User talk:ShadowDragon343

Hi ShadowDragon343! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host) talk) 17:21, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply ]

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 19:45, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clermont chain of lakes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polk County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JLOPO. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JLOPO (talk) 11:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ShadowDragon343! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:44, Thursday, December 3, 2015 (

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShadowDragon343. You have new messages at Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016's talk page.
Message added 23:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Musdan77 (talk) 23:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the Endorsements section code. Do you know how to fix the 'Contents' box so only the 'Endorsements' section shows and not the very long list of sub-sections? Thanks, IP75 (talk) 04:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to send some thanks from a few days ago helping to try and restore neutrality to

It's a real problem because Trump supporters tend to be blue-collar workers which would not favor them as a large audience for editing Wikipedia as opposed to Rubio, Clinton and Sanders supporters who have a larger white-collar base that favors more of them editing Wikipedia. When you add the fact that much of the biased media is going against Trump resulting in a potentially biased Wikipedia, it sets up the perfect recipe for disasters like this. Instead of an article mainly about Trumps campaign events and his state victories like other candidates, it's mostly comparing him to Adolf Hitler and the criticism of his campaign. I feel like I am reading an article by someone from the Sanders campaign. I think the section about the criticism on the Trump campaign article needs to be shed off into a page of it's own and the article be revamped to illustrate events like his victories on super Tuesday 1 and 2 with maps etc and actually explain him being the frontrunner and not what others think of him. I can easily add of these victories like the Ted Cruz page but not when the article is allowed to be like this and it's being left to accumulate.ShadowDragon343 (talk) 22:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

==Arbitration enforcement action appeal by <Username>==ShadowDragon343 (talk) 11:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShadowDragon343 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have looked at my edits on the page and I feel like I have been unfairly banned for either providing more sources to back a statement up or doing the necessary task of shortening the page and putting more detailed info in more appropriate pages.ShadowDragon343 (talk) 11:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There was nothing unfair about this block. The arbitration notice above should make that clear. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShadowDragon343 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I now understand that adding that comparing Donald Trump to Ronald Reagan is something that should have been put up on the talk page of the article, If you unban me I will initiate a discussion on the talk page of the

Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016

about it before considering to readd the info, I now understand that it may be met with info stating otherwise and I acted recklessly by readding it.

Decline reason:

Arbitration enforcement appears legitimate and you aren't arguing otherwise. As such, there are no grounds to lift your block. You may follow the instructions to contest the sanction itself if you wish. Yamla (talk) 14:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, ShadowDragon343. I am Ellie. You are not alone. I support Donald Trump for President too. I saw your name on the Donald Trump WikiProject just now. I will do my best to edit DJT-related pages that have unfairly biased content against Trump. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help you with your Trump-related work on Wikipedia, as a fellow member of the Donald Trump WikiProject. MAGA!--FeralOink (talk) 08:40, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cry of the Winged Serpent, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Adrian Alvarado and Dan Golden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Cotton2. ShadowDragon343, thanks for creating Cry of the Winged Serpent!

I've just tagged the page, using our

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

I can therefore conclude that there is no unreasonable deletion of any of the content. I suggest you folow the points and revise the lists. If you're in any doubt, perhaps you'd like to take the discussion to other users. Give it some thought and see what you can come up with. Happy Editing. Deltasim (talk) 11:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So far I have seen too many unencyclopedic dragon characters which are one-offs and play little to no importance or notability in the shows mentioned. Much of the list items seems to be bringing

WP:FANCRUFT to the article. Take a look at Talk:List of dragons in film and television and try again. Deltasim (talk) 14:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of dragons in film and television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hydra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, anime can be reeeeeeeeeeeeally weird--Mr Fink (talk) 03:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of dragons in film and television, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sayaka Aoki, Richard Newman and Atsuko Tanaka. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of dragons in film and television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hal Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as you've been involved in discussing the newly presented Donald Trump photos, I wanted to let you know about a poll of support currently happening here. Please state which photo you support at the bottom of the section. Calibrador (talk) 02:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MegaCon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Andy Smith and Sean Chen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ShadowDragon, good idea to create this new category. But I think granaries is normally spelt with an "a" in the middle, see granary. ☺ --Bermicourt (talk) 12:55, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! I will request a move.ShadowDragon343 (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the here !

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Template:Donald Trump and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 09:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShadowDragon343. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned by your edits to List of countries by salt production; you initially reverted the vandalism but then went along with it. Please don't retain obvious vandalism, even if you find it amusing. Fences&Windows 21:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't condone vandalism but my edits would be reverted right away. I was intending to revert the article at about this time when attention that was bought to it by a meme forum settled down and I am sorry that I did go along with it until it would settle down.ShadowDragon343 (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShadowDragon343. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working collecting data on the results for the Democratic Presidential caucuses or state conventions that were held in earlier years, 1940 being the starting point given I was interested at the time in the Anti-Third Term movement that had sprung up then, and while I can't access all the data in question anyway (I'm using the New York Times as a source, but I'm not a subscriber and so can't look at the articles in detail), I've provided them in the talk pages. Having gotten down to 1928 now, however, I'm not certain how best to display the information given, and I'm not sure if there really is a precedent(s) for it given the operational differences between the Modern Primary and the more Archaic Primary of yesteryear. For example;

1. In 1928 Al Smith clearly won the Democratic Presidential Preference Primary in Ohio over Senator Atlee Pomerene, but the latter was awarded the entirety of the delegation. The situation in question is in an article I provided on the talk page for the '28 Democratic Primaries, but when you have delegates not being bound or awarded based on the results of a Primary, should that be counted as a separate contest? How should we display that on a map? Should one be given preference?
2. Depending on the year in question you either end up with a handful, none, or a whole slew of favorite-son candidates ready to represent State delegations, and these candidates technically have "won" delegates. However in some cases, like those I identified for the 1968 Republican nomination race, are far more than the infobox could possibly handle when combined with the actual candidates (even if we are just talking about candidates and favorite sons that won delegates, that would make 17). Should we give preference based on delegates won? On actual candidates vs. Favorite Sons? What about if they've withdrawn and endorsed a candidate? Should Favorite Sons be combined somehow (for map and infobox purposes) and explained separately in another section?
3. In a number of the Presidential Primaries and even Caucuses I have encountered language that the delegates in question are officially unpledged or uninstructed, but have a strong preference or are generally understood for being for a certain candidate. Under those conditions, should those delegations be considered Unpledged, or should they be considered as being for the candidate? Should the votes of those delegations be included in a candidate's vote total?

These are the major questions at the moment. I'll also be asking a few others Presidential Elections Wikiproject as well to chime in, so if you have any ideas on how best I should proceed, I'd ask that the responses be put into

Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 1932. Thanks ahead of time. --Ariostos (talk) 03:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of

List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hello, ShadowDragon343. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShadowDragon343. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dragon343, I've updated the

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

An article you recently created,

Category:Astronomical places named for Middle-earth has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Regarding your recent edit to New York Comic Con, it is always important to keep in mind that the sources cited in Wikipedia articles should generaly be

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MegaCon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy Mac.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears from the articles history you have been adding a lot of references to MegaCon. FYI: when you cite Twitter or Facebook, you have to include the title in the citation, or else you end up with all these cite errors, as seen here, here, here, here and here. You reckon you could take a minute and clean that up. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 🍁 08:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do I add for the title when citing social media posts? ShadowDragon343 (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Category:Extraterrestrial surface features named for Middle-earth has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 16:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]