User talk:Roseirena

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Roseirena, and

! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Be kind to others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 18:46, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

July 2019

. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. robertsky (talk) 17:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

TV articles

Thankyou for your contributions but when creating TV articles, please use a properly formatted, fresh version of {{Infobox television}} rather than something that you appear to have copied from somewhere else. Quite aside from being virtually impossible to read because of the way it was formatted, the infobox you used at Anak Langit and Cahaya Terindah contained numerous errors including fields that have not existed in the infobox for several years. There were extensive changes needed to both articles to bring them up to a minimum acceptable standard.[1][2] --AussieLegend (✉) 10:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Roseirena, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to

issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is
  Wikipedia:Copy-paste
  .
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:48, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comply with the request that I made above regarding TV articles. Like your previous efforts, Dunia Terbalik contains multiple errors that require a lot of work to fix. By continuing to recreate articles like this you are disrespecting other editors by deliberately creating sub-standard articles that you apparently expect other editors to fix. You need to learn what is expected of articles, what policies they need to comply with and ensure that articles that you create do not contain extensive errors. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:22, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@AussieLegend: If I may chime in... I was looking at at articles created by Roseirena. Many are direct translations from Wiki ID articles, which may not match the contribution standards and rigours of Wiki EN. @Roseirena: Harap memperbaiki terjemahan yang dibuat oleh Google Translate. (That's my limits at Malay, and Google Translate. Oh the irony.) Please understand that there is a different, if not higher, threshold of contribution standards which Wikipedia EN has as compared to Wikipedia ID. Direct translations of articles from Wikipedia ID (or anywhere in fact. I have helped on a Chinese to English translation for a Taiwanese TV series, and it is still in the Draftspace.) is not a reason enough to keep the articles as they are in Wikipedia English. Please heed the advices of AussieLegend: clean up on the translations, convert Templates as necessary, update wikilinks, include more reputable sources, etc. robertsky (talk) 05:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

• When an article with problems has been moved to draft space, do not move it back to article space until the identified problems have been fixed. As explained above, Dunia Terbalik had significant errors that required correction before it was at a minimum acceptable statndard. When moving articles, if the desired target is not available, do not move to any old target. TV articles need to be named in accordance with
  WP:NCTV and "soap opera" is NOT appropriate disambiguation. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:55, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

An article you recently created,

]

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dunia Terbalik (soap opera), you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 04:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Please see the warning above regarding this. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:58, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jin Se-yeon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kenny htv (talk) 14:25, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to

.)

Rumah Pilkada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to English and Indonesian

Rumah Pemilu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to English

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indonesian companies established in 2020, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 09:12, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indonesian streaming companies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 09:13, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Roseirena. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Roseirena. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Roseirena|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:08, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

]

A tag has been placed on

disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the

see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:28, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

An article you recently created,

]

A tag has been placed on

, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:15, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roseirena. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's

requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's

required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have

.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --

]

Category:Kla Project albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 16:28, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot overrule a close of an AFD. If you want to challenge the close, go to

]

I'd like to add that the message you left on

]

File copyright problem with File:Titlecard 86.png

Thank you for uploading

and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the

]

Television infoboxes again

How many times do you have to be asked before you produce articles with correct infoboxes? Yet again, with 86 (TV series) you have failed to comply with polite requests, expecting somebody else to fix your mistakes. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 17:07, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mz7 (talk) 19:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Roseirena (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

First of all, I'm id.wiki user, that trying to help her. Dimas anggara is definitly not her account, Dimas anggara is a male and Roseirene is a female. So, she tells me that her account was hacked, it's not her fault, she don't want to do it, for her an account is enough. I hope you unblock this person, because she is a great contributor for Wikipedia.Mnafisalmukhdi1 (talk) 07:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

1) We don't allow proxy unblock requests. 2) How would you know this is true? Where did she tell you? 3) If her account was hacked, why does she need to not do what again? We do not unblock compromised accounts.-- Dlohcierekim 08:20, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Roseirena (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Dlohcierekim, 1) I don't use proxy. Maybe it's my browser fault. 2) Again, i know her wouldn't do that. She tells me on Facebook, to me and to Indonesia Wikipedia User Group. 3) I think she don't know what to do, so she ask me for helping her getting back her account. Mnafisalmukhdi1 (talk) 04:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests made by users other than the blocked user will not be actioned. Indeed, in cases of sockpupptery, such unblock requests considerably decrease the likelihood of the account being unblocked. Yunshui ^雲_水 06:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

commenting here as an interested party. Mnafisalmukhdi1 proxy here means on behalf. You are making the request on behalf of somebody. It is something which the admins here don't entertain. She should be the one requesting. If her account is hacked, please refer to Regaining account access for information. robertsky (talk) 04:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GAB. (BTW. Here on English Wikipedia, we take a dim view of discussing Wikipedia matters off-Wiki.) -- Dlohcierekim 07:56, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Annnnd. Her editing pattern from the start has indicators of

WP:UPE.-- Dlohcierekim 08:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

RE: prior block on Sock Puppet and possible more IPs being used

Notifying Yunshui who placed the block on this account, and Mz7 who notified of a sock puppet here, since I don't know the procedure of reporting this.

Two more IP editors: User talk:140.213.40.180 and User talk:111.94.241.18 have been asking the same question about date formating on South Korean articles to multiple editors, as this blocked account for User:Roseirena and making edits that have been reverted with reasons provided to them.

You can see the questions and responses at their Talk pages and Talk pages here: User talk:Kenny htv#Ask to you the Date format, User talk:Alexanderlee#South Korean Figures like US Figures ?, User talk:Amakuru#The South Korean articles like US articles, User talk:Bonnielou2013#South Korean article on Wikipedia like US articles ?, and User talk:Explicit#South Korean article on Wikipedia like US articles ?.

I am also pinging editors who have been questioned by these IPs, just in case: Kenny htv, Alexanderlee, Amakuru, Explicit. Thank you,--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 18:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonnielou2013: For reporting, you can turn on Twinkle in your Gadgets settings. This will simplify the reporting process for you. After turning on Twinkle, on the IP's talk page, you select TW > ARV, then select Sockpuppet under Report type. You should trace back to the original sockpuppeteer (which can be done by checking the block notice on the top) and key in the sock's username. robertsky (talk) 02:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Robertsky for the information.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 02:11, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]