User talk:Sri Harsha 191817
Sri Harsha 191817, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Sri Harsha 191817! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 1 December 2018 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
You are most welcome sir. Sir, we should thank user Festival Lovers because he/she created article
November 2019
Hello, I'm TheAwesomeHwyh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bhima—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheAwesomeHwyh 16:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought I reverted the edit which was below. My intention was to revert the edit below it. But by mistake, I reverted wrong edit. Thanks for telling me. Once again sorry for unconstructive edit. Sri Harsha 191817 (talk) 08:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
In most cases, once your account is
Hello Sri Harsha 191817, please note
]Sorry sir, I thought you were normal user. And now I got the point sir. Sir, Thank you for correcting me. Sri Harsha 191817 (talk) 08:54, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Article Atirathi
Why did you directed my article to "Hindu mythological wars"? Is it not ok. Festival Lovers (talk) 16:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Its not your article. You might have created it. But you can't say that it's your article. The reason is- it is same content which is in
Discretionary Sanctions Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in
For additional information, please see the
—SpacemanSpiff 06:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Fylindfotberserk sir wishes for New Year
Thank you very much sir. Wish you the same sir 💙
- You are most welcome. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Suggestion
You can install twinkle. If you use that, you can revert consecutive disruptive edits in one go. Not 3 times likr this. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
I know sir. I selected it in my preference but it is not visible sir. Thank you very much for your advise sir. Sir, I hope you will guide me and take me in correct path. Thank you sir Sri Harsha 18:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm.. sometimes that happens. I also had problems with some gadgets. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Yes sir. Thank you sir Sri Harsha 18:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Article Draupadi
Hi,
Just wanted to let you know that both Critical Edition and Southern Recension mention him failing to string the bow. Lifting was successfully done by him and many other suitors.
So reverting your change.
If you have any concerns, please ping me here. We can discuss. (Panchalidraupadi (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC))
Yes. I got your point. But grammatically it is not correct. Like what's meaning of "string the bow". Sri Harsha 14:44, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Google stringing the bow...:) Also check Drupada's page. Panchalidraupadi (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
~Swarm~ {sting} 02:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank you sir
Sri Harsha 02:28, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text ]{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. regentspark (comment) 01:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC) |
Sri Harsha 191817 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm not sock of anyone. It might be co-incidence. Please unblock me. If you want, please see my track record. I just reverted edits but never created vandalism. Infact i fought against vandalism. Please unblock me. Hope I get unblocked. Sri Harsha 11:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
A simple denial is not sufficient in sockpuppetry cases, as every sockpuppeteer denies doing so. If you are not a sockpuppet, you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why we think you are if you aren't. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:11, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.