9, only a description of his actions. Having a open discussion on a topic is fine by me, but his comments showed that he was not open to any discussion what so ever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Friarcanuck (talk • contribs) 22:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Rio de Janeiro bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics
Hey Resolute! How long! I finally nominated Rio de Janeiro bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics for Featured Article status, and I wish your review on it, as you passed this article to the Good Article status. Best regards; Felipe Menegaz 21:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- P.S. Congratulations (a little too late) on the victory of Canada over the United States in ice hockey during the Vancouver Olympics. Felipe Menegaz 21:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Pre-emptive indefinite semi-protection of John Laws
Hi Resolute,
Thank you for your support. As you may have noticed, the discussion has now been archived here.
I care a lot about this case and its more general implications. Could you please let me know how I can escalate it? I have seen many admin abuses before and some of them were even more disturbing, but this stands out as one of the most indefensible ones.
I have left a similar note to MickMacNee.
Thanks. 124.87.97.84 (talk) 13:46, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Truthfully, that situation seems to be stuck in a stalemate. Your best bet, I think, would be to make the effort to improve that article. Casliber has promised to lift the protection if someone is willing to do that, and since you are interested in the article, that would be the cleanest route forward. Resolute 22:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
BCHL Express
Could you move the
Thanks
Thanks for spotting and correcting my mistake on 2009–10 Calgary Flames season, sometimes these typo's or copy/paste mistakes sneak in and remain unnoticed. For some reason, when I double check my entry before submitting there's never a mistake but whenever I skip the double check there is one and thus makes it into the article ;) Guess it's a Murphy's Law. I'm glad this season is over. Hopefully better luck next year. Can't wait.--Fogeltje (talk) 11:58, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
I have to say I love that image everytime this debate comes up. It really is the perfect example of just how bad a trend these navboxes have become. I wish the entire wiki would wipe them out completely and then come up with a much more clean way to do it from scratch. As they do have some uses, but the current system is just rediculous. -DJSasso (talk) 16:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- The navbox problem is a pretty epic fail, I agree. That reminds me that I should probably get back to removing the draft pick and coaches navboxes, though the tedium pretty much stopped me. Resolute 17:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Since you spoke up in my recent thread, I ask that you please check
Vancouver Canucks Media Guide
Hello, I recently asked a question on the [Canucks task force page] about division championships since I have been having trouble sourcing the period of time when the NHL had Divisional Playoffs. I was hoping that some one would have a Canucks Media Guide to help me source the correct number of championships, and DJSasso (talk) mentioned that he thought you had Media guides for all teams. I was hoping you could help me with this issue, essentially I need a reference that the Canucks won a division Championship in 1981-82 and did not win one in 1991-92 and 1992-93 before I attempted to get List of Vancouver Canucks seasons to FL status. Any help would be greatly appreciated--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice. I will email the Canucks and I will make the suggested changes--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 14:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Brenden Morrow
I am working on improving this article, and was wondering if you had an image of Morrow in Team Canada duds? I noticed you had several guys from the Olympic camp, and figure I would check. Cheers! Canada Hky (talk) 00:26, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking! Canada Hky (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Category:Calgary Cowboys (WHA) players
Please add your thoughts regarding my proposal found at Category talk:Calgary Cowboys (WHA) players. Thank you. Dolovis (talk) 22:39, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
D 400 template
I voted the same way you did. I liked your comment "attempt to link articles with a non-defining attribute." Would you care to elaborate on this a bit more? I think you have hit on something that I would like to remember for future use. The articles are cities/places. Is the road a "non-defining attribute"? Student7 (talk) 14:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
in common
We have some things in common. One is Wikicup. I am in the second round but it will be very close whether or not I make the third round.
Another is policy ideas. You wrote "Generally, this guideline should reflect core policy: WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, etc. As a reflection of policy, it should not be made into policy itself."
Do you firmly believe this? This statement was so convincing that I changed my opinion about changing a guideline to a policy. So would you, in theory, be opposed to a policy based on another guideline? In theory, the policy might be made more broad (and less of repeating a guideline) or the policy rewritten to just govern broad policy and the guideline govern some more specific?
If so, I would like to begin a short discussion with you. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 21:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Look here:
Now look here:
1. It refers to the main document (link) as the WP:ONEEVENT guideline. A policy should not point to a guideline, it's vice versa. Links for info are ok but not the link that say "Main" as in main article.
2. The policy is not written in a neutral fashion. It basically is prohibits articles on people known for one event, except in exceptional cases.
3. The policy conflicts with the main guideline that it refers to. (see 1 and 2)
People should not decide on what to do based on their goals. Deletionists should not try to make things so difficult so that no article qualifies. Inclusionists should not try to say anything goes. What we should do is to make the policy and guidelines compatible. Actually, the guideline is written better than the policy. The policy might read that caution should be given about writing about one event people be somewhat vague. The guideline should then refer to the policy and give more specific advice. The guidelines would be subject to change more often and the policy would, hopefully, not change as often.
Let's discuss this before acting further. A study group working on this (you and me to begin with) might not be a bad idea. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 22:38, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
What administrator has a good reputation, is well respected, and might understand this issue? The next thing to do would be to discuss among all 3 of us how to reword it. Once we agree, we can present a well thought of idea. If I, for example, just go there now and suggest, the product would not be as well thought out as if we discussed things first. This is not collusion but thoughtfulness. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 22:56, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Muhammad disclaimer
Is there a good reason why we can't be sensitive about this with a hatnote? It doesn't seem like a big deal to include... -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, given it hasn't been discussed since 2008 I've bought it up again. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
BLP ideas
Please review the following and let me know if my idea is too wacky. I do not want to propose a wacky idea.
Existing version
Subjects notable only for one event
Policy shortcut: WP:BLP1E
Main page: Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable only for one event
Wikipedia is not news, or an indiscriminate collection of information. Merely being in the news does not imply someone should be the subject of Wikipedia article. If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having an article on them. Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with neutral point of view. In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article. If the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial, a separate biography may be appropriate. Individuals notable for well-documented events, such as John Hinckley, Jr., fit into this category. The significance of an event or individual should be indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources.
Reason for replacement: You understand it well. A policy referring to the main article, which is a guideline, a policy which is not as well written as the guideline, etc.
Possible replacement
Subjects notable only for one event
Policy shortcut: WP:BLP1E
Main page: Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable only for one event
Wikipedia is not news, or an indiscriminate collection of information. Merely being in the news does not imply someone should be the subject of Wikipedia article.
Wikipedia:Notability (people) offers guidelines as to inclusion of subjects notable only for one event.
Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 22:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. I start thinking about the long version. How about the contradiction? Guideline says beware, maybe but policy has evolved into a "prohibited unless Hinckley" Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
new
The BLP1E section refers to the "main" article. You agreed that the main article was better written. Since it wasn't too long, I pasted it to BLP1E. After all, why have a poorly written summary when the main text isn't too long. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#People_notable_only_for_one_event
"centre" → "center"
Hey, remember not to change "center" to "centre" when the "center" in question is actually an HTML argument. Someone ought to change HTML so that the two terms are interchangeable... — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 02:32, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
The Charity Barnstar | ||
To Resolute, for crafting an incredibly moving and well-written article about Terry Fox. Karanacs (talk) 14:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC) |
I actually cried while reading this, and it's solidified my plans to participate in the next
- I'm honoured you feel that way after reading the article. Thanks. :) Resolute 16:18, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Second that. Great job! Nikkimaria (talk) 03:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
NHL/Stanley Cup Titles
so the Canadiens have 25 right? Warriorshockey1 (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- 25 NHL titles and 24 stanley cups. The Stanley cup wasn't always the championship trophy of the league. -DJSasso (talk) 17:00, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah. It gets confusing because the Stanley Cup wasn't the NHL championship for the first ten years of the league's existence. The Canadiens have 25 NHL titles, 24 Stanley Cups and 23 Stanley Cups as members of the NHL. They won the NHL titles in 1919 (O'Brien Trophy) and 1925 (PoW Trophy) but failed to win the Stanley Cup in either of those two seasons. Resolute 17:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Reviewed this article, its currently on hold, looks pretty good, mostly some minor things, and a few omissions. Canada Hky (talk) 19:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Toronto FC
I thought that since 3 out of the 4 WikiProjects have it rated as B-Class, it might be good to have something on the talkpage to work with. Kingjeff (talk) 19:34, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Administrator
Are you an administrator? Kingjeff (talk) 19:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- I recently started WikiProject Association Football competitions. There are a couple people who disagree with this WikiProject being set-up. Namely Jmorrison230582 has an issue with it. He/she has made several edits like this one. And I have readded the template without deleting the other template he is using. As showen here he even called my actions as "Perverse behaviour" which I am taking great offence to. So, what do you think should be done about this? Kingjeff (talk) 19:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Let's point out a few facts here.
It's too hard of a sell since they're trying to delete the project. Is there anyway you ca nrevert and protect the page. Kingjeff (talk) 16:40, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- As an uninvolved admin, I think you might want to let this one go. They are right, you are just duplicating another project that is already in existance. Instead of arguing with them why don't you just try and work with them and make sure the existing project covers what you want it to cover. No use wasting yours and others time on duplicating work. -DJSasso (talk) 16:51, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
I think officially, there are 3 members including myself. Kingjeff (talk) 19:38, 13 May 2010 (UTC) Here is the Member list to prove there are 3 members. I expect another one within the next couple of days. Kingjeff (talk) 23:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
wiki rules
You made an interesting comment to me before. Rather than cutting and pasting your comment, why not make the comment yourself. I posted in the talk page but no response for days. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons#BLP1E
Basically, that section lists a Wikipedia guideline as the main article. The main article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#People_notable_only_for_one_event ) is not very long, just about 4 short paragraphs. It gives clear examples. It is neutral. However, the short version ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons#BLP1E ) is not neutral and basically says no articles are permitted except for Hinckley type cases. I have both pasted the 4 short paragraphs as a replacement and also pasted a short summary of the 4 paragraphs. One person doesn't like it.
What I am asking you is not just another vote. What I am asking is that you know how to express your opinion and have a logical opinion (I need to read it again but I remember it was wise). Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 21:04, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
172.129.216.233
Not sure what happened with your block, the message showed on his talk page, and Huggle showed blocked, but he wasn't, and kept adding the same data! (He is now...) Ronhjones (Talk) 20:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Henrik Sedin copyedit?
Hi Resolute, I currently have Henrik Sedin on FAC and a reviewer recommended you for a copyedit. Would you be able to take the time to go through the article? So far the article has four supports (I think), an oppose and some lengthy comments in regards to prose. If you could take the time, it'd be greatly, greatly appreciated and hopefully be the final step to the article being passed for FA. Cheers. Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 22:24, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the AFD
Tanks for putting Fort Mall up for AFD. I had considered doing it myself but had never done it. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 23:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- NP. I was looking over Canada/Alberta stubs looking for options to expand, and, well, damn! I've been to that mall, and I honestly can't figure out why anyone would go to the trouble to write an article about it. lol. Cheers! Resolute 23:34, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- LOL me too :) -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 23:35, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
DYK for 1971 Memorial Cup
nominate ) 06:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Ed Chynoweth Trophy
Victuallers (talk) 00:05, 1 June 2010 (UTC) DYK for Stafford Smythe Memorial Trophy
Victuallers (talk) 00:05, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Hit the nail right on the head....Have to say I think you hit the nail right on the head there (in your comment on Chris's talk). I was pretty much willing to do whatever it took to get Chris's changes through as long as he was willing to discuss other ways to try and solve how we group information together. But the minute Andy stepped in and went straight for the you must do it our way approach that was it. I think my frustration comes from the fact the hockey project is an extremly easy to work with group of people that have back and forth discussions dispite having extremely opposite views sometimes (like the diacritics), that when I encounter someone who refuses to work with others to come to a solution that works for both that it becomes impossible to deal with them. -DJSasso (talk) 18:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
WikicupI see that you are in Wikicup. I transformed Nokian Tyres from a stub to a GA and have improved it further. Do you want to help me transform it to a FA? Perhaps, fix it this week and submit it and hope that it gets passed by 30 June? Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 21:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC) IP vandalism on userpage-revertedHi. :) The IP vandal 71.233.26.161 vandalised your userpage so I fixed it. Ilikepieittastesgood 03:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept meaning to say....Looks like the Wheaties got the last laugh....but I suppose really Windsor did. -DJSasso (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Pierre McguireHi Resolute. You were helping me little over a year ago edit Pierre McGuire's section. I finally submitted what I thought was a solidly sourced edit but it was not accepted. I looked up the person who denied my entry and from their background and their response to my entry it is clear they don't have the hockey knowledge needed for this task. I wrote him and told him that and asked if you could oversee my changes instead. Here is what my proposed addition looks like now, I did take into account his comments and made some slight changes. While some people enjoy McGuire's analysis and commentary his style does lend itself to criticism. In the past McGuire himself has stated his desire to broadcast "obnoxiously" (1) and in the eyes of some he has succeeded. Even members of the media, which are normally very reserved in their criticism of peers, have taken shots at McGuire. Some have pointed to his lack of credibility as analyst due to dubious performance as a hockey executive (2) while others have mocked his style as a broadcaster (3).
DYK for Cam Fowler
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 8 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks for looking it over. I wasn't in any rush or anything, so its all good. As for the see also section, there is some dispute over that. He had said that he wanted to quit, but he kept getting offers to play, which is in the article. Reading over the sources, I got the impression that while he said he was done, it might have just been another case of him being frustrated with everything, and he probably would go back. He also never exactly retired, so it is kind of uncertain, which is why the link is still there. But I'll go through the article once more here, and then off to FAC for it. Kaiser matias (talk) 17:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC) User:HortontimI hope you'll agree that this user needs to be blocked or even banned as soon as possible due to persistent vandalism and edit warring in the articles Taylor Hall, not to mention the earlier sockpuppet issues. If you are able, please do us all a favor and do something about this trouble maker. I'm getting tired of reverting these puerile edits every day, with nothing being done to stop him/her. Freshfighter9talk 13:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Brandon Gormley
-- Cirt (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC) DYK for Mikael Granlund
-- Cirt (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC) DYK for Derek Forbort
-- Cirt (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC) DYK for Ryan Johansen
-- Cirt (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
DramaoutSee http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Great_Wikipedia_Dramaout/3rd#Participating_Wikipedians and also a mention on WP:ANI. I would love to have you participate! Remember July 5th, the starting date! Suomi Finland 2009 (talk ) 15:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
BravesWhat search term yielded the results that you forwarded?-- WP:FOUR ) 19:06, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Edit conflictYou beat me to the punch three times on 65.4.130.216 edits. :) —Krm500 (Communicate!) 00:33, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
|
2010 Wikicup Semi-finalist | ||
Awarded for progression into the 4th round (semi-finals) of the 2010 Wikicup |
Jere Lehtinen
Wowsers, I got visitors (gotta sign out 'again'). Just to spite the SPA, I hope Lehtinen signs with another team. GoodDay (talk) 20:48, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
He's back & re-adding the A. GoodDay (talk) 23:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
I shall comply (to your request). GoodDay (talk) 00:42, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Please consider rewording...
Your comments here, which I greatly sympathize with, are probably a bit over the top (and if you look around you'll see that I've used some fairly strong language recently...) and might get you into trouble as a personal attack. If you haven't already done so, commenting in the RfC proper would be helpful though... Thanks... Hobit (talk) 01:47, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- I appreciate the concern, but I am going to let my comments stand. I believe Kevin's comments and attitude justifies my remarks, and I am not inclined to mince words with someone hell bent on damaging the project. Resolute 01:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- I personally 100% agree with Resolute on the essence of the comment (I was coming here to support him!) but indeed Hobit is right. Personal attacks are never the right thing to do, and especially more so with people we often disagree with -it brings you on the wrong side. You can easily argue that his views are destructive without attacking the editor. --Cyclopiatalk 13:27, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK problem
Just finished up the GA review, not too much to work on. Canada Hky (talk) 23:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Hawks
Yeah, I wasn't really expecting that either, but anything that questions that status quo in hockey seems to get vehemently shot down, so I guess I shouldn't have been that surprised. I think everything is good with it now, I just need to find time to knock through the process today. Canada Hky (talk) 13:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Calgary Stampede article
I noticed you have been a contributor to Calgary Stampede, I not sure the proper procedure, but I was thinking it may be best to semi-protect this article for the duration of the stampede. The Calgary Stampede will be getting an abundance of press during this time, which could lead to added vandalism to the article during a high traffic period. Thanks for any help Mcmatter (talk) 17:09, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Shorty Green
Hi. I have a question regarding your DYK submission for
12:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Wikicup
I saw on the discussion page of the
Bain GA
I thought the same thing. Was looking over stuff, and saw it was pretty much a nomination away, and felt why not. Though I'm not going to take credit for it; this one is all yours, I'd just feel wrong taking credit for it. Kaiser matias (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello Resolute, the IP has once more 're-added' the A, to Lehtinen. GoodDay (talk) 18:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Brought IP's disruption to ANI. GoodDay (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
I've deleted the ANI report. I wont bother deleting my recent message to the IP, as he'll (once again) ignore it (like he ignored your warning). PS: It's still aggravating, to let the little 'bleepidy bleep' have his own way, though. GoodDay (talk) 00:32, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Big-4 League
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Bill Mosienko GA
On behalf of
DYK for Shorty Green
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Duke Keats
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Trent McCleary
DYK for Babe Siebert
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for George Hay (ice hockey)
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Concordia University College of Alberta listed as a University
Concordia University College of Alberta is listed as "has grown to become a university focusing primarily on undergraduate education" on the Association of Universities and Colleges in Canada directory, which may secure its inclusion in the Wikipedia article on list of Universities in Alberta. Alam1s (talk) 15:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Reviewing
I am considering reviewing good article nomanations and was wondering if you would give me some tips for reviewing. I took a look at some of your reviews and it's look confusing so some help would be brilliant, thanks. Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 18:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Bryan Hextall
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:04, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Just a couple more Q's
Sorry to bother you again, but I have a few more questions on reviewing and thanks for the last reply
- What does Prose mean? (referring to Wikipedia:Good article criteria, 1.a)
- I looked over some reviews and saw they were being rated by fail and pass symbols on each question of the criteria, and then at the end there is a overall rating, how do you work out the overall rating?
- Can reviews be done over time?
- How do you offically decide if the article passes or not?
- Does all the reviews have to start by rating by the criteria and then have a couple of paragraph's at the end?
Thanks, Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 18:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
P.S. I see your userpage is vandilised on a regular basis, I suggest you make your page semi-protected
My first GA review
I took your advice and revewed the Atlético Madrid, have a look and see what you think at Talk:Atlético Madrid/GA2 Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 19:51, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Copa Libertadores (GA Nominee)
I have finished every single issue brought up on the nomination but one (which would be changing something generally accepted in football). The arbitration comitee is already looking at my case since my ban was motivated more by personal reasons.
Either way, it is finished. 68.219.42.11 (talk) 22:19, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hello. Thanks for promoting the page! It has long deserved it. I would like to ask one more thing: could you skim through the page again (it doesn't have to be extremely detailed if you don't have time). I would like to know if the page currently has potential to become a FA. I have done more improvements and expanded the page somemore. Thanks! 68.215.153.143 (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
I've reviewed the article and the review is here. I've placed it on hold, but it's a really nice article and there are no major issues. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Trent McCleary
nominate ) 00:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AFC Asian Cup winnersTemplate:AFC Asian Cup winners has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:48, 4 August 2010 (UTC) Dan Bain passed GAThought I'd let you know that Dan Bain passed GA. Good work on it, as I really did nothing to the article except add a few pictures. Kaiser matias (talk) 18:08, 5 August 2010 (UTC) DYK for Phat Wilson
|