User talk:Sliders64

You blocked me for why ? I speak english 2 or 3 Times and After i speak only in english. So i wait for your explanations ? Sliders64 (talk) 16:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I speak french 2 or 3 Times i want to say Sliders64 (talk) 16:58, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: no answer to my question? Sliders64 (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: corection! i speak only one time in french and after that i speak in english and you blocked me for that? Sliders64 (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not online 24/7.

• Regarding communication issues, I only had to open the revision history of this talk page and click "prev" next to your username; this leads to interesting diffs such as these: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] I call that "severe communication issues" and "responding to other users' concerns in French after being asked to use English, for the sole purpose of making a point". If you believe that's not an accurate description, feel free to request an independent review using the instructions above.
• Regarding edit warring, well, you haven't addressed that yet.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! [12] appeared while I was typing. If you still need editing access to this talk page, stop attacking others. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

so because I spoke in French once or twice you blocked me. I do not have the right to modify the pages after having given explanations but MSport1005 can do it. I must not attack MSport1005 but he has all the freedom to do so, in particular by accusing me of vandalism.I'm blocked but not him!All this would it not be biased? Sliders64 (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{re|ToBeFree}}I am copying and pasting the explanations I gave concerning the reasons for these changes. "I have already explained to you that the formula 3 category in wikipedia was a category that grouped together all the F3 type formulas (Austrlalian F3, Formula regional, FIA F3, DREXLER cup, Euroformula, Superformula lights, etc.). Your explanations are inconsistent because you leave the FIA ​​F3 and the regional formula in the same category when they have nothing in common, even less with the Australian Formula 3. So the formula 3 category corresponds to a type of formula and not to the rules of the regional formula. Look at the previous seasons 2021, 2020... in the formula three category and you will have your answer. In this case, create a regional formula category." Sliders64 (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: i am copying and pasting the explanations I gave concerning the reasons for these changes. "I have already explained to you that the formula 3 category in wikipedia was a category that grouped together all the F3 type formulas (Austrlalian F3, Formula regional, FIA F3, DREXLER cup, Euroformula, Superformula lights, etc.). Your explanations are inconsistent because you leave the FIA ​​F3 and the regional formula in the same category when they have nothing in common, even less with the Australian Formula 3. So the formula 3 category corresponds to a type of formula and not to the rules of the regional formula. Look at the previous seasons 2021, 2020... in the formula three category and you will have your answer. In this case, create a regional formula category." Sliders64 (talk) 17:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many new users mix up Wikipedias and initially contribute in a different language than English. Some of them are unable to read English text at all, and we attempt to welcome and guide them with messages in their preferred language(s) using templates such as {{welcomeen-fr}}. Your English, on the contrary, is well-understandable, and you did choose to edit the English Wikipedia and communicate with its other editors. You chose to repeatedly revert others' contributions, such as at 2022 Super Formula Lights, to the point of full protection and beyond. The last thing you did before the block was conducting a series of reverts to your preferred revision of multiple pages, in response to objections about your edits. When this happens in combination with (or at least shortly after) a refusal to communicate in English despite clearly being able to, you end up being blocked. Biased? It would have been strangely biased against the rest of the community not to prevent you from annoying them further. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: you evade all the questions that I ask you in your message like why I am blocked and why Msport1005 is not? why does he have the right to modify my changes and not me? I copied and pasted my arguments but at no time do you allude to them. your username is ToBeFree. To be free for what? to discriminate against people who don't think like you? A moderator must be impartial. Unfortunately you are not. I have been contributing for several years to improving and updating single-seater information on existing pages. And result? you block me without any concideration for my arguments and the contributions that I could bring in the past. It is not fair. Sliders64 (talk) 16:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTTHEM

is the Wikipedia equivalent of this explanation. Again, you're welcome to let someone else evaluate whether the block was justified.

There are generally two types of unblock requests: Those which argue that the initial block was unjustified, and those which argue that it is no longer needed. Both is possible, and I can't judge in this case here. I may be completely wrong, and you're free to request this to be checked. However, what I can report from observation of other users' unblock requests about other administrators' blocks, in over 90% of the cases, the initial block was very justified and those arguing against the initial justification of the block are almost always incorrect. Those who understand the reason for their block and are willing to change their behavior to match the community's expectations practically only need to convince the reviewing administrator of this understanding and are unblocked without much bureaucracy.

The unblock template can be used for both types of unblock requests, and there is no time limit for doing so. If I may make a suggestion, think about the two options for a while, perhaps a week, and create an unblock request with a concise, clear description of what has happened and why the block can be removed. I'm fine with any administrator reviewing the request without asking me before unblocking. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once again you evade my questions by referring me to links. you infantilized me with your "it's not me it's him". You are over the limit by referring me to a link that compares my attitude in the example of this link to the defense of Klaus Barbie during the Nuremberg trial! For your information, my maternal grandfather was locked up in a Nazi concentration camp during the Second World War. and it's me who is blocked for so-called wikipedia vandalism! wow! With the questions I asked you I'm just trying to understand why the rules aren't the same for everyone and for the moment I don't have a clear answer, except for a moral lesson by referring me to off-topic links. I will make a request for unblock and " faire ammende honorable" ( i don't know the translation in english for this expression) for some of my actions but not for others or I am in my right Sliders64 (talk) 15:43, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was not my intention; see tu quoque for the main article about the logical fallacy unrelated to any legal context. What I was trying to say is that the block is about your behavior, not others', and an unblock discussion is about your behavior, not others'. Two wrongs don't make a right is another way of saying this. I'm not evading your questions by referring you to links, I'm providing links to show that this is not solely my opinion but actually reflects, for example, the advice in the guide for requesting unblocks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sliders64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Écrivez en anglais, s'il vous plaît ... c'est un des raisons pour votre bloque. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bonjour.Merci de bien vouloir débloquer mon compte. Lors d'une modification de page que j'ai effectué, un utilisateur de wikpédia à remodifié mon intervention. il s'en est suivi une modification incessante entre cet utilisateur et moi même et des échanges musclés dont je regrette le contenu venant de ma part. J’ aussi écris en français dans la discussion de cette page en anglais. On m’ a bloqué pour mes propos qui n'ont jamais été injurieux mais je reconnais assez désobligeant. On m'a aussi bloqué pour avoir écris en français ce que j'ai corrigé tout de suite pour la suite de la discussion et pourtant on me reproche d'avoir continuer à écrire en français ce qui n'était plus le cas. En revanche je maintient avoir été dans mon bon droit quand à la modification que j'avais apporté. J'ai contribué plusieurs fois dans la catégorie sport automobile à faire évoluer les pages wikipédia depuis des années. Je veux juste apporter ma contribution à mon niveau pour enrichir les pages concernant dans mon domaine de compétence. je regrette à nouveau mes échanges pas très constructif dans mes discussions. Merci d'avance de bien vouloir me permettre de participer de façon intelligente à l'enrichissement de wikipédia. Cordialement Sliders64 (talk) 08:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sliders64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Your continued inability to correctly write an unblock request does nothing to convince me you have overcome the

WP:CIR issues. Try again. You'll probably only get one more chance, though, so make it count. Yamla (talk) 20:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello. Thank you for unblocking my account. During a page modification that I made, a wikipedia user modified my intervention. there followed an incessant modification between this user and myself and strong exchanges of which I regret the content coming from me. I also write in French in the discussion of this page in English. I was blocked for my remarks which were never offensive but I recognize quite derogatory. I was also blocked for having written in French which I corrected immediately for the rest of the discussion and yet I am reproached for having continued to write in French which was no longer the case. On the other hand I maintain to have been in my right when with the modification which I had brought. I have contributed several times in the motorsport category to make the wikipedia pages evolve for years. I just want to make my contribution at my level to enrich the pages concerning in my area of ​​expertise. I again regret my not very constructive exchanges in my discussions. Thank you in advance for allowing me to participate intelligently in the enrichment of Wikipedia. Cordially PS: I made my unlocking request first in French because I thought I was on the French version of Wikipedia Sliders64 (talk) 16:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are most certainly right not to unblock me but I would like to understand what does not correspond to my unblocking request? Thanks in advance. Sliders64 (talk) 17:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sliders64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Please defer to UTRS for further consideration. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I allow myself to make you a request again to unblock my account. I took the time to reflect on my blocking and my previous unblocking request. Following the modification of a page concerning motorsport, this one was canceled by another user. There followed an incessant modification between this user and myself. I made remarks and reflections to him that were incorrect and inappropriate. I actually also discussed in French when I should have exclusively written in English. First of all, I should have not constantly modified the page concerned and discussed in a much more constructive way with this user. As I said in my previous request i just want to make my contribution at my level to enrich the pages concerning in my area of expertise. Thank you in advance for allowing me to participate intelligently in enrichment o wikipedia. Cordially Sliders64 (talk) 16:56, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]