User talk:SeriousThinker

Hello, SeriousThinker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Audrius Nakas did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, SeriousThinker. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nida Vasiliauskaitė. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ♥Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk)♥ 21:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you'll have to be more specific than that. I don't see how my edits could be interpreted as "vandalism". Edit: I looked into this particular case about those instances of vandalism you're referring to, and I can assure you I have nothing to do with them. SeriousThinker (talk) 21:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dalia Grybauskaitė

added a link pointing to The Insider

Gitanas Nausėda

added a link pointing to Delfi

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Current naming is accepted consensus based on the English literature. If you want to change it, start a discussion on the talk page Marcelus (talk) 13:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Romualdas Ozolas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delfi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you are adding biographical articles of Lithuanian monarchs to the category "Lithuanian monarchy". Don't you think that better solution would be to add category "Category:Lithuanian monarchs" to category "Lithuanian monarchy", since it already consists all the biographies? Marcelus (talk) 14:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I will take out articles from "Lithuanian monarchy" relating to monarchs. The issue is that, following the analogical examples of articles about other countries, the title "Lithuanian monarchs" is not as broad to include institutional articles as well. Either "Lithuanian monarchs" should be renamed to "Lithuanian monarchy", thus making it broader or we should keep them separate, but the red line is not exactly clear here. --SeriousThinker (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2022 (BST) SeriousThinker (talk) 15:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely believe that both categories should exist. Only the category "Lithuanian monarchs" should be a sub-category of the category "Lithuanian monarchy". And biographies should be in the "Lithuanian monarchs" category, it just seems logical to me. Marcelus (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think the rulers listed should have names in the form generally accepted on Wikipedia? I.e. Casimir IV Jagiellon and not Kazimieras Jogailaitis? We should use the forms that are accepted in English literature Marcelus (talk) 23:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vytautas Landsbergis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delfi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lithuanian Family Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CNE.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Elections in the Lithuanian SSR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Edit-warring there again. I feel the only way forward is reporting it. 37.34.79.116 (talk) 19:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SeriousThinker. Thank you for your work on

Thank you for creating the article! Hopefully you will write more, have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Balto-Slavic is well accepted within Indo-European linguistics. If you don't accept that, I don't think you're worthy of the username "SeriousThinker" Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:34, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not for you to decide what I am worthy of. SeriousThinker (talk) 20:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you're little better than a vandal then. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to pester someone because you have nothing better to do, I suggest finding someone else. I have no interest in listening to your worthless moral lectures. SeriousThinker (talk) 21:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Lithuania related articles! I just noticed your edits to Lithuania-related articles and thought you would like to join the Lithuania WikiProject, an initiative to improve coverage of Lithuania-related topics on Wikipedia. You can read the top 10 tips for Lithuanian editos, ask a question, get updates on new articles, and figure out the best way you can help . To stay informed you might want to add the watchlist and sign up . Feel free to join anytime!

Thought you might be interested in joining. --

Thank you for the offer, I'll keep that in mind. SeriousThinker (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Generally your edits are good, but you unfortunately misjudged with the article

I actually did present reasoning when I did the move this article, it's in the history view. It simply makes zero sense to me referring to one ethnographic region in its Latin form (Samogitia) and then referring to the other one in Lithuanian (Aukštaitija). I'm not sure why that should be the case — both Samogitia or Samethia and Austechia appear to be historical names but one of them is no longer suitable? Also, it should be noted that Austechia was the actually the origin title of this article when it was first created, but then somebody decided to change it at some point. SeriousThinker (talk) 11:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Austechia is not similar to Samogitia due to the latter being a far more frequently used word for the region in English-language literature than the former. Even Endre Bojtar refers to the region in his book primarily with its Lithuanian name Aukštaitija and not Austechia, which he only mentions in passing.

talk) 13:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I am aware that Aukštaitija is quite a frequently use term, that's why I kept it next to Austechia. I figured that Austechia could be more acceptable to English-speaking audiences as it is more easy to pronounce and has no special characters, but I do see your point. In that case, we can leave it at that. SeriousThinker (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding and cordiality

talk) 21:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for taking your time and investigating my reasoning behind certain edits without jumping to unnecessary hasty conclusions. I truly appreciate that. SeriousThinker (talk) 11:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swedish Lithuania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swedish Lithuania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Marcelus (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into East Baltic languages. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prince Inigo of Urach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Inigo of Urach until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Marcelus (talk) 22:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]