User talk:Samshersinghbeniyaaz

Hello, Samshersinghbeniyaaz, and

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sam Sailor ^Sing 11:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Don't Quit Youngistaan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability guideline for film-related articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sam Sailor ^Sing 11:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Saied Mohammed Ali, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.tesfanews.net/three-new-mathematical-theorems-discovered-by-eritrean-high-school-student/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

The article Don't quit... youngistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability according to Wikipedia:Notability (films). Can't find any mention of it online apart from the film makers' website.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ruby Murray 06:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don't quit... youngistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't quit... youngistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ruby Murray 09:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• The article has been userfied to User:Samshersinghbeniyaaz/Don't Quit Youngistaan per the outcome of the AfD discussion. --Randykitty (talk) 14:20, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Saied Mohammed Ali, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Ruby Murray 10:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely sorry.I am new here so I didnt knew of this.I will take care in future.

) 12:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• BLP sources|dateMarch 2014}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gourov Dasgupta for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Knyzna1 (talk) 15:27, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neeraj Shrivastava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ruby Murray 07:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Samshersinghbeniyaaz, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Samshersinghbeniyaaz, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Ruby Murray 12:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neeraj Shrivastava is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeraj Shrivastava until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Sailor ^Sing 15:40, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Samshersinghbeniyaaz, your rationale for deleting PAGER is that a detailed page already exists. Where is that page? RockMagnetist (talk) 15:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined this request because user talk pages are not normally deleted, see

If you want more than that, and you are leaving Wikipedia permanently, see Wikipedia:Courtesy vanishing for what you can do. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:54, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by