User talk:Scaufape

The article Gerard Roca has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hola SCAUFAPE, VASCO desde Portugal al habla,

Perdona por mis maneras en mis cambios en "HONOURS" en UE Lleida, ya he hecho algunos otros cambios. Sin embargo, todavía creo que en los títulos no hace falta poner "WINNERS", se da por hecho, solo poner "RUNNER-UP" en caso de segundo lugar (y solo en copas, nunca en liga, eso no se contabiiza).

Un saludo cordial, buen fin de semana - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:33, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Scaufape. I was working this last month in a project of

Gonzaka (talk) 09:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced

The article

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

Si estás dispuesto a hacerlo contéstame y empezamos. Mil gracias. Qampunen (talk) 08:16, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

¿Te parece bien desde el 11 hasta el 18? Yo haré del 1 al 4 y del 7 al 10. El otro usuario hará los grupos 5 y 6. Es preferible que los actualicemos el mismo día si podemos, y si no pues cuando podamos preferiblemente antes de que pasen demasiados días. No es necesario que pongamos la diferencia de goles (bastante tenemos con tener actualizada la tercera división). Mil gracias por tu colaboración. Allá vamos... Qampunen (talk) 16:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Si tienes algún problema con las tablas no dudes en consultarme. Por cierto, ya no tienes por qué actualizar el grupo XI. Tus grupos son desde el 12 hasta el 18 (7 grupos). Saludos.Qampunen (talk) 22:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fantástico, crack! Creo que con el trabajo colectivo seremos muy eficientes. Buen trabajo! Qampunen (talk) 22:05, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cuando termines de actualizar las tablas (si eres el último en hacerlo) cambias la fecha de "last updated" en el artículo. Qampunen (talk) 21:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Te he editado el grupo XV de hoy por si estabas ocupado. Muchas gracias por el gran trabajo que estás haciendo. Qampunen (talk) 21:06, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mira, la página www.futbolme.com está sin actualizar así que te he puesto los resultados del grupo XII por si no lo actualizan hoy:

• Corralejo 2-1 Tirajafe
• Realejos 2-0 Vera
• Mensajero 0-3 Villa Sta. Brígida
• Atl. Granadilla 4-0 Orientación Marítima
• Victoria 2-1 Pájara Playas de Jandía Qampunen (talk) 17:55, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Como ha pasado un día y seguro que estás ocupado porque es Navidad (fechas ocupadas) te he actualizado el grupo 12 y 15 de ayer, pues no eran demasiados partidos. Por cierto, ¿vas a poder editar el grupo XV el día 30 ó 31? Si no puedes, puedes contar conmigo ese día ya que es raro editar un 31. Gracias por tu trabajo, Scaufape! Qampunen (talk) 10:44, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tranquilo, no hay problema. Un saludo y enhorabuena por la goleada del Lleida :) Qampunen (talk) 21:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No tengo Internet en mi ordenador personal, por lo que ahora mismo no podré editar. Espero arreglarlo lo antes posible. ¿Podrías ayudarme a actualizar la Segunda B esta jornada? (La Tercera es demasiado y ya tienes bastante con tus grupos, así que mis grupos de Tercera los actualizaré cuando me sea posible). Un saludo, amigo! Qampunen (talk) 11:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muchísimas gracias por ayudarme con la Segunda División B y la Copa Federación y por tu trabajo en Tercera División. ¿Vas a editar el partido de Tercera de mañana viernes? No he podido casi editar nada esta semana y sin embargo alguien ha actualizado los grupos míos y algunos tuyos (algo muy poco común). Nos ha ahorrado trabajo. Un saludo y suerte al Lleida :) Qampunen (talk) 21:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De acuerdo :) Es que es una tarea ardua. Suerte al Lleida. Qampunen (talk) 22:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Te echado una mano esta mañana porque seguro que tienes mucho trabajo. Un saludo, amigo. Qampunen (talk) 11:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, se metió el usuario Jolley algo, y empezó a actualizar la Tercera División. No sé si va a ser regular o no, pero te ha quitado trabajo :) Como sueles actualizar la Tercera los domingos por la noche, pues compruebas si tus grupos necesitan ser actualizados o no. Gracias, compañero! Qampunen (talk) 15:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gonzalo Eraso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer who fails

WP:ATHLETE

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, amigo. Cuánto tiempo. ¿Cómo te va? Pues mira, yo seguiría con el mismo artículo pero le cambiaría el nombre solamente (move the page) porque sólo le han cambiado el nombre ¿no? Yo hubiera hecho un artículo nuevo si el Lleida hubiese desaparecido y hubieran creado el nuevo equipo en Regional, pero como siguen en Segunda B sólo cambiaría el nombre. Aún así voy a consultarlo con otro usuario a ver qué piensa. Saludos y suerte para el Lleida la próxima temporada :) Qampunen (talk) 11:36, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He consultado con otro usuario y lo mejor es redirigir el articulo UE Lleida a Lleida 1939, así también como todos las categorias que tengan en el titulo UE Lleida, como por ejemplo, de UE Lleida footballers a Lleida 1939 footballers. Lo que ha sucedido es exactamente igual a lo de la SD Compostela. Hay que poner como fecha de fundación 1939 y al lado como reformado en 2011. Un saludo! Qampunen (talk) 17:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, al final el nombre de Lleida 1939 ha sido desestimado y el club se llamará Club Lleida Esportiu. Cámbialo tú mismo porque no veo donde puedo hacerlo, o me lo enseñas. Gracias crack!!! Scaufape (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! Tengo una duda para los puestos de Segunda B para acceder a la Copa del Rey. Casi siempre ha sido los cuatro mejores restantes (aparte de los cinco primeros de cada grupo). El año pasado dijeron que dos y sin embargo se clasificaron !5!. ¿Este año son dos o cuatro? Gracias! Qampunen (talk) 06:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks Scaufape for helping to promote give someone a pat on the back today. Sp33dyphil © • © 08:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi Scaufape, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:Scaufape/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful -

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky (talk …stalk!) 08:57, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simple references

These require two parts;

a)

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>

b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";

== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Scaufape/reftest and try it out.

Named references

Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Hi there Scaufape! I've just come across one of your articles, and noticed that you had to create titles for your url links manually, or were using bare urls as references.

You might want to consider using

]

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this month! 66.87.2.193 (talk) 16:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article José Javier Etxarri Sanz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player who fails

WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 09:14, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fernando Esparza Aizkorbe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player who fails

WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 09:15, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola SCAUFAPE, qué tal?

ya sé que no me vas a contestar (o me lo temo, y no sé que he hecho, yo creo que nada), pero ahí va: te pediría por favor mucho cuidado y ayuda con los "PC updates", las datas que aparecen en las cajas de los jugadores abajo (y "NT update" para los equipos nacionales). Se debe de cambiar el día quando hay partido (partido y gol por supuesto) no quando uno edita.

Los días del final de las temporadas pasadas en España fueron: 13 MAYO para

Gracias, buen rollo y buena semana - --AL (talk) 00:31, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Nada? OK. Pero una última cosa, has vuelto a poner el nombre del jugador de tu equipo como MOLO CASAS, y eso es incorrecto, así es mitad apodo y mitad nombre de pila. Con MOLO tenemos suficiente creo yo. --AL (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, perdona, no sabia estas normas. Scaufape (talk) 18:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• No hace pedir perdón hombre, faltaría más. Pero sí, esa norma ayuda a saber en que altura de la temporada vamos en cuanto a estadísticas se refiere (mucha gente, al ver 28 JULIO en una caja puede pensar que se está jugando ya cuando no es así), aunque no hay que quedarse muy preocupado si uno se equivoca, no es una norma así tan esencial que digamos.

Gracias y buen trabajo, a seguir así y suerte al Lleida E. (buena temporada la de su estreno, aunque a lo mejor muchos jugadores transitaron del "muerto" UE Lleida, eso ayuda en la transición). --AL (talk) 16:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toni Seligrat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toni Seligrat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 21:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Francisco Solar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer, has not played first team football in a fully professional league. Fails

WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 13:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 UEFA Regions' Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Divisiones Regionales de Fútbol in Cantabria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polanco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola SCAUFAPE, AL de Portugal "al habla",

por favor, en la caja se pone REAL MADRID B, el nombre al completo es en la historia OK? Ah, y así todos los equipos reserva por favor (ejemplo, SEVILLA ATLÉTICO en la historia, SEVILLA B en caja).

Gracias, que tengas una buena semana - --AL (talk) 16:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Más (lo acabo de descubrir, en Utebo FC): en los títulos se ponen los segundos lugares SÓLO en copas (de equipos u selecciones nacionales) en las ligas sólo se admiten los PRIMEROS puestos. Por favor, si los has hecho en otros clubes quítalo por favor. Gracias --AL (talk) 16:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1966–67 UE Lleida season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Castellón

2012–13 Lleida Esportiu season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jaén

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Copa Catalunya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solsona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are too early to start 2013–14 Tercera División because there is still a vacancy to fill in the 2013–14 Segunda División B. Some of the groups are wrong because you assumed that the groups must contain no more than 20 teams. Group 7 will have 22 teams (if none of the teams receive an administrative promotion). The each Tercera División group is allowed to have a maxium of 22 teams; adding two more relegation spots for the coming season. Raul17 (talk) 19:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for correcting the 22-team Group 7. Raul17 (talk) 23:36, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since Group 7 has 20+2 or 22 teams then the relegation is 4+2 slots. Even if four teams are promoted, 6 teams will relegated and 8 will be promoted from the Catergoría Preferente.Raul17 (talk) 00:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Jorge Giménez, Scaufape!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jorge Giménez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Giménez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:53, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 UEFA Futsal Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lokomotiv Kharkov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joe Modderman‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rikster2 (talk) 01:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Javier Mandaluniz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player, fails

WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 09:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012–13 Copa Catalunya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Copa Catalunya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 16:23, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013–14 Tercera División is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Tercera División until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 15:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I noted that you recommended delete Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Tercera División. I don't agree with you, but I'm not sure of the basis of your opinion . Do you feel that it's not notable? Also, I'd appreciate your opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Copa Catalunya which you appear to have put a lot of work into, but no opined on it's contentious deletion. Nfitz (talk) 21:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am very surprised that there appear to be loads of tables that have not been completed for Template:Tercera División seasons. I am quite happy to tidy-up etc but would appreciate help in preparing the basic tables. The source material can be accessed at http://www.league321.com/spain-football-historic-league-tables.html . Kind regards. League Octopus 20:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I like your playoff format since there is no longer a group format anymore. Will update the previous seasons. Thanks! Raul17 (talk) 15:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Daniel Guerrero Gómez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NFOOTBALL

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:34, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Albert García has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails both

WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 10:49, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, MYS77 "here".

Please, don't create any former Lleida player who doesn't played a match in Segunda División or La Liga. Only signing with a Segunda club is not enough. I saw your creations of Jaime Mata and Jesús Imaz, but both of them aren't fully pro until the day of his debut, according to WP guidelines.

Thanks, MYS77 ^✉ 18:12, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Copa del Rey Juvenil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page REF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out. He also played for Tudelano, on loan as well.

I'm adding it to the article right now.

Cheers, happy weekend. MYS77 ^✉ 02:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited European Junior and U23 Canoe Slalom Championships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hohenlimburg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Spain national football team hat-tricks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ireland national football team. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Spain national football team hat-tricks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

WP:NOTSTATS

violation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 19:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spain national under-17 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletic Club. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scaufape. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Caufapé has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to be a particularly notable surname, especially if less than 100 people have it. No notable ppl with the name to disambiguate to.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:13, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Scaufape, thanks for creating 2017–18 División de Honor Juvenil de Fútbol!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add clear sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 18:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scaufape. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 1967–68 Liga Femenina de Baloncesto, Scaufape!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for sourcing issues.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about

Boleyn (talk) 08:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas, te escribo porque me ha sorprendido ver que en el artículo de la LEB Oro has cambiado el módulo de los resultados por las plantillas Bs, las cuales están en desuso. Me entra la curiosidad del porqué, si la otra opción es más modificable en caso de cambio de nombres, orden y esas cosas. Un saludo y felices fiestas. Asturkian (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, no conseguía visualizarla al completo. Si crees que es mejor la anterior, no hay problema, la cambio. Felices fiestas! 20:23, 24 December 2107 (UTC)

Hola de nuevo. ¿A qué te refieres con no visualizarla al completo? Me extraña, porque estas plantillas son las mismas que se usan en las ligas de fútbol y, al menos a mí en cualquiera de los navegadores, no me está suponiendo ningún problema. Asturkian (talk) 14:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas, los nombres no me salían en la misma línea... debe ser el navegador. Un saludo 20:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Adri Rodrígues. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 11:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.ffmadrid.es/pnfg/NFG_CmpPartido?cod_primaria=1000120&CodActa=919696&cod_acta=919696

http://www.futmadrid.com/noticia/el-c-dot-p-parla-escuela-inicia-2018-con-varios-cambios-en-la-plantilla.html

Hi, this is not anything relating to Wikipedia editing, but I know you have an interest in Spanish youth football and would have more local knowldge than me, so I wanted to ask about Atlético Madrileño. I'm a bit confused about why the team exists? I have tried looking it up on Google etc but as you will know, that was also the name of Atlético B for many years so a lot of the results come back to them. From what I could gather, Atlético Madrileño was an unofficial youth team that represented the club when Jesús Gil stopped the official cantera, and then when the system was restarted, the Atlético Madrileño setup was allowed to continue alongside the official teams? Not sure if I have got that right. Also seems that the Madrileño Juv A team are officially connected to Atlético de Madrid (as per official website) but no other age groups, so do they operate as a separate club below that?

Seems a bit weird to me that Atlético are the only club which can have two teams in the Division de Honor and that they are allowed to operate in two different leagues with the possibility of winning them both, as has happened this season. What will happen if Atléti Juv A is drawn against Atlético Madrileño in the end of year competitions? Or will they be kept apart to try and make sure it doesn't happen?

Thanks for any info you can tell me regarding this. If you are aware of any references (Spanish would be fine, very unlilely to be any in English) which explain the situation, please either point me to it or add it to the Atlético Madrid (youth) article to explain to anyone else who may be wondering about this unusual sitation – at present, Atlético Madrileño linnks back there but there is no team list or other info for them, I'm not saying that is incorrect but it would be good to add something about them on the article if we can. As I stated above, I tried to look myself but most of it just had recent results etc without explaining about the origins of the team, or related to old stuff about Atlético B.

All the best and thanks for keeping the tables etc updated all the time! Crowsus (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Crowsus! Such a good question. Both of them are Atlético de Madrid U-19 teams due the number of players in their academy. Is not a very rare situation on the Spanish youth football. For instance, Antiguoko is a feeder club of Real Sociedad, San Félix of Málaga or Roda of Villarreal. As you see, it's a strange situation, but nothing in Spain is normal ;)

http://www.atleticodemadrid.com/equipos/atletico-madrileno-juvenil-a-2017-2018

Also you're right about the old name of Atlético B-team, as Castilla for Real Madrid B or Atlético Malagueño for Málaga B nowadays.

Thank you for your interest Scaufape (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. It seems strange to me that it is allowed officially, I mean those other teams you mention have very close links to the professional clubs but they are separate, and also play in the same regional division against the 'parent' canteras. It would probably be fairer if Madrileño was separated from Atlético and playing in the same division, although of course they would still get the financial support and share players.

I see they have been drawn against one another in the Copa de Campeones. So Atlético are guaranteed to have a semi finalist. But maybe better than the possibility of them having two! 21:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Scaufape, thanks for creating 1966 Copa del Generalísimo Juvenil!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 19:47, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to the above? Please stop creating unreferenced articles - you've received many messages about this. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to my messages.

I understand it. Best wishes, Scaufape (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, can you please add your sources to 1966 Copa del Generalísimo Juvenil? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scaufape, please respond. Other editors have repeatedly spent time contacting you about adding unverified content; please add references to content you add. Boleyn (talk) 07:43, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How can i do it?. Best wishes, Scaufape (talk) 09:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Scaufape, thanks for responding. Please see Help:Referencing for beginners. If you find it unclear, please let me know. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't addressed the issue. WHat was your source for this article? Please see

WP:TEAHOUSE. I'm happy to add it for you if you tell me what your source was. Boleyn (talk) 09:12, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

I have sent you nine messages on this over the last nine months, and yet you have just created another unreferenced article, 2018–19 Lleida Esportiu season. This is not acceptable. Please add your sources for these or if you are struggling, ask for help. Boleyn (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me showing an example? Thank you for your help and sorry for doing thing bad :( (talk) 11:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a problem not to know how to do something, Scaufape, there's always help if you ask for it at the

WP:TEAHOUSE, just please don't ignore concerns raised. UEFA Youth League is an example - you add a piece of information, then at the end of the sentence put where you got it from. Please let me know if you're still unsure after looking at that and Help:Referencing for beginners. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:44, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Scaufape, do you now understand? Are you able to add your sources to the articles? Boleyn (talk) 17:03, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, now i understand (talk) 14:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. Will you now add references to the articles you've created:

1902–03 Copa Macaya, 1901–02 Copa Macaya, 1965 Copa del Generalísimo Juvenil and many others at [1]? Boleyn (talk) 21:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

You've continued to edit, can you please respond? Boleyn (talk) 21:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i will (talk) 23:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After 14 messagess from me, you have continued to edit but ignored this issue. They are all now moved to draftspace, you can work on them there. Boleyn (talk) 15:05, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello, Scaufape. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to include sources when you make changes! GiantSnowman 13:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks

Andorra national football team, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 21:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Muy buenas, amigo. Aprovechando que eres lleidatà y los ascensos a LEB Plata es algo que me interesa (por si hay vacantes para el Círculo) te pregunto, ¿este club tiene previsto consumar el ascenso o renunciará al mismo? Gracias y un saludo. Asturkian (talk) 12:39, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas! Teniendo en cuenta que es un club humilde, de un barrio de Lleida, es posible que no se pueda hacer frente al ascenso sin el apoyo institucional. De todas formas, la próxima semana tienen reuniones para hablar del tema. Ahora mismo no sabría decirte porque están en plena euforia. Scaufape (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scaufape. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 06:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 1929–30 Campionat de Catalunya.

Please add clear references section.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 1932–33 Campionat de Catalunya.

Please add clear references sections to the articles you create - it may be clear to you but won't be to all readers.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 1936–37 Campionat de Catalunya.

All your creations come up in a special list of new pages with major concerns. If you add a clear references section, this would be simpler for readers and save New Page Patrol a lot of time. Could you please do this in future?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:20, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 1933–34 Campionat de Catalunya.

Please add clear references section.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scaufape. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Hello, Scaufape. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 12:41, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bon dia! Ahora que ya se ha confirmado el ascenso de este club, he creado su artículo por si quieres mejorarlo o modificarlo por completo. El artículo de la liga lo tiene User:Vasconia en su banco de pruebas. Un saludo.

PD: La próxima vez, respóndeme haciendo uso de {{ping|Asturkian}}, así me doy por enterado. Muchas gracias. Asturkian (talk) 07:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019–20 Lleida Esportiu season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019–20 Lleida Esportiu season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 23:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas. Sólo por curiosidad, ¿eres tú el que está creando las ligas andorranas en BDFútbol? Un saludo. Asturkian (talk) 21:47, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sí señor!. Scaufape (talk) 10:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ahí estoy también metido yo, haciendo el fútbol femenino y ahora metido con la Copa RFEF. Te había invitado un par de solicitudes de lectura/edición, aunque sea simplemente para curiosear. Asturkian (talk) 07:24, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Por otra parte, te he guardado tus cosas en uno de mis cajones. Asturkian (talk) 16:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas de nuevo. Aquí tienes los artículos del Lleida Esportiu que salvé antes de su borrado. Te faltaría por actualizar el partido de ayer contra el Villarreal B. Por otra parte, ¿no vas a publicar en BDF la temporada 2018–19? Un saludo. Asturkian (talk) 10:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias! Estoy acabando de retocar algunas cosillas. Scaufape (talk) 10:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Muy buenas, Sergi. He estado recopilando aquí los datos de los jugadores de la UE Lleida que aparecen en las plantillas que juegan Copa estando en Tercera, que ahora se pueden rellenar. A ver si podías ayudar a completar lo que falta más las temporadas en las que ni siquiera se tienen alineaciones de los partidos, como son la 1972–73 y 1971–72. Gracias por tu ayuda, un saludo. Asturkian (talk) 11:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Buenas Gonzalo. Creo que sí puedo ayudarte. Dime cómo lo prefieres. (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Si puedes registrarte y aportar lo que tengas a la comunidad, para completar las temporadas, bienvenido sea. Si no, ya como prefieras. De momento voy a poner ahí los datos que encuentre de las temporadas que te dije. Asturkian (talk) 10:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Tengo unos problemas terribles para registrarme en la comunidad! No hay manera de conseguir contestarte con los datos que encontré Scaufape (talk) 19:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Buenas, ya te he visto contestar. Supongo que ya no te hará falta ayuda, aunque si necesitas que publique algo por ti, lo haré. ¿Qué tienes? ¿Algún libro del club o es hemeroteca del Segre o diarios de allí? Asturkian (talk) 16:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • Es una base de datos del ayuntamiento con diarios antiguos. Si quieres echar una ojeada, a lo mejor te son de utilidad: http://premsadigital.paeria.es/cgi-bin/Pandora.exe. Scaufape (talk) 18:05, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

You are invited in Andorra national football team talk about section "International goals". As a recurrent editor, your contribution will be highly appreciated.

thank you Riktetta (talk) 14:16, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2002–03 UE Lleida season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002–03 UE Lleida season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2006–07 UE Lleida season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006–07 UE Lleida season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2007–08 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced squad list; no indication of meeting

WP:NOTSTATS

; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate football stats database.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1981–82 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced squad list; no indication of meeting

WP:NOTSTATS

; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate football stats database.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:08, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1982–83 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced squad list; no indication of meeting

WP:NOTSTATS

; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate football stats database.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1970–71 UE Lleida season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1970–71 UE Lleida season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1970–71 UE Lleida season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1983–84 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG

; no evidence that this particular season ever received significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1984–85 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG

; no evidence that this season ever received significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1985–86 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is a violation of

WP:GNG

at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2001–02 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is a violation of

WP:GNG

at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1978–79 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is a violation of

WP:GNG

at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1974–75 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is a violation of

WP:GNG

at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1975–76 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this season actually passes

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1977–78 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1979–80 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet our inclusion criteria for football seasons nor

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1980–81 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this season meets

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1976–77 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG

; no evidence of notability for this season.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:00, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1986–87 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG

; no evidence of notability for this particular season.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:13, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1969–70 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; no justification for a stand-alone article on this season. Fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1968–69 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2008–09 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, does not meet

WP:GNG

. No evidence that this season received any significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2010–11 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant coverage for this season, fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:14, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2009–10 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of continuous

WP:GNG

coverage to build an article from for this season.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2000–01 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG

; no evidence of notability for this particular season.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sakiv (talk) 00:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2000–01 UE Lleida season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000–01 UE Lleida season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sakiv (talk) 13:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2003–04 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant coverage per

WP:GNG

, which would be a requirement for a stand-alone season article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sakiv (talk) 01:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2004–05 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant coverage per

WP:GNG

, which would be a requirement for a stand-alone season article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sakiv (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]