User talk:Ronhjones/Archive 2

Delivered by

How do I..

What do you mean by source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.109.87.202 (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

A link to where the data that is added, can be verified - see

WP:BLP for living people  Ronhjones  ^(Talk)

21:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

You may confirm my identity at my Email address, [email protected].

Thank you for your cooperation,

Kawther Salam, http://www.kawther.info http://www.kawther.info/wpr http://www.kawther.info/ga2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.178.161.83 (talk) 22:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

I do not have any deletion power. No one owns a page in Wikipedia, and anyone is free to add data (with references) to it. If a page has been created, then I doubt if it will be deleted unless it is factually incorrect. I suggest you refer to

WP:BLPHELP for more information.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk)

23:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

I ought to have included an edit summary, but it's a bad and bitey idea to revert anonymous contributions that remove redundant information. Yours, 90.197.107.184 (talk) 22:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Already replied on user's page  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem, patrolling is hasty work. Best wishes, 90.197.107.184 (talk) 23:00, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

This article previously contained several "rosy" terms, subjective reasoning, and punctuation errors not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. The present article has been revised so that all rosy terms have been removed, subjective reasoning has been replaced with statements of facts describing the subject, and punctuation errors and run-on sentences improved by a re-organized page. Those editors who have attempted to revert the article back to a previous version have been advised to consult with the discussion page for guidance on editing, but have refused to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxsmart10 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

If the page gets locked then all parties will have to discuss.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Easy Goer......This page stated facts on fastest running times with the horses who ran the faster times in the races provided(Secretariat, Seattle Slew, Devil's Bag, Tri Jet, General Assembly) Take a look at the Sunday Silence article and you will see. And also, on the Belmont Stakes article, it says the Belmont Stakes is known as the "test of the champion." Also, providing what his progeny did on the race track are facts. The rosy terms are not rosy, they are simply stating that the margin of victory was a large margin and surprising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Textwiki132 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Don't discuss it me with. You need to discuss the content on the talk page and come to a consensus. I have just suggested that you all leave the page alone until the consensus is reached.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:49, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

The IP was correct, somehow the info got in there twice and they were removing the dup data. I was looking at it to revert, too, till I figured out what they were doing.  :) Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:48, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Sometimes I wich an edit summary was compulsory.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Completely agree. But then most times they'd just put in a string of nonsense characters just to get around the reqiurement. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

I've reported the thing on the 3RR noticeboard. This needs to stop. Between the two of us, I think we've warned all of the participants.  :) Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Fully agree. I did consider 3RR noticeboard, but a report takes some filling in! and

WP:HG was clicking away with new edits!  Ronhjones  ^(Talk)

23:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

You just got reverted. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

And used Twinkle to sort it out.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

The "discussion" on the Talk page doesn't look encouraging. It's a good idea to keep an eye out when the protection lapses. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh, dear. I do hope we are not going to get a repeat of last night, 24h protection might just be not enough... Looks like there's 2.5h or so to liftoff... (That will be 1am here, almost my bedtime). If they start, I doubt if warnings would make much difference - I did note when I first applied the 3RR template that one logged in user "stopped", only to be replaced by an IP address - I would wager they are one and the same, and he didn't want his main account blocked. If we see them starting then I suggest

WP:RPP for a longer block, and let the admins take over, us mere mortals can do no more.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk)

21:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I had to issue v4 warnings to two of the participants (one of them a suspiciously new account), but neither of them has edited the article since then. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 18:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

They are probably assuming that we are watching. Maybe they will leave it alone for a while - trouble is, if one starts pushing their POV in editing, then we could be back to square one.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:23, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

I see your nomination for speedy deletion of the category listing showing the various agencies that represent this profession worldwide. I also understand that you purport that the substantial content was of YOUR authorship and that qualifies you to recommend its deletion? May I inquire as to your qualifications regarding the subject matter? As I was the founder of the World Governing Body for Sports Chiropractic, and have been involved in all aspects of its development around the planet since 1978, and have never had the pleasure of making your acquaintance.

Dr. Press —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drsjpdc (talk • contribs) 22:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I made a small error...

1. You may note I removed the speedy some 8 minutes before your message here
2. I never claimed authourship - the message you saw was Tagging page for speedy deletion, blanked or requested by creator (HG), which is a standard message generated by
   Wikipedia:SD#G7
   speedy template.
3. I saw that the page was created by "Drsjpdc" and then blanked some 5 hours later by the same user, thus I called up the G7 template routine, assuming it was not required anymore.
4. I later realized the error - in that a Category page can be blank and still work, so I tidied it up.

Hope that helps.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:34, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Dear Ronhjones,

I am new in Wikipedia. Can you help me to create the new page?

Pinhao is first used to call the Araucaria seeds. Because of the seeds, some people used this name in rivers and cities. So the seeds are the most important meaning of pinhao.

I do not know how to create the page to do this links. But this information about the pinhao is very important.

Thank you,

Daniel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drlammel (talk • contribs) 11:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

he clearly is a professional pie eater why did you change back??

he takes part in in food eating contests professionally with pie eating team mates mark viduka and frank lampard jnr

please can you reinstate my edit thanks

No - Unreferenced data - see

WP:BLP  Ronhjones  ^(Talk)

21:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello. I rewrote Ethanol and added a reference point. Hope it works. Aptak (talk) 22:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

OK, I'd like to know what water solubility has to do with pipeline transport.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

That is a very good question! Water and water vapors are present in modern fuel pipelines in minor quantities. Ethanol attracts water. If you attempt to transport ethanol over long enough distances, you end up having a cocktail of ethanol and water at the end of the pipe - a mixture that cannot be used as fuel, unless you separate the two substances. It is a well known phenomenon, and a big problem for the ethanol industry. Aptak (talk) 23:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I see, and probably because they would go for a cheap option that uses a pipeline material that in not impermeable to water! Thanks for the detail.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Here is a link that explains all better. [6]Aptak (talk) 23:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for that link, I'll have a read tomorrow.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for helping revert all of that vandalism on my userpage. It's amazing that I didn't have to revert any of it because you and a few other people kept beating me to it. --TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 23:46, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

No problem, always happy to help.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:47, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Just wanted to check with you about this edit you made: [7] It seems you deleted my warning to the user, and I think you did it by accident, but just wanted to check if it was for another reason? ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

As far as I know it's an occasional

WP:HG bug. I've heard about, but it's never happened to me before. Feel free to re-instate any deletion.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk)

00:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Gotcha. I've reinstated it. Thanks! ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:06, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

And I've logged the edit at

Wikipedia:Huggle/Feedback#New_page_edit_conflict_resulted_in_owerwrite  Ronhjones  ^(Talk)

00:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

He is pretty fit for a ginger, though. I'd shag him. Although he'd have to wash his hands first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.15.41.187 (talk) 22:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

That's your view and you are entitled to it. But it's not suitable to add to Wikipedia.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:46, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

its not been officially confirmed, please take it down immediately or I will report it to someone more senior on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.55.102 (talk) 23:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

The page title is Colonial Masses, therefore the infobox has to agree. If you are sure that the article is incorrect then you must request deletion of the page by adding the appropriate

WP:CSD to the top of the article. I would suggest a {{db-g3}} in that case. Then the merits (or not) can be discussed on the talk page.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk)

23:58, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

OK. thank you for replying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.55.102 (talk) 00:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

N5iln has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Alan (talk) 21:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, I love biscuits, especially this type.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks man. Yeah, I wasn't sure if it was true or not but my mate Ewan said it was true and he's a pretty solid guy so i thought "i'd better put it in just to be safe" but i guess you lot need like a citation or summat so i'mma find a reliable source for you guys. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.54.70.64 (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

A citation would be the normal way of adding some data.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! For reverting my talk page :). Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 23:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

No problem, ISTR you have done the same on my user page :-)  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi there RONHJONES, VASCO here,

Ty very much for your assistance in dealing with this poor excuse for an editor (as seen here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Julio_Salinas&action=history); i reported him once and he did not like it one bit. Since, he tends to edit - with a seemingly neverending supply of IPs - in articles in which i worked in mere hours/days before, writing all kind of lies/foul language. Charming...

Thanks once again, have a nice weekend from Portugal (will this "user" also vandalize this message? He could),

VASCO AMARAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 14:45, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. Always happy to assist in reverting bad edits. Sadly that IP is owned by "Tiscali (UK)" who I know do use dynamic addressing, so every time time they log on - they get a new IP number.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Could you have a look at the recent edits to this article. I do not want to get to the "three edits and you're out" stage with User:87.12.240.215 - but I think he/she needs stopping before further rubbish is posted here, or elsewhere. Can you assist ? Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 13:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I see what you mean. I've added it to my watch list. I've added an ISP template to their talk page - the resolved host name would suggest a static address. If so, they may not continue to press their own POV, as they could get too many warnings and get a block.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:45, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Some people clearly have nothing better to do than to coordinate stupid offsite attacks. Thank you SO much for assisting me with that idiot on my talk page.  :) --

My pleasure. I like the fact that it must have taken some time to set up that vandalism, and I reverted it and warned him with one single press of the "Q" key in

WP:HG :-)  Ronhjones  ^(Talk)

19:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you to respect the information... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.9.195.124 (talk) 22:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

I never said there was no reference - the message said you deleted content (with references) without explanation - that is vandalism  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

KKCK is a top 40 station with a recognized modern rock lean to the music mix. I'm adding factual information to clarify the angle of the format. NeutralHomer appears to have a serious problem like this and continues to revert my one sentence edit. The assertion I make is obvious by the station's playlist but I don't cite that as a separate link because the station is already linked to on the page. Please stop undoing a perfectly honest, truthful addition that describes this radio station. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.101.226.27 (talk) 23:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

I know nothing about "NeutralHomer" - I saw a non referenced addition - one can always use a named reference to add a duplicate source.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:22, 15 September 2009 (UTC)