User talk:Shakira111

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at El Dorado (Shakira album).

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 12:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry, please explain how the record label inflates sales! I need your clear and complete explanation otherwise this reliable source from the record label has to be edited into it. Shakira11121:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC+8)

• • Please show me where did I add an unsourced material to Wikipedia. Shakira11121:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC+8)

Please stop adding the same content that was already verified by a

talk) 16:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• • Where? Shakira has been nominated for the Rock and roll Hall of Fame in 2012. Show me your recipes to prove me wrong. Your links cannot be opened. Shakira11121:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC+8)

Both links open fine for me. But if you want more, fine: NPR, CBS,Rolling stone,Guardian,USA Today, Los Angeles Times,NY Post, EOnline,Cleveland.com,Entertainment Weekly, Hollywood Reporter,Zimbio. Surely one of these links works for you. Otherwise, just google it yourself.

talk) 12:29, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

FYI, if you bothered to read up on the eligibility criteria for being nominated into the

talk) 12:38, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at El Dorado (Shakira album), you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 20:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• • I have done nothing disruptive, I gave real source from the official account. You should stop changing it.

I don't think you know the meaning of disruption on Wikipedia. It is disruptive to continue restoring something after you've been reverted. You have been reported to an administrator, and quite frankly, edit warring isn't a good look for you after you've only been here for a few months. Read

WP:CONSENSUS. When somebody reverts your change, instead of restoring it, regardless of your reasons or how strongly you feel about it, you should discuss it on the talk page and get consensus to make the change. Ss112 02:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

How are we having a discussion? Edit warring, reverting a user isn't a discussion. You discuss on talk pages, not through reverts. The column in the certifications table says "Certified units/Sales". The Nielsen figure given is certainly not a certification, and not just sales either—it includes streams. The US figure is a certification. The Italian figure is a certification. Those are certified because the certification includes streams. Nobody is claiming 960,000 in the US is only sales. If the figure in the column is neither purely a certification or a purely sales figure, we don't include it. One more revert on

WP:3RR. You should have been blocked for your past disruptive behaviour at this point anyway. Ss112 15:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 16:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Selena. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. – jona ✉ 18:55, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Shakira shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:50, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Shakira111 reported by User:Chrissymad (Result: ). Thank you. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 17:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

File permission problem with File:Shakira's El Dorado World Tour in San Antonio.png

Thanks for uploading File:Shakira's El Dorado World Tour in San Antonio.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:19, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Shakira's tour ticket price in Washington DC.png

The file File:Shakira's tour ticket price in Washington DC.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Is a file like this really helpful to "any" article of this type.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:24, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakira's Istanbul show.png

talk) 17:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blanket reverting

Stop reverting my edits without a valid reason. All content on Wikipedia has to be verified by a

reliable source and none of your reverts have addressed that. If you continue to blanket revert edits, I will report you for disrupting Wikipedia. Erick (talk) 14:39, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Laundry Service Inflated sales.

I don't understand why you want to inflated Shakira sales here in Wikipedia. This album sold "only" 8 million copies between USA and Europe, there's no way this album sold more 10 million in latin countries that are little markets and you get a certification when you sold 5,000 copies. 18 million copies is too high. 13 million is the more accurate based in the album certifications and peak positions. Stop inflated that album sales, we have to be accurate here in Wikipedia.This site made a very good analysis about the album sales, I think you should read to understand why what you're doing is wrong.link--

talk) 11:54, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of best-selling Latin music artists. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:24, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Laundry Service. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Longhair\^talk 14:56, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply

]