User talk:Sagflaps

You have recently edited a page related to the

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

Hi Sagflaps! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 15:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sagflaps, please note that I have unvanished your previous account, Morphdog, per

This is fine, that old account didn't have any sanctions, restrictions, etc, and I didn't do anything particularly controversial or that could be considered socking. Sagflaps (talk) 21:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of Richard T. Burke.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that you cannot edit AI articles until you have 500 edits. Thanks. Selfstudier (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:ARBECR is what you are talking about specifically here), you know where to go. Sagflaps (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

You know the rules, stick to them. Selfstudier (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier: What I mean is, if you want to argue that extended confirmed means something other than just having the user group, you will probably have to go to arbitration to debate that. Sagflaps (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for your help in making pages more globally orientated Stix1776 (talk) 01:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Good point, well made. ——Serial 11:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That guy on YouTube made one valid point about the page, and I fixed it. However, I would appreciate if you never make such postings on my talk page in a future. There is a lot of garbage on the internet.

@My very best wishes: Fair enough, I just was not sure if you were aware of this video or not. Sagflaps (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was not. There are many people who worship USSR. I do agree with him that the quality of many WP pages, including that one, is low. But there is only so much we can do. My very best wishes (talk) 18:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@My very best wishes: Do you think moving the article name to mention human rights violations is fair? The article pretty much only mentions violations, and as someone who isn't a USSR worshipper, I wouldn't be able to tell the difference if the name were changed given the current contents. Sagflaps (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, of course not. For example, one could say that page Human rights in North Korea is also mostly about human rights violations. Yes, we do not have page Human rights in Nazi Germany, but I think that one would be closer to North Korea. My very best wishes (talk) 19:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair the North Korea article has a section called Position of the DPRK, which the USSR article does not. Sagflaps (talk) 19:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It does. This is Human_rights_in_the_Soviet_Union#Soviet_concept_of_human_rights_and_legal_system. My very best wishes (talk) 20:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1]. Please note that my edit had nothing to do with any AfD. As about

 Done Sagflaps (talk) 19:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@My very best wishes: Ah, and I did not mean to wikihound you on this. I was just looking through what you had changed on the Soviet Union article, and got a little distracted. It was only one edit anyways Sagflaps (talk) 22:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you! And you are welcome to fix this page about USSR or any other page. But when you are following someone only to revert their edit that does not need to be reverted on the page that you never edited before, that does not look good. Please keep this in mind. My very best wishes (talk) 02:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate

I didn't realize you had been granted ECR, apologies. Selfstudier (talk) 16:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Clarification request you filed has been closed. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 15:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]