User talk:Richardatlarge

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading

speedy deletion

since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are

case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 10:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Collaboration of the Week

Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week page to participate! Thanks! Dr. Cash 17:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week

WP:FAC on September 10, 2007

.

Also, please visit

WP:RxCOTW to support other articles for the next COTW. Articles that have been nominated thus far include Doxorubicin, Paracetamol (in the lead with 4 support votes so far), Muscle relaxant, Ethanol, and Bufotenin

.

In other news:

featured status on August 31, 2007
.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology main page has been updated and overhauled, to make it easier to find things, as well as to highlight other goals and announcements for the project.

GA status
.

ongoing
regarding the current wording of MEDMOS on including dosage information in drug articles. All input is welcome.

Dr. Cash 00:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pharmacology Update

Here's a brief update in some of the recent developments of WikiProject Pharmacology!

FA
status.

Good article criteria
? Please stop by the article and help improve it.

featured status. This is quite a fascinating compound. If you can, please stop by its discussion page
and leave comments in support of it.

Please remember that
talkheader
}} may be added to the top of talk pages, reminding users of the purpose of such pages. Additionally, unsigned comments and comments by anonymous users that are inappropriate may be removed from talk pages without being considered vandalism.

There was an interesting article on ZDNet last week about
inkjet printers to be used in transdermal patches to deliver a time-controlled release of drugs to patients. This information could be added to articles such as route of administration or drug delivery
.

You are receiving this message because you are listed as one of the participants of WikiProject Pharmacology.

Dr. Cash 04:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pharmacology Update

Here are a few updates in the realm of

WikiProject Pharmacology

:

The Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week has been changed to
featured quality
than articles worked on for only a week or two.

The current
featured article criteria
.

WP:FAC
and review the article.

Featured Article, having been promoted on October 8, 2007
.

Good Article status, but not promoted. Please see the full review full review
here for details.

Dr. Cash 22:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred R. Lindesmith

Wanted to let you know as a courtesy that I removed the Category:American psychologists from the Lindesmith article. While Lindesmith made contributions to the field of social psychology, he did so as a sociologist. I had Lindesmith as a professor in the 1960s and got to know him personally. He was kind and congenial, with a voice a lot like that of Studs Terkel. I wanted to start this article myself, but I kept putting it off. Glad you got it launched. I'm not sure that I could do justice to the technical aspects of his work. --Cuppysfriend (talk) 17:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)

Get free access to research!

Research tools and services

Outreach

Get involved

Get free access to sources
Read the Books & Bytes newsletter
Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers
Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar
Teach Library Interns
Become a Coordinator
Learn about TWL

...Support Open Access...

Cochrane Collaboration

is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!

If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and

sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 19:59, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Alfred R. Lindesmith.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alfred R. Lindesmith.jpg, which you've attributed to http://wayback.archive.org/web/20070227104228/http://home.earthlink.net/~hsbecker/picturepage.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
) at the site of the original publication; or

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
OTRS pending
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

Stefan2 (talk) 22:49, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard DeGrandpre (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Crunchydillpickle were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hey Richardatlarge! Thanks for the submission. The main reason I can't accept this as-is is that is lacks in-line citations. You should have a citation after every major piece of info. I added some

WP:AUTOBIO

. Let me know if you have any questions! Thanks,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard DeGrandpre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 01:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richardatlarge! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 01:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]