User talk:Sjc

This user may have left Wikipedia. Sjc has not edited Wikipedia since March 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hi Sjc, I just imported 10 edits of your user page from the Nostalgia Wikipedia, a copy of the Wikipedia database from 20 December 2001. I'm going through the list of most heavily edited pages on the Nostalgia Wikipedia, and your user page was #769 on that list. I Hope you don't mind, and that the earlier history isn't a hindrance to your work. Graham87 14:50, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Helen Atkinson-Wood - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Roy Hudd - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Ruby Walsh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Gordon Sparks - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Dan McCauley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Issue 2 (January 2010) Next issue

Content

Hello, you created the page Siperia as a stub in 2006. Since then house has been destroyed in a fire, amogst others. I am seeking to delete this poor quality article, and would much appreciate comments. Thank you! --hydrox (talk) 11:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sjc, I encountered your user pages again while doing another search for lost edits in the Nostalgia Wikipedia. This time I'm searching for pages that end in "/talk" rather than the proper suffix of "/Talk"; any pages using "/talk" were swallowed up in the conversion to Phase II software in January 2002. Therefore I imported the edits at

To clarify, I would only be a bit reluctant to delete User talk:Sjc/old, since it contains significant history. The rest of the pages can stay or go at your pleasure. Graham87 11:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sjc, I'm not sure if this page is still operational, I saw you made some edits in March. I see that you created most of the copy for

]

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday, Sjc, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a nice day! Logan Talk Contributions 00:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover | Feature | News and announcements | Humor | Want ads To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victor Meldrew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Meldrew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Koopatrev (talk) 09:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sjc,

The article for Philippe Buonarroti has been challenged as to whether he was a Freemason. As you added this, would you be able to provide a citation please?

JASpencer (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gunnies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunnies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 05:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al-Qanoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Qanoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. OrangesRyellow (talk) 12:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article The Cloggies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and completely irrelevant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Trunky (talk) 10:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Timex (Unix) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A timex command that does not have any kind of independent notability. There do not appear to be any sources that discuss it any significant manner.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 15:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smuggling in fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smuggling in fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect World War II/Edited Text has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 4 § World War II/Edited Text until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One Foot in the Grave has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 07:35, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

]

Nomination of

The Monk (Doctor Who)

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The Monk (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Monk (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 00:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Cloggies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Cloggies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cloggies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dronebogus (talk) 08:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]