User talk:SU Linguist

Hello, SU Linguist, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Again, welcome!  MJHankel 05:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar! --Tickkid 16:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia. Could you also please consider using our vandal warning system [1]? First offenses get a "test1," then a "test2," followed by a "test3" and "test4." At the end of this, if the vandal persists, he or she merits blocking for a period of time. If you do this, it will greatly help us in decreasing vandalism on Wikipedia. Much thanks, -- Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 00:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, from what I remember, you didn't have over 250 edits when your application was viewed, so that will be why you weren't approved. Add your name to the list again, and you should pass. Ale_Jrb^talk 17:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, SU Linguist! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply

Your vandal guard keeps reverting my edits to this, and other San Diego area pages. The demographics that are referenced here are not by a legitamate website. If they are not by Census, or another recognizable group, then they need to be discredited. The city o San Diego has not even strictly defined these areas, so it would not even be accurate to give this area demographics. I think that the website that links here gives an estimation to what they "think" the demographics are, but without any proof by census, or the City of San Diego, they need to be removed. 69.236.27.110 04:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The source on demographics is from

Christopher Mann McKay 17:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

As it is, your very welcome regarding the revert...Service with a smile! Lradrama 19:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting my UserPage. I didn't even notice. Thanks a lot. User:TheaterMarine

Thank you kindly for reverting the vandalism on my userpage - especially since I was preoccupied reporting that individual on the AIV page. ;) I truly appreciate your help. Take care, --Mary quite contrary ^(hai?) 02:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did not vandalise that page, as in NZ our IPs change as they are not static, so it would be someone on XTRA that edited that page who had that IP at that time. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tulip&diff=next&oldid=123677350)

Thanks for the cookie - it's lunchtime and everything! Wombatcat 16:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WikiThanks.pngThank you for the barnstar! Herostratus 21:59, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage! Much appreciated :)

xC | ☎ 07:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Andrew, for commenting on my RfA, which closed successfully with a tally of 76/0/1! I hope I will meet your expectations, and be sure I will continue trying to be a good editor as well as a good administrator :) If I may be of any assistance to you in the future (or if you see me commit some grievous error :), please drop me a line on my Talk page. Again, thank you, and happy editing! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't warn vandals with a last warning if they have not been properly warned with a test1, test2, etc. In reference to

I have never seen anything which says that warning levels should begin anew each day.

WP:Vandal#Warnings says that warning templates "are listed at right in order of severity, but need not be used in succession." If there is another policy somewhere, could you show it to me? SU Linguist 22:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

A final warning is just that--a final warning. If there hasn't been a previous warning, then one can't issue a last warning because they haven't been properly notified. In regards to time, multiple users often share IP addresses so the vandalism done 10 days ago could have been done by a different user. Let's say the final warning was issued 10 days ago and he vandalized today, surely he would not be blocked for that piece of vandalism 10 days ago. Each new day, the warnings do not start anew. But with time lapses of 3 or more days, it is best to start over. Also, in certain cases, it may be necessary to issue a final warning as the first warning; however, that is reserved for very strong vandalism (calling another user on wikipedia a "retard" does not merit a final warning though). I hope that made sense, it can be kind of tricky. Keep up the excellent work and let me know if you have any other questions! Cheers!

es2221 22:26, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Many thanks for awarding me The Barnstar of High Culture! How on earth did you come across my contributions?!! Chesdovi 11:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support in my recent, unsuccessful RfA. It's much appreciated. IvoShandor 16:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Burnside carbine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--Yomangani^talk 12:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I dunno where you showed up from or how you found me. I mean, how did you even end up going through my talk page??? Anyways, I'm glad to have received a barn star for random acts of kindness - it coming at a time when some edits of mine to an article are being disputed. Lightens the load. Thanks a lot! And that too - from a fellow believer. Btw, if you're interested in Christian music or anything related to that, I'd request a lil help on the Christian music portal. That'll be all for now. Happy wiki-ing!!! aJCfreak yAk 18:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It will of course be displayed on my user page with great pride. I've always dream of a day someone would award me an obese barn-squirrel, imagine my surprise when I found out that today is the day. Thank you very much. :-D daveh4h 18:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you take another look at the Collateralized debt obligation, I think the person after me made a typo and not a deliberate vandalism. Thanks. Finnancier 15:50, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you were right. I should have looked at the his last edits, too, which were clearly not vandalism. Thanks for catching that, and I changed it back. SU Linguist 15:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind award. I do my best to work on the Fred Craddock article. Joeraybray 04:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry, eh? I'm a

]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikiproject Christianity! Thank you for joining. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Getting Started General • Task for You Wikiproject Talk Page • Templates Useful Links Project Category List of Christian Topics Christianity Portal Sign up for the Newsletter Miscellaneous Featured Articles • Good Articles Did You Know? • Forums Work Groups Anabaptist Work Group • Core Topics Work Group Iglesia ni Cristo Work Group • Jesus Work Group Outreach Work Group Projects Article Requests • Destubbing Campaign Assessment • Articles Needing Clean-up Peer Review • Adopted Topics Similar WikiProjects Calvinism Catholicism • Lutheranism

~ Wikihermit 16:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SU Linguist, I appreciate the "heads up" as to editing. Elaneros 17:19, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My first reverting-related barnstar! Thanks so much! --Hasek is the best 03:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ged UK (talk) 20:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SmackBot

Thanks for that. Shows how easy it is to be tripped up, people were dating clean-up tags with seasons, and I put the season to month conversion in the same place as the month spelling errors. Of course it needs to be specific to clean-up tags only. Rich Farmbrough, 23:05 4 November 2008 (UTC).

Re:Your question at

WP:RFF

I have posted a response

vecia 19:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Possibly unfree File:Milt Campbell at Civitan Clinic.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Milt Campbell at Civitan Clinic.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jujutacular ^talk 19:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disciple Now for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disciple Now is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disciple Now until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:08, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Beeson Divinity School.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Junior Civitan logo small.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]