User talk:Rossen4

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's

I have started a discussion at Talk:Modern Buddhism so that you can explain why you are making the changes. Please comment there. Singularity42 (talk) 01:02, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! I noticed that you have never used edit summaries in your entire 5 years on Wikipedia. This can be considered disruptive editing, and contrary to the collaborative spirit of Wikipedia. Singularity42 (talk) 01:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Rossen4's conduct. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 13:32, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rossen, After Singularity left the above notes on your talkpage, you have continued editing, but haven't responded here, or on the talkpage of Modern Buddhism. That gives me the idea that you either not reading the messages on your talkpage, or are unwilling to discuss differences. That makes me concerned you may be pushing your own view through, which would go in to the collaborative project Wikipedia is. I would appreciate it if you could comment here, to avoid things getting out of hand. Regards, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:10, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rossen4: I simply deleted a doubled link. The link in the third entry of the page went to the same page as the link in the second entry of the page. I didn't actually delete any info. Just removed the second instance of the same link.

Rossen4, thank you for responding. I now understand your edit, and have no issue with it. Please in the future, use edit summaries, especially when another editor is challenging your edits. That would have avoided this from escalating in the first place. Singularity42 (talk) 20:40, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Avici (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to

Sutras

Nalanda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Lotus

Nam(u) Myōhō Renge Kyō (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Japanese

Soka Gakkai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Betty Williams

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lhalung Pelgyi Dorje, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahima Dharma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dhenkanal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Negrito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Onge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Darkesthoursoflife († • ©) 15:27, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manhattan Bridge Loop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lau Gar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Grandmaster and Shaolin

Yangshao culture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Longshan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Condoleezza Rice. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bandua

added a link pointing to Reo

Continental Celtic languages

added a link pointing to Lusitanian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lau Gar has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

The article Date with IKEA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails

WP:GNG

. NB The "reference" merely confirms the album exists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 21:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

please don't delete referenced information without proving it is false of irrelevant. -M.Altenmann >t 06:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

]

Proposed deletion of Gerold Braunmühl

The article Gerold Braunmühl has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 19:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gerold Braunmühl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swabian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rossen4. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Danish phonology

added a link pointing to Danish

Stød

added a link pointing to Danish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laothoe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stratonice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rossen4. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jayadratha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Barkeep49. I noticed that you recently removed content from Vajrakilaya without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry investigation

You are suspected of

sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rossen4. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doanri (talk • contribs) 14:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Content on flag of Tibet

Hi! I just wanted to apologise about the reversal of your edits on flag of Tibet. What you said in the SPI is correct, the linked war was indeed not the one the article should've referred to. I might have got a bit too revert-happy on China-related articles because of my experiences on other pages (like Amazing China). It is of course my responsibility to make sure that I'm not reverting good additions of content (like yours), but I would still like to ask you to consider using the edit summary a bit more often, to explain yourself and to avoid situations like this one. Sorry for the mess! Doanri (talk) 18:52, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"but I would still like to ask you to consider using the edit summary a bit more often, to explain yourself and to avoid situations like this one." That's certainly a good idea. Sorry for not using it. I'll remember to do so in the future. Thanks.

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

Marichi temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marici (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

White Helmets (Syrian Civil War) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection

.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. VQuakr (talk) 00:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for a self-revert, and a note about BRD

Hello, I have recently been following your contributions at

WP:BRD, in which discussions take place to determine if there is a consensus to add objected to content to an article. Given that multiple editors have contested to the content you have been adding, I would like to request that you self-revert your recent edit so that a discussion can talk place on the relevant talk page. If you have any questions of me, feel free to ask. Best.--SamHolt6 (talk) 00:54, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A

Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here

.

uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here

. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Stikkyy t/c 04:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's worth noting that you've went 5RR already in 24 hours. It's your content that you're adding, and if it's attracting opposition, I reckon the onus is on you to try to communicate with others and to argue your own point besides slapping your own "verified" stamp on contentious sources. Stikkyy t/c 04:17, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rossen4. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Angela Minervini

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 03:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buddhism in Vietnam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 15:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changes and removal of sources at Indra

I have no idea why you did this - you know you should be using edit summaries and agreed to use them - and can't imagine a justification, so I've reverted you. Doug Weller talk 15:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gandavyuha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buddhabhadra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Aśvaka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Beira and Ora

Prambanan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Nandi and Kala

Battle of Saraighat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mir Jumla

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:23, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prambanan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nandi and Kala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 00:46, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zo people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuki.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ksudraka Agama

Hello Rossen4,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ksudraka Agama for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 10:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Āgama (Buddhism) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samyukta Agama moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Concern regarding Draft:Samyukta Agama

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 21:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kubera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bishamon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samyukta Agama

Hello, Rossen4. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samyukta Agama

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Purgaz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Slavic and Ruthenian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Warning

You've been an editor long enough to know that serious BLP claims must have good sources. DailyMail is not reliable and depreciated on Wikipedia. Youtube is usually not reliable unless it's from a reliable outlet (eg NYT). Business Insider is questionable per

WP:RSP. Stop adding contentious information without consensus and good sources. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Contentious Topics notification

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

EvergreenFir (talk) 04:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Alexandra Cousteau. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used Virginia Roberts' memoir. That is a primary source. How is that poorly referenced? Rossen4 (talk) 02:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Court documents are

WP:SIGCOV. Generally we don't include accusations, only convictions, unless there's wide coverage from good sources (e.g., Bill Cosby or Dan Schneider). EvergreenFir (talk) 03:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited August Ames, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tweet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stoya, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]