User talk:Sdonn072

Hello, Sdonn072, and

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that in this edit you made [1] you stated that you added an inline citation. As far as I can tell, in this edit you actually removed a citation without adding one. Don't worry too much worry about it, we all make mistakes and I'm sure you have the best of intentions. Editing in your sandbox can help if you want to test things. I've undone your change for now, but if you have any questions feel free to ask me and I'll try to help. Also pinging Ian (Wiki Ed) in case that'd be useful.

There's a helpful video about adding a citation in source editor here:

By the way, it's nice to see a student from Ottawa! I'm from Niagara Falls myself, so not too far from there. :) Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:38, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

For notability per

WP:GNG

, we need to see significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. Of those cited, only the last source is secondary, and it's debatable whether it provides significant coverage of the school itself; in any case, it alone isn't enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Listowel District Secondary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:08, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sdonn072! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:08, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junction 56 Distillery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junction 56 Distillery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:58, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Sdonn072. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:07, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]